A Modified Transversal Two-Suture Microsurgical Intussusception Vasoepididymostomy for the Treatment of Epididymal Obstructive Azoospermia
- PMID: 36574758
- DOI: 10.1159/000528391
A Modified Transversal Two-Suture Microsurgical Intussusception Vasoepididymostomy for the Treatment of Epididymal Obstructive Azoospermia
Abstract
Introduction: We have developed a modified vasoepididymostomy procedure, namely "fenestrated" transversal two-suture microsurgical intussusception vasoepididymostomy. This study aimed to investigate the therapeutic efficacy and outcome of this fenestrated vasoepididymostomy for epididymal obstructive azoospermia (OA).
Methods: Microsurgical two-suture transversal intussusception vasoepididymostomy was performed using our modified fenestration technique in 64 OA patients due to epididymal obstruction at our hospital. Fenestration means making an opening on the epididymal tubule wall. The edges of the epididymal tubule "window" were stitched transversally (two stitches) using the two double-armed 9-0 atraumatic sutures. The epididymal tubule was anastomosed to the lumen of the vas deferens. The patency rate and pregnancy rate were assessed.
Results: Of the 64 OA patients, 45 received bilateral microsurgical two-suture transversal intussusception vasoepididymostomy, while 19 underwent unilateral microsurgical two-suture transversal intussusception vasoepididymostomy. All of the patients were followed up after the operation. The follow-up period ranged from 4 to 54 months. Among 45 cases of bilateral surgery, the patency rate was 88.89% (40/45), and the natural pregnancy rate was 28.89% (13/45). After the patency was confirmed postoperatively, 3 cases had recurrent OA, of which 2 cases had return of sperm to the ejaculate by oral antibiotics and scrotal self-massage. As for the 19 cases of unilateral microsurgery, the patency rate was 68.42% (13/19), and the natural pregnancy rate was 21.05% (4/19).
Conclusion: The fenestrated transversal two-suture microsurgical intussusception vasoepididymostomy can achieve a good patency rate in OA patients and did not increase the difficulty and duration of the procedure.
Keywords: Intussusception vasoepididymostomy; Male infertility; Obstructive azoospermia.
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.
Similar articles
-
Two-suture single-armed longitudinal intussusception vasoepididymostomy for obstructive azoospermia: report of patients characteristics and outcome.Int Urol Nephrol. 2014 Dec;46(12):2271-7. doi: 10.1007/s11255-014-0835-6. Epub 2014 Sep 14. Int Urol Nephrol. 2014. PMID: 25218616
-
[Retrospective analysis of factors affecting patency rates and causes of failure in use of single-armed two-suture microsurgical vasoepididymostomy].Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018 Dec 11;98(46):3741-3745. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2018.46.004. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018. PMID: 30541214 Chinese.
-
A modified single-armed microsurgical vasoepididymostomy for epididymal obstructive azoospermia: intraoperative choice and postoperative consideration.BMC Urol. 2020 Aug 12;20(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00692-5. BMC Urol. 2020. PMID: 32787873 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative evaluation of double- and single-armed two-suture longitudinal intussusception techniques in microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2024 Feb 5;19(2):e0298019. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298019. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38315686 Free PMC article.
-
The pregnancy outcomes in patients with epididymal obstructive azoospermia after microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 May 18;10:1186729. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1186729. eCollection 2023. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023. PMID: 37275372 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials