Biphasic majority voting-based comparative COVID-19 diagnosis using chest X-ray images
- PMID: 36570382
- PMCID: PMC9767662
- DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119430
Biphasic majority voting-based comparative COVID-19 diagnosis using chest X-ray images
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has been affecting the world since December 2019, and nowadays, the number of infected is increasing rapidly. Chest X-ray images are clinical adjuncts that can be used in the diagnosis of COVID-19 disease. Because of the rapid spread of COVID-19 disease worldwide and the limited number of expert radiologists, the proposed method uses the automatic diagnosis method rather than a manual diagnosis method. In the paper, COVID-19 Positive/Negative (2275 Positive, 4626 Negative) and Normal/Pneumonia (2313 Normal, 2313 Pneumonia) are diagnosed using chest X-ray images. Herein, 80 % and 20 % of the images are used in the training and validation set, respectively. In the proposed method, six different classifiers are trained using chest X-ray images, and the five most successful classifiers are used in both phases. In Phase-1 and Phase-2, image features are extracted using the Bag of Features method for Cosine K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Linear Discriminant, Logistic Regression, Bagged Trees Ensemble, Medium Gaussian Support Vector Machine (SVM), excluding SqueezeNet Deep Learning (K = 2000 and K = 1500 for Phase-1 and Phase-2, respectively). In both phases, the five most successful classifiers are determined, and images classify with the help of the Majority Voting (Mathematical Evaluation) method. The application of the proposed method is designed for users to diagnose COVID-19 Positive, Normal, and Pneumonia. The results show that accuracy values obtained by Majority Voting (Mathematical Evaluation) method for Phase-1 and Phase-2 are equal to 99.86 % and 99.28 %, respectively. Thus, it indicates that the accuracy of the whole system is 99.63 %. When we analyze the classification performance metrics for Phase-1 and Phase-2, Specificity (%), Precision (%), Recall (%), F1 Score (%), Area Under Curve (AUC), and Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) are equal to 99.98-99.83-99.07-99.51-0.9974-0.9855 and 99.73-99.69-98.63-99.23-0.9928-0.9518, respectively. Moreover, if the classification performance metrics of the whole system are examined, it is seen that Specificity (%), Precision (%), Recall (%), F1 Score (%), AUC, and MCC are 99.88, 99.78, 98.90, 99.40, 0.9956, and 0.9720, respectively. When the studies in the literature are examined, the results show that the proposed model is better than its counterparts. Because the best performance metrics for the dataset used were obtained in this study. In addition, since the biphasic majority voting technique is used in the study, it is seen that the proposed model is more reliable. On the other hand, although there are tens of thousands of studies on this subject, the usability of these models is debatable since most of them do not have graphical user interface applications. Already, in artificial intelligence technologies, besides the performance of the developed models, their usability is also important. Because the developed models can generally be used by people who are less knowledgeable about artificial intelligence.
Keywords: Bag of features; COVID-19; Deep learning; Machine learning; Majority voting.
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures









Similar articles
-
COVID-19 diagnosis: A comprehensive review of pre-trained deep learning models based on feature extraction algorithm.Results Eng. 2023 Jun;18:101020. doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101020. Epub 2023 Mar 16. Results Eng. 2023. PMID: 36945336 Free PMC article. Review.
-
An integrated framework with machine learning and radiomics for accurate and rapid early diagnosis of COVID-19 from Chest X-ray.Expert Syst Appl. 2021 Oct 15;180:115152. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115152. Epub 2021 May 4. Expert Syst Appl. 2021. PMID: 33967406 Free PMC article.
-
Differentiating novel coronavirus pneumonia from general pneumonia based on machine learning.Biomed Eng Online. 2020 Aug 19;19(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12938-020-00809-9. Biomed Eng Online. 2020. PMID: 32814568 Free PMC article.
-
Deep-chest: Multi-classification deep learning model for diagnosing COVID-19, pneumonia, and lung cancer chest diseases.Comput Biol Med. 2021 May;132:104348. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104348. Epub 2021 Mar 19. Comput Biol Med. 2021. PMID: 33774272 Free PMC article.
-
Class imbalance on medical image classification: towards better evaluation practices for discrimination and calibration performance.Eur Radiol. 2024 Dec;34(12):7895-7903. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10834-0. Epub 2024 Jun 11. Eur Radiol. 2024. PMID: 38861161 Review.
Cited by
-
Tactile-GAT: tactile graph attention networks for robot tactile perception classification.Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 11;14(1):27543. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78764-x. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39528557 Free PMC article.
-
Topological data analysis and machine learning for COVID-19 detection in CT scan lung images.BMC Biomed Eng. 2025 Apr 2;7(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s42490-025-00089-1. BMC Biomed Eng. 2025. PMID: 40170109 Free PMC article.
-
Modeling and control of COVID-19 disease using deep reinforcement learning method.Med Biol Eng Comput. 2024 Dec;62(12):3653-3670. doi: 10.1007/s11517-024-03153-5. Epub 2024 Jun 28. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2024. PMID: 38940880
-
Fabrication of ZnO Nanowire Cold Cathode Flat-Panel X-ray Source with a Reflective Anode.Nanomaterials (Basel). 2024 Sep 16;14(18):1504. doi: 10.3390/nano14181504. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39330661 Free PMC article.
-
Machine Learning and Wearable Technology: Monitoring Changes in Biomedical Signal Patterns during Pre-Migraine Nights.Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Aug 26;12(17):1701. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12171701. Healthcare (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39273725 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ali N., Neagu D., Trundle P. Evaluation of k-nearest neighbour classifier performance for heterogeneous data sets. SN Applied Sciences. 2019;1(12):1–15. doi: 10.1007/s42452-019-1356-9. - DOI
-
- Alkan A. Analysis of knee osteoarthritis by using fuzzy c-means clustering and SVM classification. Scientific Research and Essays. 2011;6(20):4213–4219. doi: 10.5897/sre11.068. - DOI
-
- Alkan A., Akben S.B. Use of K-means clustering in migraine detection by using EEG records under flash stimulation. International Journal of Physical Sciences. 2011;6(4):641–650. doi: 10.5897/IJPS11.174. - DOI
-
- Alkan A., Tuncer S.A., Gunay M. Comparative MR image analysis for thyroid nodule detection and quantification. Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation. 2014;47(1):861–868. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2013.10.009. - DOI
-
- COVID-19 Pandemic (2021). Retrieved May 27, 2021, from https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources