Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 1;5(12):e2248812.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.48812.

Development and Validation of the Perceptions of Research Trustworthiness Scale to Measure Trust Among Minoritized Racial and Ethnic Groups in Biomedical Research in the US

Sarah C Stallings  1   2 , Jennifer Cunningham-Erves  3 , Carleigh Frazier  4 , Jabári S Ichimura  2 , Thelma C Hurd  5   6 , Jordan Jurinsky  6 , Amber Acquaye  6 , Jacquelyn S Dalton  2 , Consuelo H Wilkins  1   2
Affiliations

Development and Validation of the Perceptions of Research Trustworthiness Scale to Measure Trust Among Minoritized Racial and Ethnic Groups in Biomedical Research in the US

Sarah C Stallings et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Historically, trust in biomedical research has been lower among minoritized racial and ethnic groups who are underrepresented in and excluded from research, with the same groups experiencing worse health outcomes. Unfortunately, instruments that measure trust may not capture components of trust relevant to minoritized racial and ethnic groups.

Objective: To develop and validate a scale to measure trust in biomedical research among minoritized racial and ethnic groups.

Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional, community-based survey study compared trust and distrust in biomedical research among Black, Latino, and White subgroups in the US using the Perceptions of Research Trustworthiness (PoRT) scale. The scale was developed between March 22, 2016, and September 19, 2018, as part of this study, and its structure, reliability, and validity were examined during pilot (n = 381) and validation (n = 532) phases between February 4, 2019, and July 27, 2021. Convenience samples of adult participants (aged ≥18 years) were recruited locally (Nashville, Tennessee, and San Antonio, Texas) and nationally through the ResearchMatch and Cint online platforms.

Main outcomes and measures: Overall and individual item Trust and Distrust subscale scores were compared. Overall Trust and Distrust scores were compared by race and ethnicity using a Kruskal-Wallis H test and individual item scores were compared using independent samples t test.

Results: Of the 532 participants in the scale validation study, 144 (27.1%) were Black, 90 (16.9%) were Latino, and 282 (53.0%) were White. Participants had a median age of 43 years (range, 18-90 years), 352 (66.2%) were women, and 198 (37.2%) had educational attainment levels less than a college degree. Factor analysis of the 18-item PoRT scale revealed a 2-factor structure with two 9-item PoRT subscales (Trust and Distrust), which demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.72 and 0.87, respectively). Mean (SD) Trust subscale scores were lower among Black (34.33 [2.02]) and Latino (34.55 [1.97]) participants compared with White participants (36.32 [1.81]; P < .001). Mean (SD) Distrust subscale scores were higher among Black (21.0 [2.15]) and Latino (20.53 [2.21]) participants compared with White participants (18.4 [2.03]; P < .001). Individual item results showed that Black and Latino participants were less trusting and more distrusting than White individuals on items related to risks, harms, secrecy, confidentiality, and privacy.

Conclusions and relevance: These findings suggest that the PoRT scale incorporates trust and trustworthiness concepts relevant among Black and Latino individuals and may allow more precise assessment of trust in research among these groups.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Mr Ichimura reported being supported by grants from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) during the conduct of the study. Dr Wilkins reported receiving grants from the NIH, the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation during the conduct of the study and from the Alzheimer’s Association, American College of Radiology, IBM, and West End Home Foundation outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

References

    1. US Census Bureau . US Census Bureau QuickFacts. Accessed September 16, 2021. http://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045221
    1. Braunstein JB, Sherber NS, Schulman SP, Ding EL, Powe NR. Race, medical researcher distrust, perceived harm, and willingness to participate in cardiovascular prevention trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2008;87(1):1-9. doi:10.1097/MD.0b013e3181625d78 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Coakley M, Fadiran EO, Parrish LJ, Griffith RA, Weiss E, Carter C. Dialogues on diversifying clinical trials: successful strategies for engaging women and minorities in clinical trials. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2012;21(7):713-716. doi:10.1089/jwh.2012.3733 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ford JG, Howerton MW, Lai GY, et al. . Barriers to recruiting underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials: a systematic review. Cancer. 2008;112(2):228-242. doi:10.1002/cncr.23157 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schmotzer GL. Barriers and facilitators to participation of minorities in clinical trials. Ethn Dis. 2012;22(2):226-230. - PubMed

Publication types