Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Dec 7:12:960527.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.960527. eCollection 2022.

Clinical implication and management of rectal cancer with clinically suspicious lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis: A radiation oncologist's perspective

Affiliations
Review

Clinical implication and management of rectal cancer with clinically suspicious lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis: A radiation oncologist's perspective

Gyu Sang Yoo et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Rectal cancer is the eighth most common malignancy worldwide. With the introduction of total mesorectal excision (TME) and neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NCRT), intrapelvic local control has been remarkably improved. However, lateral pelvic recurrence remains problematic, especially in patients with clinically suspicious lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN). LPLN dissection has been applied for the management of LPLN metastasis, mainly in Japan and other Eastern countries, while the role of NCRT is more emphasized and LPLN dissection is performed in very limited cases in Western countries. However, the optimal management strategy for patients with rectal cancer with suspicious LPLN metastasis has not been determined. Herein, we review the latest studies on the optimal management of LPLN metastasis to suggest the most appropriate treatment policies according to current evidence and discuss future research directions.

Keywords: chemoradiation; lateral pelvic lymph node; lymph node dissection; neoadjuvant treatment; radiotherapy; rectal neoplasm; recurrence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Examples of rectum anatomy on magnetic resonance image from a man (A) and a woman (B) with rectal cancer. In the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, the rectum is defined as the portion of the bowel located below an imaginary line drawn from the sacral promontory to the top of the pubic symphysis (white dashed lines). The anterior peritoneal reflections (white arrows) is located around the upper border of the seminal vesicle [asterisk in (A)] in the man or uterocervical angle [asterisk in (B)] in the woman. In the NCCN guidelines, the rectum is divided according to the relative location from the anterior peritoneal reflection: upper rectum, above the anterior peritoneal reflection; mid-rectum, at the anterior peritoneal reflection; and lower-rectum, below the anterior peritoneal reflection. Rectal cancers (black arrows) locate below (A) and across (B) the anterior peritoneal reflection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Lymphatic drainage of the rectum. The lymphatic drainage above the peritoneal reflection follows mostly an upward pathway along the perirectal, superior rectal, and inferior mesenteric nodes via the mesenteric vessel (along the dark blue arrow). Rectal tumors below the peritoneal reflection tend to drain along the mid-rectal vessel and then into the pelvic sidewall lymph nodes, including the obturator, internal iliac, external iliac, and common iliac lymph nodes (along the sky-blue arrow). The third route of the lymphatic drainage is from the level below the dentate line, in which the lymphatic spread is along the inferior rectal vessel and then into the superficial inguinal and external iliac lymph nodes.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Example of a dosimetry in the radiation therapy (RT) plan with a boost to the lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) using the intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) simultaneous intensity boost (SIB) technique. The patient is a 62-year-old woman with non-metastatic locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma extending to the lower rectum with perirectal fat invasion and clinically suspicious LPLN metastases in the left internal iliac and right obturator area. The LPLNs are irradiated with 58.8 Gy in 28 fractions [red color washes in (A-C)] while the primary tumor [orange lines in (A-C)] and other lymphatic area [sky-blue lines in (A-C)] were irradiated with 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions. (D) shows the dose-volume histogram of the RT plan (yellow line, bladder; purple line, right femur head; violet line, left femur head; orange line, primary tumor, sky-blue line, pelvic lymphatics; pink line, LPLNs).

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin (2018) 68(6):394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ahuja V. Open surgical techniques in colorectal cancer. In: Gearhart SL, Ahuja N, editors. Early diagnosis and treatment of cancer series: Colorectal cancer. Saint Louis: W.B. Saunders; (2011). p. p.145–65.
    1. Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery–the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg (1982) 69(10):613–6. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800691019 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baek JY, Yu JI, Park HC, Choi DH, Yoo GS, Cho WK, et al. . Risk factors for locoregional recurrence in patients with pathologic T3N0 rectal cancer with negative resection margin treated by surgery alone. Radiat Oncol J (2019) 37(2):110–6. doi: 10.3857/roj.2019.00199 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, Rodel C, Wittekind C, Fietkau R, et al. . Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med (2004) 351(17):1731–40. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040694 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources