Academic Productivity of Equity-Deserving Physician Scholars During COVID-19: A Scoping Review
- PMID: 36576772
- PMCID: PMC9779983
- DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004971
Academic Productivity of Equity-Deserving Physician Scholars During COVID-19: A Scoping Review
Abstract
Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic presented new barriers and exacerbated existing inequities for physician scholars. While COVID-19's impact on academic productivity among women has received attention, the pandemic may have posed additional challenges for scholars from a wider range of equity-deserving groups, including those who hold multiple equity-deserving identities. To examine this concern, the authors conducted a scoping review of the literature through an intersectionality lens.
Method: The authors searched peer-reviewed literature published March 1, 2020, to December 16, 2021, in Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and PubMed. The authors excluded studies not written in English and/or outside of academic medicine. From included studies, they extracted data regarding descriptions of how COVID-19 impacted academic productivity of equity-deserving physician scholars, analyses on the pandemic's reported impact on productivity of physician scholars from equity-deserving groups, and strategies provided to reduce the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on academic productivity of physician scholars from equity-deserving groups.
Results: Of 11,587 unique articles, 44 met inclusion criteria, including 15 nonempirical studies and 29 empirical studies (22 bibliometrics studies, 6 surveys, and 1 qualitative study). All included articles focused on the gendered impact of the pandemic on academic productivity. The majority of their recommendations focused on how to alleviate the burden of the pandemic on women, particularly those in the early stages of their career and/or with children, without consideration of scholars who hold multiple and intersecting identities from a wider range of equity-deserving groups.
Conclusions: Findings indicate a lack of published literature on the pandemic's impact on physician scholars from equity-deserving groups, including a lack of consideration of physician scholars who experience multiple forms of discrimination. Well-intentioned measures by academic institutions to reduce the impact on scholars may inadvertently risk reproducing and sustaining inequities that equity-deserving scholars faced during the pandemic.
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Equity-informed social media COVID-19 risk communication strategies: a scoping review.BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 12;14(8):e085630. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085630. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39134442 Free PMC article.
-
COVID-19 Threatens Progress Toward Gender Equity Within Academic Medicine.Acad Med. 2021 Jun 1;96(6):813-816. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003782. Acad Med. 2021. PMID: 33003040 Free PMC article.
-
Gender, Parenting Status, and the Academic Productivity of Pediatricians During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Hosp Pediatr. 2022 Nov 1;12(11):e379-e388. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2022-006650. Hosp Pediatr. 2022. PMID: 36100981
-
A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Gender and Career Status Differences in the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Underrepresented Postdoctoral Fellows and Early-Career Faculty.Acad Med. 2022 Dec 1;97(12):1824-1831. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004948. Epub 2022 Aug 30. Acad Med. 2022. PMID: 36449920 Free PMC article.
-
A scoping review of opioid harm reduction interventions for equity-deserving populations.Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022 May 11;12:100271. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100271. eCollection 2022 Aug. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022. PMID: 36776426 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Gender, race and ethnicity biases experienced by hospital physicians: an umbrella review to explore emerging biases in the evidence base.BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 16;15(2):e094549. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094549. BMJ Open. 2025. PMID: 39956599 Free PMC article.
-
Faster, higher, stronger - together? A bibliometric analysis of author distribution in top medical education journals.BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Jun;8(6):e011656. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011656. BMJ Glob Health. 2023. PMID: 37321659 Free PMC article.
-
"The genie is out of the bottle": a qualitative study on the impact of COVID-19 on continuing professional development.BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jun 6;24(1):631. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05498-9. BMC Med Educ. 2024. PMID: 38844926 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Zimmer K. Gender gap in research output widens during pandemic. The Scientist. https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/gender-gap-in-research-output.... Published 2020. Accessed August 3, 2022.
-
- Viglione G. Are women publishing less during the pandemic? Here’s what the data say. Nature. 2020;581:365–366. - PubMed
-
- Staniscuaski F, Reichert F, Werneck FP, et al. . Impact of COVID-19 on academic mothers. Science. 2020;368:724–724. - PubMed
-
- Frederickson M. COVID-19’s gendered impact on academic productivity. https://github.com/drfreder/pandemic-pub-bias/blob/master/README.md. Published May 11, 2020. Accessed February 28, 2022.
-
- Amano-Patiño N, Faraglia E, Giannitsarou C, Hasna Z. Who is doing new research in the time of COVID-19? Not the female economists. VOX, CEPR Policy Portal. https://voxeu.org/article/who-doing-new-research-time-covid-19-not-femal.... Published online May 2, 2020. Accessed August 3, 2022.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous