Clinicians' views of factors influencing decision-making for CS for first-time mothers-A qualitative descriptive study
- PMID: 36576912
- PMCID: PMC9797090
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279403
Clinicians' views of factors influencing decision-making for CS for first-time mothers-A qualitative descriptive study
Abstract
Clinicians' perspectives of the reasons for performing caesarean section (CS) are fundamental to deepening knowledge and understanding of factors influencing decision-making for CS. The aim of this study was to explore midwives' and obstetricians' views of factors influencing decision-making for CS for first-time mothers. A qualitative descriptive study with semi-structured one-to-one audio-recorded interviews was used to gather data from clinicians (15 midwives and 20 senior obstetricians). Following research ethics committee approval, clinicians, who were directly involved in the decision-making process for CS during the period of data collection, were purposively selected from three maternity units in the Republic of Ireland between June 2016 to July 2017. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. Three interrelated themes with several subthemes reflective of clinicians' views and experiences emerged following data analysis. These were: 'A fear factor' describing clinicians' fear of adverse outcomes and subsequent litigation, 'Personal preferences versus a threshold-clinician driven factors emphasising the influence of clinicians' personal beliefs, and 'Standardised versus individualised care-a system perspective' explaining the effects of, or lack of, organisational policy and its direct and indirect impact on the decision-making process. Findings show that decisions to perform a CS are, on occasion, based on clinicians' personal beliefs and interpretation, similar to findings from other published literature. Consideration of broader issues related to organisational, socio-cultural and political context is essential when seeking solutions to the rising CS rates. The findings will enable clinicians to reflect on their day-to-day practice, in order to look for modifiable factors that influence their decision-making, and help women understand the multitude of factors that can lead to a decision to perform a CS. Findings will also contribute to the development of the 'next step action' and assist in devising future intervention studies to reduce any unnecessary CSs.
Copyright: © 2022 Panda et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Similar articles
-
Clinicians' views of factors influencing decision-making for caesarean section: A systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies.PLoS One. 2018 Jul 27;13(7):e0200941. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200941. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30052666 Free PMC article.
-
Factors influencing decision-making for caesarean section in Sweden - a qualitative study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Sep 17;18(1):377. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2007-7. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018. PMID: 30223780 Free PMC article.
-
Clinicians' views of factors of importance for improving the rate of VBAC (vaginal birth after caesarean section): a qualitative study from countries with high VBAC rates.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Aug 28;15:196. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0629-6. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015. PMID: 26314295 Free PMC article.
-
Clinicians' views of factors of importance for improving the rate of VBAC (vaginal birth after caesarean section): a study from countries with low VBAC rates.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Nov 10;16(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1144-0. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016. PMID: 27832743 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of women's request and preference on the rising rate of caesarean section - a comparison of reviews.Midwifery. 2020 Sep;88:102765. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102765. Epub 2020 May 29. Midwifery. 2020. PMID: 32531664 Review.
Cited by
-
Navigating the choices of decision-making in cesarean sections: medical and personal perspectives from a qualitative study in Iraq.Pan Afr Med J. 2025 Mar 3;50:65. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2025.50.65.43936. eCollection 2025. Pan Afr Med J. 2025. PMID: 40485998 Free PMC article.
-
How does hospital organisation influence the use of caesarean sections in low- and middle-income countries? A cross-sectional survey in Argentina, Burkina Faso, Thailand and Vietnam for the QUALI-DEC project.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Jan 17;24(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06257-w. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024. PMID: 38233792 Free PMC article.
-
Obstetric Outcomes by Hospital Volume of Operative Vaginal Delivery.JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2453292. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.53292. JAMA Netw Open. 2025. PMID: 39761043 Free PMC article.
-
The influence of emotional labor and emotional intelligence on cesarean section decision-making among midwives and obstetricians in Kosovo: A cross-sectional study using conjoint analysis.Eur J Midwifery. 2025 Jan 17;9. doi: 10.18332/ejm/197168. eCollection 2025. Eur J Midwifery. 2025. PMID: 39830437 Free PMC article.
-
Global increased cesarean section rates and public health implications: A call to action.Health Sci Rep. 2023 May 18;6(5):e1274. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1274. eCollection 2023 May. Health Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37216058 Free PMC article.
References
-
- WHO recommendations: intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Geneva: WHO; 2018. - PubMed
-
- Macfarlane A, Blondel B, Mohangoo A, Cuttini M, Nijhuis J, Novak Z, et al.. Wide differences in mode of delivery within Europe: risk-stratified analyses of aggregated routine data from the Euro-Peristat study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2015;123(4):559–68. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13284 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ye J, Zhang J, Mikolajczyk R, Torloni MR, Gulmezoglu AM, Betran AP. Association between rates of caesarean section and maternal and neonatal mortality in the 21st century: a worldwide population-based ecological study with longitudinal data. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2016;123(5):745–53. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13592 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical