Returning study results to research participants: Data access, format, and sharing preferences
- PMID: 36565546
- PMCID: PMC9869800
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104955
Returning study results to research participants: Data access, format, and sharing preferences
Abstract
Introduction: Research participants have a growing expectation for transparency with their collected information; however, there is little guidance on participant preferences for receiving health information and how researchers should return this information to participants.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey with a representative sample of 502 participants in the United States. Participants were asked about their preferences for receiving, sharing, and the formatting of health information collected for research purposes.
Results: Most participants wanted their health information returned (84 %) to use it for their own knowledge and to manage their own health. Email was the most preferred format for receiving health data (67 %), followed by online website (44 %), and/or paper copy (32 %). Data format preferences varied by age, education, financial resources, subjective numeracy, and health literacy. Around one third of Generation Z (25 %), Millennials (30 %), and Generation X (29 %) participants preferred to receive their health information with a mobile app. In contrast, very few Baby Boomers (12 %) and none from the Silent Generation preferred the mobile app format. Having a paper copy of the data was preferred by 38 % of participants without a college degree compared to those with a college degree. Preferences were highest for sharing all health information with doctors and nurses (77 %), and some information with friends and family (66 %).
Conclusion: Study findings support returning research information to participants in multiple formats, including email, online websites, and paper copy. Preferences for whom to share information with varied by stakeholders and by sociodemographic characteristics. Researchers should offer multiple formats to participants and tailor data sharing options to participants' preferences. Future research should further explore combinations of individual characteristics that may further influence data sharing and format preferences.
Keywords: Health informatics; Patient-reported outcomes; Recruitment; Transparency; Trust.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Understanding preferences for receiving health communications and information about clinical trials: a cross-sectional study among US adults.Curr Med Res Opin. 2024 May 6:1-8. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2024.2340720. Online ahead of print. Curr Med Res Opin. 2024. PMID: 38595182
-
Privacy, Trust, and Data Sharing in Web-Based and Mobile Research: Participant Perspectives in a Large Nationwide Sample of Men Who Have Sex With Men in the United States.J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jul 4;20(7):e233. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9019. J Med Internet Res. 2018. PMID: 29973332 Free PMC article.
-
Practices and Barriers in Developing and Disseminating Plain-Language Resources Reporting Medical Research Information: A Scoping Review.Patient. 2024 Sep;17(5):493-518. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00700-y. Epub 2024 Jun 15. Patient. 2024. PMID: 38878237 Free PMC article.
-
Building trust in research through information and intent transparency with health information: representative cross-sectional survey of 502 US adults.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Aug 16;29(9):1535-1545. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac084. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022. PMID: 35699571 Free PMC article.
-
Characteristics of available studies and dissemination of research using major clinical data sharing platforms.Clin Trials. 2021 Dec;18(6):657-666. doi: 10.1177/17407745211038524. Epub 2021 Aug 18. Clin Trials. 2021. PMID: 34407656 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Using Patient Decision Aids for Cardiology Care in Diverse Populations.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2023 Nov;25(11):1543-1553. doi: 10.1007/s11886-023-01953-z. Epub 2023 Nov 9. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2023. PMID: 37943426 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Current global practice and implications for future research on disseminating health research results to study participants: A systematic review.PLoS Med. 2025 Aug 14;22(8):e1004569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004569. eCollection 2025 Aug. PLoS Med. 2025. PMID: 40811427 Free PMC article.
-
Returning individual wearable sensor results to participants: perspectives on challenges and lessons learned.Front Digit Health. 2025 Mar 25;7:1569452. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1569452. eCollection 2025. Front Digit Health. 2025. PMID: 40200993 Free PMC article.
-
Integrating public preferences to overcome racial disparities in research: findings from a US survey on enhancing trust in research data-sharing practices.JAMIA Open. 2025 May 2;8(3):ooaf031. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf031. eCollection 2025 Jun. JAMIA Open. 2025. PMID: 40322632 Free PMC article.
-
Returning Individualized Wearable Sensor Results to Older Adult Research Participants: A Pilot Study.J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2025 Apr 7;80(5):glaf027. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaf027. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2025. PMID: 39981696 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kao CK, Liebovitz DM. Consumer Mobile Health Apps: Current State, Barriers, and Future Directions. PM R. 2017;9(5S):S106–S115. - PubMed
-
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Health and Medicine Division, Board on Health Sciences Policy, et al. Advancing Practices for Returning Individual Research Results. National Academies Press (US); 2018. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical