Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jan;29(1):191-195.
doi: 10.1111/nicc.12879. Epub 2022 Dec 28.

Chlorhexidine-based versus non-chlorhexidine dressings to prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections: An evidence-based review

Affiliations
Review

Chlorhexidine-based versus non-chlorhexidine dressings to prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections: An evidence-based review

Anthea Azzopardi et al. Nurs Crit Care. 2024 Jan.

Abstract

In patients with central venous catheters (CVCs) in situ, the development of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) is often linked with increased morbidity and mortality. Sterile gauze or transparent polyurethane dressings are conventionally used as extraluminal barriers; however, antimicrobial chlorhexidine CVC dressings could potentially reduce infection risk. This short evidence-based review examined the literature comparing the effectiveness of chlorhexidine-based CVC dressings against non-chlorhexidine dressings in reducing CRBSI occurrence. Four systematic reviews with meta-analysis were reviewed, all of which reported a statistically significant reduction in CRBSI occurrence on using chlorhexidine-based dressings. Further research is needed to determine the cost-effectiveness of chlorhexidine-based CVC dressings and their effectiveness in reducing CRBSIs in different catheter types and entry sites because infection risk is not uniform.

Keywords: CRBSI; CVC dressing; catheter-related bloodstream infection; central venous catheters; chlorhexidine dressing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). (2015). Healthcare-associated infections acquired in intensive care units. Retrieved from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/portal/files/documents/AER_for_2015-hea...
    1. Stevens V, Geiger K, Concannon C, Nelson R, Brown J, Dumyati G. Inpatient costs, mortality and 30-day re-admission in patients with central-line-associated bloodstream infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20(5):O318-O324.
    1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). (2018). Incidence and Attributable Mortality of Healthcare-Associated Infections in Intensive Care Units in Europe, 2008-2012. ECDC. https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/portal/files/documents/surveillance-rep...
    1. Haddadin Y, Annamaraju P, Regunath H. Central Line Associated Blood Stream Infections. StatPearls Publishing; 2020.
    1. Lim K, Kam P. Chlorhexidine - pharmacology and clinical applications. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2008;36(4):502-512.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources