Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May;93(5):1227-1231.
doi: 10.1111/ans.18220. Epub 2022 Dec 25.

Establishing a state-wide pelvic exenteration multidisciplinary team meeting in South Australia

Affiliations

Establishing a state-wide pelvic exenteration multidisciplinary team meeting in South Australia

Tracy Fitzsimmons et al. ANZ J Surg. 2023 May.

Abstract

Background: Pelvic exenteration surgery is complex, necessitating co-ordinated multidisciplinary input and improved referral pathways. A state-wide pelvic exenteration multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting was established in SA and the outcomes of this were audited and compared with historical data.

Methods: All patients referred for discussion between August 2021 and July 2022 to the SA State-wide Pelvic Exenteration MDT were included in this study. MDT discussion centred around disease resectability, risk versus benefit of surgery, and need for local or interstate referral. Prospective data collection included patient demographics and MDT recommendations of surgery, palliation, or referral. Patients referred for surgery locally or interstate were compared with a retrospective patient cohort treated previously between January and December 2020.

Results: Over 12 months, 91 patients were discussed (including nine multiple times), by a mean of 18 meeting participants each month. Forty-eight patients (58.5%) had primary malignancy, 25 (30.5%) recurrent malignancy, and 9 (11.0%) had non-malignant disease. Colorectal cancer was the most common presentation (56.1%), followed by gynaecological (30.5%) and urological (6.1%) malignancy. Pelvic exenteration surgery was recommended to be performed locally in 53.7% of patients and the remainder for non-surgical treatment, palliation, or re-discussion. During this time, 44 patients underwent surgery locally (versus 34 in 2020) and only 4 referred interstate (versus 8 in 2020).

Conclusion: The establishment of a dedicated state-wide pelvic exenteration MDT has resulted in better coordination of care for patients with locally advanced pelvic malignancy in SA, and significantly reduced the need for interstate referral.

Keywords: colorectal cancer; multidisciplinary care; pelvic exenteration.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Humphries EL, Kroon HM, Dudi-Venkata NN, Thomas ML, Moore JW, Sammour T. Short- and long-term outcomes of selective pelvic exenteration surgery in a low-volume specialized tertiary setting. ANZ J. Surg. 2019; 89: E226-30.
    1. Beyond TME Collaborative. Consensus statement on the multidisciplinary management of patients with recurrent and primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes. Br. J. Surg. 2013; 100: E1-E33.
    1. Vallance AE, Harji D, Fearnhead NS, IMPACT Collaborative. Making an IMPACT: a priority setting consultation exercise to improve outcomes in patients with locally advanced, recurrent and metastatic colorectal cancer. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2019; 45: 1567-74.
    1. PelvEx Collaborative. Perioperative management and anaesthetic considerations in pelvic exenterations using Delphi methodology: results from the PelvEx collaborative. BJS Open 2021; 5: zraa055.
    1. Newman EA, Guest AB, Helvie MA et al. Changes in surgical management resulting from case review at a breast cancer multidisciplinary tumor board. Cancer 2006; 107: 2346-51.

LinkOut - more resources