Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 29;17(1):573.
doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03476-9.

Does matching degree matter for proximal femoral intramedullary nail on reoperation rate in intertrochanteric fractures?

Affiliations

Does matching degree matter for proximal femoral intramedullary nail on reoperation rate in intertrochanteric fractures?

Fei Wang et al. J Orthop Surg Res. .

Abstract

Introduction: Previous articles reported on the tip-apex distance, lag screw placement, fracture pattern, reduction quality, osteoporosis and other factors associated with second surgery. The current study focused on investigating the association of the matching degree between proximal femoral intramedullary nail and femoral medullary cavity on reoperation rate.

Patients and methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted. It included patients with intertrochanteric fracture who were treated with proximal femoral anti-rotatory intramedullary nail (PFNA) between January 2016 and April 2021. The gap between the intramedullary nail and the femoral medullary cavity was equal to the difference in diameter between the two. According to the gap size, all patients were divided into three groups, as follows: high-matching group: gap ≤ 2 mm; middle-matching group: 2 < gap < 4 mm; and low-matching group: gap ≥ 4 mm. The mean gap was measured through standard images. The primary observational index was whether the reoperation was needed, and secondary observational indexes included operative time, length of hospital stay. Patient characteristics were recorded, as follows: age, sex, follow-up time, fracture pattern, reduction grade and length of intramedullary nail.

Results: A total of 203 eligible patients were recorded, including 78 males (38.4%) and 125 females (61.6%). They had a mean age of 77.8 ± 9.9 years old and an average follow-up time of 58.1 ± 24.0 weeks. Twenty-seven patients (13.3%) needed a second operation. Coxa varus combined with screw cutting was the most common reason for reoperation (11 cases). Unstable fracture pattern with poor reduction grade tended to contribute to reoperation, whose odds ratio (OR) was 6.61 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.98-22.09; P = 0.002). The three groups had 11 cases (13.7%), 12 cases (13.8%) and 4 cases (11.1%) of reoperation, respectively, and logistic regression showed no significant association was noted between matching degree of intramedullary nail and reoperation rate.

Conclusions: The matching degree between proximal femoral intramedullary nail and femoral medullary cavity did not seem to be an important factor for reoperation, which offered more options of intramedullary nail size intraoperatively and reduced implants stock from inventory.

Keywords: Gap; Intertrochanteric fracture; Matching degree; Reoperation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient screening flowchart
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a AP radiograph. b Lateral radiograph. The diameter of femoral medullary cavity was measured at the layer where the medullary cavity was most fully filled with the distal nail.

References

    1. Hu SJ, Chang SM, Ma Z, et al. PFNA-II protrusion over the greater trochanter in the Asian population used in proximal femoral fractures. Indian J Orthop. 2016;50(6):641–646. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.193475. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adeyemi A, Delhougne G. Incidence and economic burden of intertrochanteric fracture: a medicare claims database analysis. JB JS Open Access. 2019;4(1):e0045. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.18.00045. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liu Y, Tao R, Liu F, et al. Mid-term outcomes after intramedullary fixation of peritrochanteric femoral fractures using the new proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) Injury. 2010;41(8):810–817. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.03.020. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Socci AR, Casemyr NE, Leslie MP, et al. Implant options for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip: rationale, evidence, and recommendations. Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B(1):128–133. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0134.R1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brunner A, Jockel JA, Babst R. The PFNA proximal femur nail in treatment of unstable proximal femur fractures–3 cases of postoperative perforation of the helical blade into the hip joint. J Orthop Trauma. 2008;22(10):731–736. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181893b1b. - DOI - PubMed