Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb;34(2):302-312.
doi: 10.1111/jce.15791. Epub 2022 Dec 30.

Elevated fibrosis burden as assessed by MRI predicts cryoballoon ablation failure

Affiliations

Elevated fibrosis burden as assessed by MRI predicts cryoballoon ablation failure

Patrick M Boyle et al. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 Feb.

Abstract

Introduction: Late-gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance (LGE-MRI) imaging is increasingly used in management of atrial fibrillation (AFib) patients. Here, we assess the usefulness of LGE-MRI-based fibrosis quantification to predict arrhythmia recurrence in patients undergoing cryoballoon ablation. Our secondary goal was to compare two widely used fibrosis quantification methods.

Methods: In 102 AF patients undergoing LGE-MRI and cryoballoon ablation (mean age 62 years; 64% male; 59% paroxysmal AFib), atrial fibrosis was quantified using the pixel intensity histogram (PIH) and image intensity ratio (IIR) methods. PIH segmentations were completed by a third-party provider as part of the standard of care at our hospital; Image intensity ratio (IIR) segmentations of the same scans were carried out in our lab using a commercially available software package. Fibrosis burdens and spatial distributions for the two methods were compared. Patients were followed prospectively for recurrent arrhythmia following ablation.

Results: Average PIH fibrosis was 15.6 ± 5.8% of the left atrial (LA) volume. Depending on threshold (IIRthr ), the average IIR fibrosis (% of LA wall surface area) ranged from 5.0 ± 7.2% (IIRthr = 1.2) to 37.4 ± 10.9% (IIRthr = 0.97). An IIRthr of 1.03 demonstrated the greatest agreement between the methods, but spatial overlap of fibrotic areas delineated by the two methods was modest (Sorenson Dice coefficient: 0.49). Fourty-two patients (41.2%) had recurrent arrhythmia. PIH fibrosis successfully predicted recurrence (HR 1.07; p = .02) over a follow-up period of 362 ± 149 days; regardless of IIRthr , IIR fibrosis did not predict recurrence.

Conclusions: PIH-based volumetric assessment of atrial fibrosis was modestly predictive of arrhythmia recurrence following cryoballoon ablation in this cohort. IIR-based fibrosis was not predictive of recurrence for any of the IIRthr values tested, and the overlap in designated areas of fibrosis between the PIH and IIR methods was modest. Caution must therefore be exercised when interpreting LA fibrosis from LGE-MRI, since the values and spatial pattern are methodology-dependent.

Keywords: LGE-MRI; atrial fibrillation; atrial fibrosis; cryoballoon ablation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: All the authors indicate no relevant financial relationships or other conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1:
Fig. 1:. Visual summary of the main project elements.
NRR = non-rigid registration, which was used to deform the 3D models reconstructed from segmented IIR images to match the geometry of PIH models to facilitate quantitative comparison of fibrosis spatial patterns.
Fig. 2:
Fig. 2:. Comparison of LA geometry in 3D models reconstructed from IIR and PIH segmentations of the same images.
(A) Data plotted in x-y format with simple linear regression line, as described in text. (B) Same data in truncated violin plot, showing medians (dashed lines) and upper/lower quartiles (dotted lines); Wilcoxon nonparametric test for paired data points (p = 0.9549). (C) Box-and-whisker plots showing point-by-point registration error between IIR and PIH segmentations for each model in the whole cohort.
Fig. 3:
Fig. 3:. Comparison of fibrosis spatial patterns in models reconstructed from PIH and IIR image segmentations.
Columns 2 and 3 show the IIR-derived pattern before and after non-rigid registration (NRR). Regions of spatial overlap are shown in column 4; corresponding Sørensen-Dice Coefficient (SDC) values are shown. In rows A-C, different values of IIRthr are used to delineate fibrosis in IIR-based models. See also maps showing IIR-derived models for all IIRthr values for these cases in Supplemental Fig. 2.
Fig. 4:
Fig. 4:. Quantitative comparison of PIH- vs. IIR-based fibrosis across all models.
(A) Fibrosis surface area for PIH models (column 1) vs. IIR models with different IIRthr values; n = 102 in all columns; Dunn’s multiple comparisons test P<0.0001 for all pairs except as labeled. (B) Sørensen-Dice Coefficient (SDC) for quantification of spatial overlap between fibrosis patterns between PIH models and IIR models with IIRthr values as shown; n = 102 in all columns; Dunn’s multiple comparisons test P<0.0001 for all pairs except as labeled. (C) Patient-by-patient plot showing SDC values for the optimal IIRthr value only for all 102 models. (D) x-y plot showing the relationship between the IIR fibrosis in the optimal-IIRthr model vs. PIH fibrosis for the same individual; same color-coding as in (C). See similar x-y plots for each individual IIRthr value in Supplemental Fig. 3.
Fig. 5:
Fig. 5:. Kaplan Meier survival curves demonstrating time to recurrent atrial arrhythmia in three groups of atrial fibrosis quantified using the PIH method and grouped by previously published stages.
Only one patient had PIH fibrosis >30% and did experience recurrence; this individual is not shown. The log-rank test of equality of survivor functions between stages demonstrated a statistically significant difference in arrhythmia recurrence between the groups (p=0.01).

Comment in

References

    1. January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, Chen LY, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC Jr., Ellinor PT, Ezekowitz MD, Field ME, Furie KL, Heidenreich PA, Murray KT, Shea JB, Tracy CM, Yancy CW. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;74:104–132. - PubMed
    1. Packer DL, Mark DB, Robb RA, Monahan KH, Bahnson TD, Poole JE, Noseworthy PA, Rosenberg YD, Jeffries N, Mitchell LB, Flaker GC, Pokushalov E, Romanov A, Bunch TJ, Noelker G, Ardashev A, Revishvili A, Wilber DJ, Cappato R, Kuck KH, Hindricks G, Davies DW, Kowey PR, Naccarelli GV, Reiffel JA, Piccini JP, Silverstein AP, Al-Khalidi HR, Lee KL, Investigators C. Effect of Catheter Ablation vs Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy on Mortality, Stroke, Bleeding, and Cardiac Arrest Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: The CABANA Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2019;321:1261–1274. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Akoum N, Daccarett M, McGann C, Segerson N, Vergara G, Kuppahally S, Badger T, Burgon N, Haslam T, Kholmovski E, Macleod R, Marrouche N. Atrial fibrosis helps select the appropriate patient and strategy in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a DE-MRI guided approach. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2011;22:16–22. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Oakes RS, Badger TJ, Kholmovski EG, Akoum N, Burgon NS, Fish EN, Blauer JJ, Rao SN, DiBella EV, Segerson NM, Daccarett M, Windfelder J, McGann CJ, Parker D, MacLeod RS, Marrouche NF. Detection and quantification of left atrial structural remodeling with delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2009;119:1758–1767. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Spragg DD, Khurram I, Zimmerman SL, Yarmohammadi H, Barcelon B, Needleman M, Edwards D, Marine JE, Calkins H, Nazarian S. Initial experience with magnetic resonance imaging of atrial scar and co-registration with electroanatomic voltage mapping during atrial fibrillation: success and limitations. Heart Rhythm 2012;9:2003–2009. - PubMed

Publication types