Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr;58(2):291-302.
doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14122. Epub 2023 Jan 5.

Inequalities in cesarean births between American Indian & Alaska Native people and White people

Affiliations

Inequalities in cesarean births between American Indian & Alaska Native people and White people

Danielle R Gartner et al. Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To explore population-level American Indian & Alaska Native-White inequalities in cesarean birth incidence after accounting for differences in cesarean indication, age, and other individual-level risk factors.

Data sources and study setting: We used birth certificate data inclusive of all live births within the United States between January 1 and December 31, 2017.

Study design: We calculated propensity score weights that simultaneously incorporate age, cesarean indication, and clinical and obstetric risk factors to estimate the American Indian and Alaska Native-White inequality.

Data collection/extraction methods: Births to individuals identified as American Indian, Alaska Native, or White, and residing in one of the 50 US states or the District of Columbia were included. Births were excluded if missing maternal race/ethnicity or any other covariate.

Principal findings: After weighing the American Indian and Alaska Native obstetric population to be comparable to the distribution of cesarean indication, age, and clinical and obstetric risk factors of the White population, the cesarean incidence among American Indian and Alaska Natives increased to 33.4% (95% CI: 32.0-34.8), 3.2 percentage points (95% CI: 1.8-4.7) higher than the observed White incidence. After adjustment, cesarean birth incidence remained higher and increased in magnitude among American Indian and Alaska Natives in Robson groups 1 (low risk, primary), 6 (nulliparous, breech presentation), and 9 (transverse/oblique lie).

Conclusions: The unadjusted lower cesarean birth incidence observed among American Indian and Alaska Native individuals compared to White individuals may be related to their younger mean age at birth. After adjusting for this demographic difference, we demonstrate that American Indian and Alaska Native individuals undergo cesarean birth more frequently than White individuals with similar risk profiles, particularly within the low-risk Robson group 1 and those with non-cephalic presentations (Robson groups 6 and 9). Racism and bias in clinical decision making, structural racism, colonialism, or other unidentified factors may contribute to this inequality.

Keywords: cesarean; health services; inequality; race; risk factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Observed and propensity‐score weighted cesarean birth incidence estimates (%) and 95% confidence intervals among American Indian & Alaska Native and White (referent, marked with a black square) births, US Natality Files, 2017. Among American Indian and Alaska Native births, the observed cesarean estimate is marked with a dark blue circle. The estimate after weighting by propensity odds is marked with a red asterisk. The White 95% confidence interval is difficult to discern due to the combination of its narrowness and the largeness of the incidence's square marker. Clinical and obstetric risk factors, cesarean birth indication (Robson group), and maternal age were used to calculate weights. Unless otherwise indicated, clinical variables include pre‐existing hypertension, pre‐existing diabetes, and obesity. Obstetric variables include hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (gestational hypertension and eclampsia), gestational diabetes, and fetal macrosomia. Maternal age at the time of birth was measured in years. [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Observed and propensity‐score weighted cesarean birth incidence estimates (%) and 95% confidence intervals among American Indian & Alaska Native and White (referent, marked with a black square) births, by different weighting variables, US Natality Files, 2017. Among American Indian and Alaska Native births, the observed cesarean estimate is marked with a dark blue circle. The estimate after weighting by propensity odds is marked with a red asterisk. Each figure is weighted by a different set of covariates, which are indicated in the box above each figure (A, age; C, clinical risk factors; O, obstetric risk factors; R, Robson group). Clinical variables include pre‐existing hypertension, pre‐existing diabetes, and obesity. Obstetric variables include hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (gestational hypertension and eclampsia), gestational diabetes, and fetal macrosomia. R variables are Robson groups, and age is maternal age at birth. [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. National Center for Health Statistics . Discharges with at Least One Procedure in Nonfederal Short‐Stay Hospitals, by Sex, Age, and Selected Procedures: United States, Selected Years 1990 through 2009–2010. CDC; 2015:Table 90. Accessed June 9, 2016. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/hus/contents2014.htm#090.
    1. Glowicz JB. Serious unintended outcomes associated with cesarean section. Am J Infect Control. 2018;46(4):375‐378. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2017.09.036 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Luca RD, Boulvain M, Irion O, Berner M, Pfister RE. Incidence of early neonatal mortality and morbidity after late‐preterm and term cesarean delivery. Pediatrics. 2009;123(6):e1064‐e1071. doi:10.1542/peds.2008-2407 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mylonas I, Friese K. Indications for and risks of elective cesarean section. Dtsch Ärztebl Int. 2015;112(29–30):489‐495. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2015.0489 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Silver RM. Implications of the first cesarean: perinatal and future reproductive health and subsequent cesareans, placentation issues, uterine rupture risk, morbidity, and mortality. Semin Perinatol. 2012;36(5):315‐323. doi:10.1053/j.semperi.2012.04.013 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types