Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 1;11(3):351-363.
doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-22-0387.

Infiltration of Tumors Is Regulated by T cell-Intrinsic Nitric Oxide Synthesis

Affiliations

Infiltration of Tumors Is Regulated by T cell-Intrinsic Nitric Oxide Synthesis

Pedro P Cunha et al. Cancer Immunol Res. .

Abstract

Nitric oxide (NO) is a signaling molecule produced by NO synthases (NOS1-3) to control processes such as neurotransmission, vascular permeability, and immune function. Although myeloid cell-derived NO has been shown to suppress T-cell responses, the role of NO synthesis in T cells themselves is not well understood. Here, we showed that significant amounts of NO were synthesized in human and murine CD8+ T cells following activation. Tumor growth was significantly accelerated in a T cell-specific, Nos2-null mouse model. Genetic deletion of Nos2 expression in murine T cells altered effector differentiation, reduced tumor infiltration, and inhibited recall responses and adoptive cell transfer function. These data show that endogenous NO production plays a critical role in T cell-mediated tumor immunity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1. NO production and NOS expression in CD8+ T cells. A, CD8+ T cells were activated with anti-CD3/CD28 Dynabeads (or SIINFEKL peptide, when using OT-I CD8+ T cells) for 1 to 4 days in 21%, 5%, and 1% O2. After activation, NO production and NOS expression were analyzed. B, NO production determined by extracellular quantification of nitrites (NO2−, a NO byproduct) in mouse CD8+ T cells activated for 3 days; N = 11–13. C, Western blot analysis of NOS using a panNOS antibody (all isoforms detected) in lysates of mouse CD8+ T cell activated for 3 days. Results normalized to total protein stain (TPS, top) and representative blot (bottom); N = 3. D, Time course qRT-PCR analysis of Nos2 and Nos3 mRNA expression in activated mouse CD8+ T cells; N = 3–9. E, Western blot analysis of NOS2 protein levels in mouse OT-I CD8+ T cells treated or untreated with 50 μmol/L FG-4592 and activated for 3 days in 1% O2 with increasing amounts of SIINFEKL peptide (0.001, 0.1, 1, and 1000 ng/mL). Quantification normalized to TPS (top) and representative blot (bottom). BMDMs polarized to M1 with 100 U/mL LPS were used as positive control for NOS2 expression; N = 3. F, NO production as determined by extracellular quantification of nitrites in human T cells cultured for 1 day in 21% and 1% O2 with or without anti-CD3/CD28 beads; N = 4. G, Time course qRT-PCR analysis of NOS2 and NOS3 mRNA levels in activated human CD8+ T cells. NOS1 mRNA levels were under the detection limit; N = 5–8. H, Western blot analysis of panNOS (antibody detecting all NOS isoforms) and NOS3 in human CD8+ T cells. HUVEC cells were used as positive control and PPIB was used as loading control; representative of N = 3. Apart from panel D and G, each data point represents an independent animal and results are shown as median ± interquartile range (IQR). *, P < 0.05; Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test.
Figure 1.
NO production and NOS expression in CD8+ T cells. A, CD8+ T cells were activated with anti-CD3/CD28 Dynabeads (or SIINFEKL peptide, when using OT-I CD8+ T cells) for 1 to 4 days in 21%, 5%, and 1% O2. After activation, NO production and NOS expression were analyzed. B, NO production determined by extracellular quantification of nitrites (NO2, a NO byproduct) in mouse CD8+ T cells activated for 3 days (N = 11–13). C, Western blot analysis of NOS using a panNOS antibody (all isoforms detected) in lysates of mouse CD8+ T cell activated for 3 days. Results normalized to total protein stain (TPS, top) and representative blot (bottom; N = 3). D, Time course qRT-PCR analysis of Nos2 and Nos3 mRNA expression in activated mouse CD8+ T cells (N = 3–9). E, Western blot analysis of NOS2 protein levels in mouse OT-I CD8+ T cells treated or untreated with 50 μmol/L FG-4592 and activated for 3 days in 1% O2 with increasing amounts of SIINFEKL peptide (0.001, 0.1, 1, and 1000 ng/mL). Quantification normalized to TPS (top) and representative blot (bottom). BMDMs polarized to M1 with 100 U/mL LPS were used as positive control for NOS2 expression (N = 3). F, NO production as determined by extracellular quantification of nitrites in human T cells cultured for 1 day in 21% and 1% O2 with or without anti-CD3/CD28 beads (N = 4). G, Time course qRT-PCR analysis of NOS2 and NOS3 mRNA levels in activated human CD8+ T cells. NOS1 mRNA levels were under the detection limit (N = 5–8). H, Western blot analysis of panNOS (antibody detecting all NOS isoforms) and NOS3 in human CD8+ T cells. HUVEC cells were used as positive control and PPIB was used as loading control (representative of N = 3). Apart from panel D and G, each data point represents an independent animal and results are shown as median ± interquartile range (IQR). *, P < 0.05; Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test.
