High resolution 7T MR imaging in characterizing culprit intracranial atherosclerotic plaques
- PMID: 36573263
- PMCID: PMC11833844
- DOI: 10.1177/15910199221145760
High resolution 7T MR imaging in characterizing culprit intracranial atherosclerotic plaques
Abstract
Background: Current imaging modalities underestimate the severity of intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). High resolution vessel wall imaging (HR-VWI) MRI is a powerful tool in characterizing plaques. We aim to show that HR-VWI MRI is more accurate at detecting and characterizing intracranial plaques compared to digital subtraction angiography (DSA), time-of-flight (TOF) MRA, and computed tomography angiogram (CTA).
Methods: Patients with symptomatic ICAD prospectively underwent 7T HR-VWI. We calculated: degree of stenosis, plaque burden (PB), and remodeling index (RI). The sensitivity of detecting a culprit plaque for each modality as well as the correlations between different variables were analyzed. Interobserver agreement on the determination of a culprit plaque on every imaging modality was evaluated.
Results: A total of 44 patients underwent HR-VWI. Thirty-four patients had CTA, 18 TOF-MRA, and 18 DSA. The sensitivity of plaque detection was 88% for DSA, 78% for TOF-MRA, and 76% for CTA. There's significant positive correlation between PB and degree of stenosis on HR-VWI MRI (p < 0.001), but not between PB and degree of stenosis in DSA (p = 0.168), TOF-MRA (p = 0.144), and CTA (p = 0.253). RI had a significant negative correlation with degree of stenosis on HR-VWI MRI (p = 0.003), but not on DSA (p = 0.783), TOF-MRA (p = 0.405), or CTA (p = 0.751). The best inter-rater agreement for culprit plaque detection was with HR-VWI (p = 0.001).
Conclusions: The degree of stenosis measured by intra-luminal techniques does not fully reflect the true extent of ICAD. HR-VWI is a more accurate tool in characterizing atherosclerotic plaques and may be the default imaging modality in clinical practice.
Keywords: 7T; culprit plaques; high-resolution vessel wall imaging; intracranial atherosclerosis; plaque burden.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures
References
-
- Yaghi S, Prabhakaran S, Khatri Pet al. et al. Intracranial atherosclerotic disease. Stroke 2019; 50: 1286–1293. - PubMed
-
- Fakih R, Roa JA, Bathla G, et al. Detection and quantification of symptomatic atherosclerotic plaques with high-resolution imaging in cryptogenic stroke. Stroke 2020; 51: 3623–3631. - PubMed
-
- Mazighi M, Labreuche J, Gongora-Rivera Fet al. et al. Autopsy prevalence of intracranial atherosclerosis in patients with fatal stroke. Stroke 2008; 39: 1142–1147. - PubMed
-
- Mortensen MB, Dzaye O, Steffensen FH, et al. Impact of plaque burden versus stenosis on ischemic events in patients with coronary atherosclerosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020; 76: 2803–2813. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
