Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May;71(5):1566-1572.
doi: 10.1111/jgs.18213. Epub 2022 Dec 26.

Characterizing caregiving supportive services use by caregiving relationship status

Affiliations

Characterizing caregiving supportive services use by caregiving relationship status

Jasmine L Travers et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 May.

Abstract

Background: Informal caregivers of older adults experience a high degree of psychosocial burden and strain. These emotional experiences often stem from stressful tasks associated with caregiving. Caregiving supportive services that provide assistance for stressful tasks are instrumental in alleviating caregiving burden and strain. Research is limited on what types of supportive services caregivers are utilizing by relationship status and their source of information regarding these services. We sought to characterize caregiving supportive services use by caregiver relationship status.

Methods: We analyzed cross-sectional data from the 2015 National Study of Caregiving limited to caregivers of older adults ≥65 years of age. Caregiver relationship status (i.e., spouse, child, other relative/non-relative) was the independent variable. Type of supportive service and source of information about supportive services were the dependent variables. Bivariate analyses were performed to examine the association with caregiver relationship status and associations between use of caregiving supportive services and caregiver and care recipient characteristics. Among service users, we measured associations between caregiver relationship status, type of supportive services used, and source of information about supportive services.

Results: Our sample consisted of 1871 informal caregivers, 30.7% reported using supportive services. By caregiver relationship status, children had the greatest use of supportive services compared to spouses and other relatives/non-relatives (46.5% vs. 27.6% vs. 25.9%, p = <0.01, respectively). Among users of services, there were no differences in type of services used. Spouses primarily received their information about services from a medical provider or social worker (73.8%, p = <0.001).

Conclusion: Our findings highlight the need to ensure that other caregiving groups, such as spouses and other relatives/non-relatives, have access to important supportive services such as financial support. Medical providers and/or social workers should be leveraged and equipped to provide this information and refer to services accordingly.

Keywords: care partners; caregiving; family; long-term care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose related to this work

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Bivariate Analyses of Supportive Service Use among Caregivers of Community-Dwelling Older Adults with Disabilities, by Caregiver Relationship
Note. 1,871 NSOC caregivers providing assistance to older adults living in the community (excluding residential care and nursing homes). aOther source includes finding information about services from employer due to small cell sizes. Data reflect percentages. **p<0.01; **p<0.001. Spouse n=429 (24.1%); Child n=1021 (50.3%); Other Relative/Non-Relative n=290 (25.6%); weighted n’s = 4,238,904; 8,831,059; 4,491,241, respectively. Caregivers using supportive services: Spouse n=95 (19.5%); Child n=373 (60.2%); Other Relative/Non-Relative n= 106 (20.3%)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Stepler R. 5 Facts About Family Caregivers. Pew Research Center. 2022. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/11/18/5-facts-about-family-ca...
    1. Chari AV, Engberg J, Ray KN, Mehrotra A. The opportunity costs of informal elder-care in the United States: new estimates from the American Time Use Survey. Health Serv Res. Jun 2015;50(3):871–82. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12238 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Garlo K, O'Leary JR, Van Ness PH, Fried TR. Burden in caregivers of older adults with advanced illness. J Am Geriatr Soc. Dec 2010;58(12):2315–22. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03177.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Musich S, Wang SS, Kraemer S, Hawkins K, Wicker E. Caregivers for older adults: Prevalence, characteristics, and health care utilization and expenditures. Geriatr Nurs. Jan - Feb 2017;38(1):9–16. doi:10.1016/j.gerinurse.2016.06.017 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Piersol CV, Canton K, Connor SE, Giller I, Lipman S, Sager S. Effectiveness of Interventions for Caregivers of People With Alzheimer's Disease and Related Major Neurocognitive Disorders: A Systematic Review. Am J Occup Ther. Sep/Oct 2017;71(5):7105180020p1–7105180020p10. doi:10.5014/ajot.2017.027581 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types