Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb:125:107005.
doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2022.107005. Epub 2022 Dec 24.

Ruxolitinib-induced reactivation of cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus in graft-versus-host disease

Affiliations

Ruxolitinib-induced reactivation of cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus in graft-versus-host disease

Delphine Lebon et al. Leuk Res. 2023 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: Steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease (SR-GVHD) is a challenging complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and leads to high morbidity and mortality rates. The orally administered, selective Janus-associated kinase 1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib gives overall response rates (ORR) of more than 70 % in acute and chronic SR-GVHD. However, several studies have highlighted an elevated risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation in patients with ruxolitinib-treated SR-GVHD.

Methods: We therefore analyzed risk of CMV and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) primary infection or reactivation in 57 patients with ruxolitinib-treated GVHD, while taking account of the competing risk (CR) of death prior to the first reactivation.

Results: Initiation of ruxolitinib treatment was a significant adverse prognostic factor for the CR of first CMV reactivation (hazard ratio (HR)= 1.747, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.33-2.92, p < 0.0001) and first EBV reactivation (HR=2.657, 95 % CI: 1.82-3.87, p < 0.0001) during GVHD. In our cohort of ruxolitinib-treated patients, the ORR (48 % and 58 % for acute and chronic GVHD, respectively) and the toxicity profile (haematological adverse events in 29.8 % of the patients) were similar to the literature values.

Conclusion: Given ruxolitinib's efficacy in SR-GVHD, use of this drug should not be limited by the fear of viral reactivation; however, our present results emphasize the importance of monitoring the viral load.

Keywords: CMV reactivation; EBV reactivation; Graft versus host disease; Ruxolitinib.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.

MeSH terms