Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun;21(2):516-526.
doi: 10.1002/msc.1727. Epub 2022 Dec 27.

The osteoarthritis knowledge scale

Affiliations

The osteoarthritis knowledge scale

Ben Darlow et al. Musculoskeletal Care. 2023 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: Accurate knowledge is central to effective self-care of osteoarthritis (OA). This study aimed to assess the measurement properties of the Osteoarthritis Knowledge Scale (OAKS) with versions for the hip and knee.

Methods: Participants with hip OA (n = 144), knee OA (n = 327), and no OA (n = 735) were recruited. Rasch analysis was conducted to assess psychometric properties using data from all participants with hip OA and 144 randomly selected participants with either knee OA or no OA. Test-retest reliability and measurement error were estimated among those with hip (n = 51) and knee (n = 142) OA.

Results: Four items from the draft scales were deleted following Rasch analysis. The final 11-item OAKS was unidimensional. Item functioning was not affected by gender, age, educational level, or scale version (hip or knee). Person separation index was 0.75. Test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.81 (95% CI 0.74, 0.86; hip version 0.66 [0.47, 0.79]; knee version 0.85 (0.79, 0.90)). Smallest detectable change was 9 points (scale range 11-55; hip OA version 11 points; knee OA version 8 points).

Conclusion: The OAKS is a psychometrically adequate, unidimensional measure of important OA knowledge that can be used in populations with and without hip and knee OA. Caution is needed when using with populations with only hip OA as test-retest reliability of the hip version did not surpass the acceptable range.

Keywords: hip osteoarthritis; knee osteoarthritis; knowledge; patient-reported outcome measure; psychometrics; reproducibility of results.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Ahola, A. J., & Groop, P.-H. (2013). Barriers to self-management of diabetes. Diabetic Medicine, 30(4), 413-420. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.12105
    1. Andrich, D., Sheridan, B., & Luo, G. (2009). RUMM 2030. RUMM Laboratory.
    1. Bannuru, R. R., Osani, M. C., Vaysbrot, E. E., Arden, N. K., Bennell, K., Bierma-Zeinstra, S. M. A., Kraus, V., Lohmander, L., Abbott, J., Bhandari, M., Blanco, F., Espinosa, R., Haugen, I., Lin, J., Mandl, L., Moilanen, E., Nakamura, N., Snyder-Mackler, L., Trojian, T., … & McAlindon, T. E. (2019). OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee, hip, and polyarticular osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 27(11), 1578-1589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2019.06.011
    1. Bland, M. J., & Altman, D. G. (1986). Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet, 327(8476), 307-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8
    1. Broadbent, E., Petrie, K. J., Main, J., & Weinman, J. (2006). The brief illness perception questionnaire. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 60(6), 631-637. https://www.jpsychores.com/article/S0022-3999(05)00491-5/fulltext

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources