Multicenter retrospective cohort Italian study on elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by the surgical residents
- PMID: 36577814
- DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02738-8
Multicenter retrospective cohort Italian study on elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by the surgical residents
Erratum in
-
Correction to: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Journal.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Feb 16;408(1):92. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02824-5. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023. PMID: 36792843 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Purpose: This retrospective multicenter cohort study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes (mortality rate, operative time, complications) of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) when performed by a surgical resident in comparison to experienced consultant in the backdrop of Italian academic centers.
Methods: Retrospective review of all patients undergoing elective LC between January 2016 and January 2022 at six teaching hospitals across Italy was performed. Cases were identified using the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code 5123 (LC without cholangiogram). All cases of emergency surgery, ASA score > 3, or when cholecystectomy was performed with another surgical procedure, were excluded. All suitable cases were divided into 2 groups based on primary surgeon: consultant or senior resident. Main outcome was complication rates (intraoperative and peri/postoperative); secondary outcomes included operative time, the length of stay, and the rate of conversion to open.
Results: A total of 2331 cases (1425 females) were included, of which, consultants performed 1683 LCs (72%), while the residents performed 648 (28%) surgeries. The groups were statistically comparable regarding demographics, history of previous abdominal surgery, operative time, or intraoperative complications. The rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy was 1.42% for consultant and none for resident (p = 0.02). A statistically significant difference was observed between groups regarding the average length of stay (2.2 ± 3 vs 1.6 ± 1.3 days p = 0.03). Similarly, postoperative complications (1.7% vs 0.5%) resulted in statistically significant (p = 0.02) favoring resident group.
Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that in selected patients, senior residents can safely perform LC when supervised by senior staff surgeons.
Keywords: Elective cholecystectomy; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Operative time; Resident education; Surgical education.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Agresta F, Campanile FC, Vettoretto N, Silecchia G, Bergamini C, Maida P et al. Italian Surgical Societies Working Group (2015) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: consensus conference-based guidelines. Langenbecks Arch Surg 400(4):429-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-015-1300-4
-
- Okamoto K, Suzuki K, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Asbun HJ, Endo I et al (2019) Tokyo Guidelines 2018: flowchart for the management of acute cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 25(1):55–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.516 - DOI
-
- Pisano M, Allievi N, Gurusamy K, Borzellino G, Cimbanassi S, Boerna D et al (2020) 2020 World Society of Emergency Surgery updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute calculus cholecystitis. World J Emerg Surg 15(1):61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-020-00336-x - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Morino M, Festa V, Garrone C, Mabilia MA, Olivieri F (1992) La colecistectomia per via laparoscopica. I nostri primi 70 casi [Cholecystectomy by the laparoscopic route. Our first 70 cases]. Minerva Chir 47(6):375–7 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources