Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for luminal breast tumors: State of the art, challenges and future perspectives
- PMID: 36565894
- DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103900
Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for luminal breast tumors: State of the art, challenges and future perspectives
Erratum in
-
Corrigendum to "Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for luminal breast tumors: State of the art, challenges and future perspectives" [Crit. Rev. Oncol./Hematol. 181 (2023) 103900].Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2024 Aug;200:104308. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104308. Epub 2024 Jun 13. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2024. PMID: 38876959 No abstract available.
Abstract
Neoadjuvant endocrine treatment (NET) associates to satisfactory rates of breast conservative surgery and conversions from inoperable to operable hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative breast cancer (BC), with less toxicities than neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and similar outcomes. Hence, it has been proposed as a logical alternative to NACT in patients with HR+/HER2- BC candidate to a neoadjuvant approach. Nevertheless, potential barriers to the widespread use of NET include the heterogeneous nature of patient response coupled with the long duration needed to achieve a clinical response. However, interest in NET has significantly increased in the last decade, owing to more in-depth investigation of several biomarkers for a more adequate patient selection and on-treatment benefit monitoring, such as PEPI score, Ki67 and genomic assays. This review is intended to describe the state-of-the-art regarding NET, its future perspectives and potential integration with molecular biomarkers for the optimal selection of patients, regimen and duration of (neo)adjuvant treatments.
Keywords: Biomarker; Breast cancer; Endocrine receptor; Endocrine therapy; Ki67; Neoadjuvant therapy.
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest MP, received advisory board fees from Novartis. GB received honoraria or speaker’s fee from Novartis, GSK, Eli-Lilly, Pfizer, Astra-Zeneca, Roche and Genetic Spa. UDG received honoraria for advisory boards or invited speaker fees from Pfizer, BMS, MSD, PharmaMar, Astellas, Bayer, Ipsen, Novartis, Roche, Clovis, AstraZeneca, institutional research grants from AstraZeneca, Sanofi and Roche. The other authors declare no conflict of interests.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous