Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 8:13:925577.
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.925577. eCollection 2022.

Risk prediction model establishment with tri-phasic CT image features for differential diagnosis of adrenal pheochromocytomas and lipid-poor adenomas: Grouping method

Affiliations

Risk prediction model establishment with tri-phasic CT image features for differential diagnosis of adrenal pheochromocytomas and lipid-poor adenomas: Grouping method

Zhongfeng Niu et al. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to establish a risk prediction model for differential diagnosis of pheochromocytomas (PCCs) from lipid-poor adenomas (LPAs) using a grouping method based on tri-phasic CT image features.

Methods: In this retrospective study, we enrolled patients that were assigned to a training set (136 PCCs and 183 LPAs) from two medical centers, along with an external independent validation set (30 PCCs and 54 LPAs) from another center. According to the attenuation values in unenhanced CT (CTu), the lesions were divided into three groups: group 1, 10 HU < CTu ≤ 25 HU; group 2, 25 HU < CTu ≤ 40 HU; and group 3, CTu > 40 HU. Quantitative and qualitative CT imaging features were calculated and evaluated. Univariate, ROC, and binary logistic regression analyses were applied to compare these features.

Results: Cystic degeneration, CTu, and the peak value of enhancement in the arterial and venous phase (DEpeak) were independent risk factors for differential diagnosis of adrenal PCCs from LPAs. In all subjects (groups 1, 2, and 3), the model formula for the differentiation of PCCs was as follows: Y = -7.709 + 3.617*(cystic degeneration) + 0.175*(CTu ≥ 35.55 HU) + 0.068*(DEpeak ≥ 51.35 HU). ROC curves were drawn with an AUC of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.927-0.973) in the training set and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.860-0.929) in the external validation set.

Conclusion: A reliable and practical prediction model for differential diagnosis of adrenal PCCs and LPAs was established using a grouping method.

Keywords: adenomas; adrenal; computed tomography; pheochromocytomas; risk prediction model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart shows exclusion criteria for the study. PCCs, pheochromocytomas. LRAs, lipid-rich adenomas. LPAs, lipid-poor adenomas. Group 1: 10 HU < CTu ≤ 25 HU. Group 2: 25 HU < CTu ≤ 40 HU. Group 3: CTu > 40 HU.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Graph shows ROC of CTu for differentiating PCCs from LPAs in group 1. (B) Graph shows ROCs of CTu, CTv, DEpeak, LD, and SD in group 2. (C) Graph shows ROCs of LD and SD in group 3. (D) Graph shows ROCs of CTu, CTa, CTv, DEpeak, RPW, LD, and SD in all subjects (groups 1, 2, and 3).
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) ROC analysis of the model in group 2 on the training set. The AUC was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.902–0.984), with accuracy, sensitivity, specificity of 88.7, 90.4, and 87.0%, respectively. (B) ROC analysis of the model in group 2 on the external validation set. The AUC was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.823–0.927) with accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 82.2, 69.0, and 90.0%, respectively.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A) ROC analysis of the model in all subjects (groups 1, 2, and 3) on the training set. The value of the AUC was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.927–0.973). The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the model were 87.1, 91.2, and 82.0%, respectively. (B) ROC analysis of the model in all subjects (groups 1, 2, and 3) on the external validation set. The AUC was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.860–0.929), with accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 80.9, 64.5, and 90.6%, respectively.
Figure 5
Figure 5
 A left adrenal LPA in a 63-year-old man. (A) Axial unenhanced phase. (B) Axial arterial phase. (C) Axial venous phase. The values of CTu, CTa, CTv, and DEpeak were 25.23, 70.61, 75.02, and 49.79 HU, respectively. LD and SD of the mass were 25 and 20 mm. No cystic degeneration was seen within the tumor.
Figure 6
Figure 6
 A left adrenal PCC in a 57-year-old man. (A) Axial unenhanced phase. (B) Axial arterial phase. (C) Axial venous phase. The values of CTu, CTa, CTv, and DEpeak were 37.54, 105.17, 128.79, and 91.25 HU, respectively. LD and SD of the mass were 40 and 38 mm. Cystic degeneration was seen within the Lesion (red star).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Young WF, Jr. Clinical practice. the incidentally discovered adrenal mass. N Engl J Med (2007) 356:601–10. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp065470 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Glazer DI, Mayo-Smith WW. Management of incidental adrenal masses: an update. Abdom Radiol (NY) (2020) 45:892–900. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-02149-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fassnacht M, Arlt W, Bancos I, Dralle H, Newell-Price J, Sahdev A, et al. . Management of adrenal incidentalomas: European society of endocrinology clinical practice guideline in collaboration with the European network for the study of adrenal tumors. Eur J Endocrinol (2016) 175:G1–G34. doi: 10.1530/EJE-16-0467 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mann SJ, Gerber LM. Estimation of 24-hour sodium excretion from spot urine samples. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) (2010) 12:174–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2009.0024.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sawka AM, Prebtani AP, Thabane L, Gafni A, Levine M, Young WF, Jr. A systematic review of the literature examining the diagnostic efficacy of measurement of fractionated plasma free metanephrines in the biochemical diagnosis of pheochromocytoma. BMC Endocr Disord (2004) 4:2. doi: 10.1186/1472-6823-4-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms