Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 1;23(12):4169-4176.
doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.12.4169.

Evaluation of Usability and User Experience of Oncodoc 's M-Health Application for Early Detection of Cancer

Respati Wulandari  1 , Eko Adhi Pangarsa  2 , Pulung Nurtantio Andono  3 , Enny Rachmani  4 , Mohamad Sidiq  3 , Maryani Setyowati  4 , Dwi Eko Waluyo  5
Affiliations

Evaluation of Usability and User Experience of Oncodoc 's M-Health Application for Early Detection of Cancer

Respati Wulandari et al. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. .

Abstract

Objective: Cancer is a non-communicable disease that accounts for 71% of deaths globally. The prevalence of people living with cancer in Indonesia increased from 1.4/1000 population (2013) to 1.8/1,000 population (2018). This study aims to evaluate usability, user experience, and user feedback on the use of the Oncodoc m-health application.

Methods: The research method uses mixed methods with a cross-sectional approach and online survey sampling techniques (677 respondents), in December 2021-January 2022 in Indonesia. The instruments used are the System Usability Scale and User Experience Questionnaire. The variables measured include the characteristics of respondents, usability, user experience, and responses to using applications qualitatively. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and the User Experience Questionnaire's analysis tool. Qualitative data were analysed thematically.

Results: Evaluation of the usability of Oncodoc's m-health application is in the "acceptable" category (70.88), and the adjective rating is in the "Good" category. Evaluations of the relative quality of user experience are in the "good" and "very good" types. The average user experience scale is (mean; SD): attractiveness (1.80; 0.99), perspicuity (1.82; 1.05), efficiency (1.78; 1.09), dependability (1.56; 1.01), stimulation (1.81; 1.06), and novelty (1.32; 1.10). The findings of this study are 1) the ability to accommodate user needs, 2) usage barriers, and 3) user expectations for the Oncodoc application.

Conclusion: Overall, the Oncodoc m-health application is acceptable to users. We recommend developing a cancer early detection application with an approach that refers to user needs for further research.

Keywords: Mobile Applications; Telemedicine; Usability; User Experience.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Display between Advance Application Oncodoc
Figure 2
Figure 2
System Usability Scale (SUS) Score (Bangor A et al., 2009)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Benchmark Diagram of UEQ Variables on the Oncodoc Application (Output from Application the Official Website www.ueq-online.org)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Albert B, Tullis T. Measuring the user experience: Collecting, Analyzing, and Presenting Usability Metrics. Newnes. 2013: 47–69.
    1. Anderson K, Burford O, Emmerton L. Mobile health applications to facilitate self-care: A Qualitative Study of User Experience. PLoS One. 2016;11:1–21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anthony Jnr B. Integrating telemedicine to support digital health services in handling the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Healthc Management. 2021;14:280–9.
    1. Bangor A, Kortum P, Miller J. Determining what an individual’s SUS score means: Adding an Adjective Rating Scale. J Usability Study. 2009;4:114–23.
    1. Birur NP, Patrick S, Bajaj S, et al. A new cellular health approach for the early diagnosis of oral cancer. A Contemp Dent Practice. 2018;19:1122–8. - PMC - PubMed