Figure 2. Effect of pharmacologic inhibition of NO production by human CD8+ T cells. A, Human CD8+ T cells were activated with anti-CD3/CD28 Dynabeads in 21% O2 and cultured for 3 days in the presence of L-NAME (NOS inhibitor) or NOC-18 (NO donor). Flow cytometry analysis was used to assess the effects on T-cell differentiation and expansion. B–D, Cell number determined with counting beads (B), cell division determined with CTV staining (C), and expression of CD45RO in cells treated with increasing concentrations of L-NAME and NOC-18. Horizontal grey line represents the DMSO control cells (CT). Cell division shown as division index and CD45RO expression shown as log2 fold-change in mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) relative to CT; n = 3. E, NO production determined by quantification of nitrites in lysates of human CD8+ T cells; N = 3. F, Proportion of cells positive for phospho-S6 Ribosomal Protein (Ser235/236, pS6); N = 3. G, Expression of differentiation markers shown as log2 fold-change in MFI relative to DMSO CT (horizontal grey line) following treatment with 200 μmol/L L-NAME; N = 4–10. Results are shown as median ± interquartile range (IQR). *, P < 0.05; *, P < 0.01; Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test.
Figure 2.
Effect of pharmacologic inhibition of NO production by human CD8+ T cells. A, Human CD8+ T cells were activated with anti-CD3/CD28 Dynabeads in 21% O2 and cultured for 3 days in the presence of L-NAME (NOS inhibitor) or NOC-18 (NO donor). Flow cytometry analysis was used to assess the effects on T-cell differentiation and expansion. B–D, Cell number determined with counting beads (B), cell division determined with CTV staining (C), and expression of CD45RO in cells treated with increasing concentrations of L-NAME and NOC-18. Horizontal grey line represents the DMSO control cells (CT). Cell division shown as division index and CD45RO expression shown as log2 fold-change (FC) in mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) relative to CT (N = 3). E, NO production determined by quantification of nitrites in lysates of human CD8+ T cells; N = 3. F, Proportion of cells positive for phospho-S6 Ribosomal Protein (Ser235/236, pS6; N = 3). G, Expression of differentiation markers shown as log2 FC in MFI relative to DMSO CT (horizontal grey line) following treatment with 200 μmol/L L-NAME (N = 4–10). Results are shown as median ± interquartile range (IQR). *, P < 0.05; *, P < 0.01; Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test.
Figure 3. In vitro characterization of Nos2 KO CD8+ T cells. A, After activation in 1% O2 with anti-CD3/CD28 beads, NOS2 expression was determined by Western blot in Nos2fl/fl (WT, gray) and Nos2fl/fldLckCre (NOS2KO, orange) cells. Representative blot (top) and quantification normalized to total protein stain (bottom); median ± interquartile range (IQR), N = 2. B, WT and NOS2KO CD8+ T cells were activated for 3 days in 21% or 1% O2, and NO production was determined by the extracellular nitrite concentration; N = 5–8. C, WT and NOS2KO mouse CD8+ T cells were activated for 72 hours in 21%, 5%, or 1% O2. Viable CD8+ T-cell number was determined by flow cytometry using count beads (left); cell proliferation assessed with CTV staining and expressed as division index (right); N = 8–18. D, Proportion of CD62L−CD44+ in cells activated as in C (left) and representative FACS plots for 1% O2 activated cells (right); N = 11–18. E, Heat map illustrating expression of markers of differentiation determined by flow cytometry in CD8+ T cells activated for 72 hours in 21%, 5%, or 1% O2. Increased and reduced expression of proteins are shown in gray and orange, respectively. Rows represent averaged z-scores; n = 11–18. F, Seahorse metabolic analysis of mouse T cells activated for 3 days in 1% O2, as determined by OCR and ECAR after injection of anti-CD3/CD28 beads or antibodies, oligomycin (O), FCCP (F), or rotenone+antimycin A (R+A; left). Effect of T-cell activation on T-cell OCR and ECAR was determined by % change from baseline following injection of anti-CD3/CD28 beads or antibodies. Seahorse analysis was conducted in a hypoxia chamber set to 3%O2; N = 8. G, OT-I CD8+ T cells activated for 3 days in 1% O2 were cocultured with 10,000 OVA-expressing B16-F10 tumor cells at different effector:target (E:T) ratios. Cytotoxicity was assessed with Alamar blue assay after 14 to 18 hours of coculture at 21% O2. A nonlinear regression [(agonist) vs. normalized response] was used to determine dose–response curves (shaded areas: 95% confidence intervals); N = 4–6. H, CD8+ T cells were activated for 6 days and incubated for 48 hours in 1% O2 before being loaded with calcein-AM and cocultured with mouse endothelial cells in a transwell system. mCCL19 and mCCL21 were added to the lower chamber as chemoattractant. Calcein signal corresponding to T cells migrating through the endothelial barrier was assessed after 3 hours of coculture in a plate reader; N = 7–9. All results [median ± interquartile range (IQR)] are pooled from a minimum of two independent experiments, and each data point from panels B, F (right), and G and H represent an independent animal: ns, P > 0.05; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; Mann–Whitney test relative to respective WT control.
Figure 3.
In vitro characterization of Nos2 KO CD8+ T cells. A, After activation in 1% O2 with anti-CD3/CD28 beads, NOS2 expression was determined by Western blot in Nos2fl/fl (WT, gray) and Nos2fl/fldLckCre (NOS2KO, orange) cells. Representative blot (top) and quantification normalized to total protein stain (bottom; N = 2). B, WT and NOS2KO CD8+ T cells were activated for 3 days in 21% or 1% O2, and NO production was determined by the extracellular nitrite concentration (N = 5–8). C, WT and NOS2KO mouse CD8+ T cells were activated for 72 hours in 21%, 5%, or 1% O2. Viable CD8+ T-cell number was determined by flow cytometry using count beads (left); cell proliferation assessed with CTV staining and expressed as division index (right; N = 8–18). D, Proportion of CD62LCD44+ in cells activated as in C (left) and representative FACS plots for 1% O2 activated cells (right; N = 11–18). E, Heat map illustrating expression of markers of differentiation determined by flow cytometry in CD8+ T cells activated for 72 hours in 21%, 5%, or 1% O2. Increased and reduced expression of proteins are shown in gray and orange, respectively. Rows represent averaged z-scores (N = 11–18). F, Seahorse metabolic analysis of mouse T cells activated for 3 days in 1% O2, as determined by OCR and ECAR after injection of anti-CD3/CD28 beads or antibodies, oligomycin (O), FCCP (F), or rotenone+antimycin A (R+A; left). Effect of T-cell activation on T-cell OCR and ECAR was determined by % change from baseline following injection of anti-CD3/CD28 beads or antibodies. Seahorse analysis was conducted in a hypoxia chamber set to 3%O2 (N = 8). G, OT-I CD8+ T cells activated for 3 days in 1% O2 were cocultured with 10,000 OVA-expressing B16-F10 tumor cells at different effector:target (E:T) ratios. Cytotoxicity was assessed with Alamar blue assay after 14 to 18 hours of coculture at 21% O2. A nonlinear regression [(agonist) vs. normalized response] was used to determine dose–response curves (shaded areas: 95% confidence intervals; N = 4–6). H, CD8+ T cells were activated for 6 days and incubated for 48 hours in 1% O2 before being loaded with calcein-AM and cocultured with mouse endothelial cells in a transwell system. mCCL19 and mCCL21 were added to the lower chamber as chemoattractant. Calcein signal corresponding to T cells migrating through the endothelial barrier was assessed after 3 hours of coculture in a plate reader (N = 7–9). All results [median ± interquartile range (IQR)] are pooled from a minimum of two independent experiments, and each data point from panels B, F (right), and G and H represent an independent animal. ns, P > 0.05; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; Mann–Whitney test relative to respective WT control.
Figure 4. Tumor growth in animals lacking Nos2 expression in T cells. A, Tumor growth model. 5×105 MC38 or B16-F10-OVA were subcutaneously injected in Nos2fl/fl (WT) Nos2fl/fldlckCre (NOS2KO) animals. On day 10 after tumor inoculation, peripheral blood and tumors were processed to single-cell suspensions and analyzed by flow cytometry. Tumor growth was monitored until day 30. B, MC38 (top) and B16-F10-OVA (bottom) tumor growth data. Tumor growth curves in WT and NOS2KO animals; thin lines represent individual animals and thick line represents an exponential (Malthusian) growth curve (left). Survival curves using 500 mm3 as threshold (right). Results pooled from two independent experiments; N = 18–26 animals per group. C, Immune composition was analyzed by flow cytometry on peripheral blood of animals bearing MC38 (top, N = 6–8) and B16-F10-OVA (bottom, N = 13–18) tumors for 10 days. Results expressed as cells per milliliter of blood; median ± interquartile range (IQR). D, Representative flow cytometry plots from CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell infiltration in B16-F10-OVA tumors collected on day 10 following inoculation in WT and NOS2KO animals (top). Immune cell infiltration in B16-F10-OVA analyzed by flow cytometry and expressed as counts per million CD45+ cells (bottom). Cells pre-gated on live, singlet, CD45+ events.; N = 9, median ± IQR. Each data point represents an individual animal; ns, P > 0.05; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.05; log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test relative to WT animals (B) and Mann–Whitney test relative to WT control (C and D).
Figure 4.
Tumor growth in animals lacking Nos2 expression in T cells. A, Tumor growth model. 5×105 MC38 or B16-F10-OVA were subcutaneously injected in Nos2fl/fl (WT) Nos2fl/fldlckCre (NOS2KO) animals. On day 10 after tumor inoculation, peripheral blood and tumors were processed to single-cell suspensions and analyzed by flow cytometry. Tumor growth was monitored until day 30. B, MC38 (top) and B16-F10-OVA (bottom) tumor growth data. Tumor growth curves in WT and NOS2KO animals; thin lines represent individual animals and thick line represents an exponential (Malthusian) growth curve (left). Survival curves using 500 mm3 as threshold (right). Results pooled from two independent experiments (N = 18–26 animals per group). C, Immune composition was analyzed by flow cytometry on peripheral blood of animals bearing MC38 (top; N = 6–8) and B16-F10-OVA (bottom; N = 13–18) tumors for 10 days. Results expressed as cells per milliliter of blood; median ± interquartile range (IQR). D, Representative flow cytometry plots from CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell infiltration in B16-F10-OVA tumors collected on day 10 following inoculation in WT and NOS2KO animals (top). Immune cell infiltration in B16-F10-OVA analyzed by flow cytometry and expressed as counts per million CD45+ cells (bottom). Cells pregated on live, singlet, CD45+ events (N = 9, median ± IQR). Each data point represents an individual animal. ns, P > 0.05; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.05; log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test relative to WT animals (B) and Mann–Whitney test relative to WT control (C and D).
Figure 5. Antitumor function and tissue infiltration capacity of NOS2KO OT-I T cells. A, ACT model. C57BL/6j mice were injected subcutaneously with 1×106 OVA-expressing B16-F10 tumor cells, and 4 days later were lymphodepleted with 300 mg/kg CPA. Mice bearing tumors for 7 days were then intraperitoneally injected with 1×106 of 4 days activated WT or NOS2KO OT-I cells. Tumor growth was monitored every 2 to 3 days until day 60. B, B16-F10-OVA tumor growth after ACT. Tumor growth curves after No ACT or ACT with VC or NOS2KO OT-I cells; vertical dotted lines represent day of ACT, thin lines represent individual animals, and thick lines represent an exponential (Malthusian) growth curve (left). Survival curves using 500 mm3 as threshold (right); N = 9–20 animals per group. C, Tumor infiltration model. C57BL/6j mice were injected subcutaneously with 1×106 OVA-expressing B16-F10 tumor cells, and 11 days later were lymphodepleted with CPA. Mice bearing tumors for 14 days were then intraperitoneally injected with Nos2fl/fl (WT) and Nos2fl/fldlckCre (NOS2KO) OT-I CD8+ T cells (1×106 each in 1:1 NOS2KO:WT ratio). Spleen, peripheral blood, liver, and tumor were harvested on day 19 and processed to single-cell suspensions for flow cytometric analysis. Endogenous and adoptive populations were distinguished by the allelic variants of CD45. D, Total OT-I T-cell expansion in all analyzed tissues expressed as a ratio between NOS2KO and WT cell counts (gray horizontal line represents the NOS2KO/WT ratio at the time of injection); N = 22, median ± interquartile range (IQR). E, Percentage of cells expressing granzyme B (GZMB) within CD8+ T cells in all tissues analyzed by flow cytometry on day 19 (bottom); N = 19–22, median ± IQR. F, Representative FACS plots (left) and flow cytometry analysis (right) of percentage of CD44+CD8+ T cells in peripheral blood on day 19; N = 19–22, median ± IQR. Results are pooled from at least two independent experiments, and each data point represents an independent animal; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test relative to WT animals (B), One sample t test relative to 1 (D) and Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test relative to WT control (E and F).
Figure 5.
Antitumor function and tissue infiltration capacity of NOS2KO OT-I T cells. A, ACT model. C57BL/6j mice were injected subcutaneously with 1×106 OVA-expressing B16-F10 tumor cells, and 4 days later were lymphodepleted with 300 mg/kg CPA. Mice bearing tumors for 7 days were then intraperitoneally injected with 1×106 of 4 days activated WT or NOS2KO OT-I cells. Tumor growth was monitored every 2 to 3 days until day 60. B, B16-F10-OVA tumor growth after ACT. Tumor growth curves after No ACT or ACT with VC or NOS2KO OT-I cells; vertical dotted lines represent day of ACT, thin lines represent individual animals, and thick lines represent an exponential (Malthusian) growth curve (left). Survival curves using 500 mm3 as threshold (right; N = 9–20 animals per group). C, Tumor infiltration model. C57BL/6j mice were injected subcutaneously with 1×106 OVA-expressing B16-F10 tumor cells, and 11 days later were lymphodepleted with CPA. Mice bearing tumors for 14 days were then intraperitoneally injected with Nos2fl/fl (WT) and Nos2fl/fldlckCre (NOS2KO) OT-I CD8+ T cells (1×106 each in 1:1 NOS2KO:WT ratio). Spleen, peripheral blood, liver, and tumor were harvested on day 19 and processed to single-cell suspensions for flow cytometric analysis. Endogenous and adoptive populations were distinguished by the allelic variants of CD45. D, Total OT-I T-cell expansion in all analyzed tissues expressed as a ratio between NOS2KO and WT cell counts (gray horizontal line represents the NOS2KO/WT ratio at the time of injection; N = 22, median ± interquartile range [IQR]). E, Percentage of cells expressing granzyme B (GZMB) within CD8+ T cells in all tissues analyzed by flow cytometry on day 19 (bottom; N = 19–22, median ± IQR). F, Representative FACS plots (left) and flow cytometry analysis (right) of percentage of CD44+CD8+ T cells in peripheral blood on day 19 (N = 19–22, median ± IQR). Results are pooled from at least two independent experiments, and each data point represents an independent animal. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test relative to WT animals (B), one sample t test relative to 1 (D) and Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test relative to WT control (E and F).
Figure 6. In vivo activation and recall response of NOS2KO OT-I CD8+ T cells. A, Scheme of in vivo T-cell activation and recall response model. C57BL/6j mice were injected intraperitoneally with 1×106 naïve Nos2fl/fl (WT) and Nos2fl/fldlckCre (NOS2KO) OT-I CD8+T (1:1 Nos2KO:WT ratio). The next day, mouse BMDMs differentiated for 7 days and polarized with LPS for 24 hours were pulsed with SIINFEKL peptide for 4 hours prior to intraperitoneal injection. Peripheral blood was sampled at days 7 and 10 after BMDM transfer and analyzed by flow cytometry. SIINFEKL-pulsed BMDMs (or PBS controls) were administered again on day 30. At day 37, the spleen, inguinal lymph nodes, and a liver portion were harvested and analyzed by flow cytometry. Endogenous and adoptive populations were distinguished by the allelic variants of CD45. B, OT-I T-cell expansion in peripheral blood expressed as the relative ratio between KO and WT cell counts on days 7 and 10 after BMDM injections (horizontal gray line represents the range of the initial NOS2KO/WT ratio); N = 32–36. C, Percentage of CD62L-CD44+ cells (left) and CD8 and CD127 MFI (right) of WT, KO, and endogenous CD8+ T cells harvested from peripheral blood on day 7; N = 31 (D) Recall response as determined by the ratio between WT and KO OT-I CD8+T-cell infiltration in the spleen, lymph node, and liver 7 days after recall with SIINFEKL-pulsed BMDMs (+) or with PBS control (−). Horizontal gray line represents the range of the initial NOS2KO/WT ratio; N = 17–21. E, Recall response as determined by amount of CD44+ WT and NOS2KO OT-I T cells per million CD45+ cells infiltrated in the spleen, lymph node, and liver 7 days after recall with BMDMs or PBS control; N = 9–18. F, Flow cytometry analysis of CD44 in CD8+ T cells infiltrating the spleen, lymph node, and liver on day 37. All results [median ± interquartile range (IQR)] are pooled from three independent experiments and each data point represents an independent animal; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; One sample t test relative to 1 (B and D), Tukey multiple comparisons paired test (C–F); #, P < 0.05; ##, P < 0.01; ###, P < 0.001; Unpaired t test.
Figure 6.
In vivo activation and recall response of NOS2KO OT-I CD8+ T cells. A, Scheme of in vivo T-cell activation and recall response model. C57BL/6j mice were injected intraperitoneally with 1×106 naïve Nos2fl/fl (WT) and Nos2fl/fldlckCre (NOS2KO) OT-I CD8+T (1:1 NOS2KO:WT ratio). The next day, mouse BMDMs differentiated for 7 days and polarized with LPS for 24 hours were pulsed with SIINFEKL peptide for 4 hours prior to intraperitoneal injection. Peripheral blood was sampled at days 7 and 10 after BMDM transfer and analyzed by flow cytometry. SIINFEKL-pulsed BMDMs (or PBS controls) were administered again on day 30. At day 37, the spleen, inguinal lymph nodes, and a liver portion were harvested and analyzed by flow cytometry. Endogenous and adoptive populations were distinguished by the allelic variants of CD45. B, OT-I T-cell expansion in peripheral blood expressed as the relative ratio between KO and WT cell counts on days 7 and 10 after BMDM injections (horizontal gray line represents the range of the initial NOS2KO/WT ratio; N = 32–36). C, Percentage of CD62L-CD44+ cells (left) and CD8 and CD127 MFI (right) of WT, KO, and endogenous CD8+ T cells harvested from peripheral blood on day 7 (N = 31). D, Recall response as determined by the ratio between WT and KO OT-I CD8+T-cell infiltration in the spleen, lymph node, and liver 7 days after recall with SIINFEKL-pulsed BMDMs (+) or with PBS control (−). Horizontal gray line represents the range of the initial NOS2KO/WT ratio (N = 17–21). E, Recall response as determined by amount of CD44+ WT and NOS2KO OT-I T cells per million CD45+ cells infiltrated in the spleen, lymph node, and liver 7 days after recall with BMDMs or PBS control (N = 9–18). F, Flow cytometry analysis of CD44 in CD8+ T cells infiltrating the spleen, lymph node, and liver on day 37. All results [median ± interquartile range (IQR)] are pooled from three independent experiments and each data point represents an independent animal. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. One sample t test relative to 1 (B and D), Tukey multiple comparisons paired test (CF). #, P < 0.05; ##, P < 0.01; ###, P < 0.001; Unpaired t test.

References

    1. Wink DA, Hanbauer I, Grisham MB, Laval F, Nims RW, Laval J, et al. Chemical biology of nitric oxide: regulation and protective and toxic mechanisms. Curr Top Cell Regul 1996;34:159–87. - PubMed
    1. Bogdan C. Nitric oxide synthase in innate and adaptive immunity: an update. Trends Immunol 2015;36:161–78. - PubMed
    1. Lundberg JO, Gladwin MT, Ahluwalia A, Benjamin N, Bryan NS, Butler A, et al. Nitrate and nitrite in biology, nutrition, and therapeutics. Nat Chem Biol 2009;5:865–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nathan C. Nitric oxide as a secretory product of mammalian cells. FASEB J 1992;6:3051–64. - PubMed
    1. Wei X, Charles IG, Smith A, Ure J, Feng G, Huang F, et al. Altered immune responses in mice lacking inducible nitric oxide synthase. Nature 1995;375:375408a0. - PubMed

Publication types