Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 1;12(9):e055031.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055031.

EMAeHealth, a digital tool for the self-management of women's health needs during pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium: protocol for a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study

Collaborators, Affiliations

EMAeHealth, a digital tool for the self-management of women's health needs during pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium: protocol for a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study

Maite Espinosa Cifuentes et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: EHealth can help health service users take a more active role in decision-making and help health professionals guide the patient in this process. A digital tool has been designed to support maternal education (ME), and it is organised into four areas: (1) information, (2) communication, (3) health self-management and (4) clinical data. The main objective of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the EMAeHealth digital tool, and assess its usability and acceptability under routine conditions.

Methods and analysis: Hybrid implementation-effectiveness design: (1) A cluster randomised, prospective, longitudinal, multicentre clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness of EMAeHealth in (A) improving health-related quality of life (primary outcome), (B) improving self-efficacy for labour and childbirth and self-efficacy in breast feeding and (C) reducing the number of visits to the obstetric emergency services and health centre in situations of 'non-pathological pregnancy', 'false labour pains' and 'non-pathological puerperium'. The EMAeHealth intervention plus usual care will be compared with receiving only usual care, which includes traditional ME. N=1080 participants, 540 for each study arm. Two measurements will be made throughout the pregnancy and three in the first 16 weeks post partum. (2) A mixed-method study to evaluate the usability and acceptability of the tool, barriers and facilitators for its use, and implementation in our health system: focus groups (women, professionals and agents involved) and a quantitative analysis of implementation indicators.

Analysis: It will be carried out by intention to treat, using mixed models taking into account the hierarchical structure of the data and per protocol to evaluate the effectiveness of the express use of the digital tool.

Ethics and dissemination: Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Euskadi, Spain, (Ref: PI2020044) approved this study. The results will be actively disseminated through manuscript publications and conference presentations.

Trial registration number: NCT04937049.

Keywords: education & training (see medical education & training); maternal medicine; primary care; quality in health care; telemedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
EMAeHealth design description. ME, maternal education; SF-36, Short Form 36.
Figure 2
Figure 2
EMAeHealth effectiveness flow chart. ME, maternal education; SF-36, Short Form 36.
Figure 3
Figure 3
SPIRIT timetable. ME, maternal education; MS, maternal education; SF 36, Short Form 36; SPIRIT, Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials. **This period is approximate. It depends on the availability of EMAeHealth on the Osakidetza-Basque Health Service corporate website.

References

    1. Gagnon AJ, Sandall J. Individual or group antenatal education for childbirth or parenthood, or both. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007:CD002869. 10.1002/14651858.CD002869.pub2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Antenatal education evidence review Final.docx. Available: https://www.nice.org.uk
    1. Artieta-Pinedo I, Paz-Pascual C, Grandes G, et al. . The benefits of antenatal education for the childbirth process in Spain. Nurs Res 2010;59:194–202. 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181dbbb4e - DOI - PubMed
    1. Billingham K. Preparing for parenthood: the role of antenatal education. Community Pract 2011;84:36–8. - PubMed
    1. McMillan A, Barlow J, Redshaw M, et al. . Birth and beyond: a review of the evidence about antenatal education, 2009. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258369289_Birth_and_beyond_a_re...

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources