Trends of intrauterine device insertion and 'Googling' about intrauterine devices before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia
- PMID: 36583085
- PMCID: PMC9793017
- DOI: 10.1177/20552076221145799
Trends of intrauterine device insertion and 'Googling' about intrauterine devices before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia
Abstract
Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted access to primary care in Australia. This could have negatively impacted reproductive health services rates such as intrauterine device insertion rates, and interest in seeking information about intrauterine devices by searching on Google. We aimed to assess the trends of, and the association between, the actual Medicare service utilization rates for intrauterine device insertion and searching about intrauterine devices on Google, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods: We conducted systematic analyses of secondary data from June 2017 to May 2022, using Medicare and Google Trends data sources. We visualized the rates of intrauterine device insertion, plus Google's search volumes about 'Intrauterine device' and 'Progestin IUDs' as topics. Then, we assessed the correlation between intrauterine device insertion rates and Google search, using Spearman correlation.
Results: The average yearly rates of intrauterine device insertion increased noticeably from 25.1-26.3 in 2018-2019 to 29.3-31.2 per 100,000 population in 2020-2021 (12-18% increase). The highest monthly intrauterine device insertion rate nationally (37 per 100,000 population) was seen in March 2021. By June 2020, search term use for the two intrauterine device-related topics returned to much higher levels (50% increase for 'Progestin IUDs', and 54% for 'Intrauterine device', respectively). A moderately strong correlation was seen between actual intrauterine device insertion rates and search on Google about intrauterine devices (Spearman rho = 0.61, p < 0.000).
Conclusion: We demonstrated a moderately strong correlation between trends of intrauterine device insertion rates and search on Google about intrauterine devices, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia. Googling about intrauterine devices could, therefore, be a useful indicator to gauge future interest in actual intrauterine device insertion for months thereafter.
Keywords: Australia; Correlation of data; Intrauterine devices; Levonorgestrel; Search engine.
© The Author(s) 2022.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.Prescrire Int. 2009 Jun;18(101):125-30. Prescrire Int. 2009. PMID: 19637436
-
Online public interest in common malignancies and cancer screening during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.J Clin Transl Res. 2021 Nov 6;7(6):723-732. eCollection 2021 Dec 28. J Clin Transl Res. 2021. PMID: 34901518 Free PMC article.
-
Two years' experience with two levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices and one copper-releasing intrauterine device: a randomized comparative performance study.Fertil Steril. 1983 Feb;39(2):187-92. Fertil Steril. 1983. PMID: 6401636 Clinical Trial.
-
Expulsion of intrauterine devices after postpartum placement by timing of placement, delivery type, and intrauterine device type: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):177-188. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.045. Epub 2020 Mar 3. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 32142826 Free PMC article.
-
Pain Perception during Levonorgestrel-releasing Intrauterine Device Insertion in Nulliparous Women: A Systematic Review.J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2018 Dec;31(6):549-556.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2018.05.008. Epub 2018 Jun 8. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 29890206
References
-
- Surgeons ACo. COVID-19: Recommendations for Management of Elective Surgical Procedures 2020 [updated March 13, 2020; cited 2021 February 28]. Available from: https://www.facs.org/covid-19/clinical-guidance/elective-surgery.
-
- Scott A. The impact of COVID-19 on GPs and non-GP specialists in private practice. Melbourne Institute: Applied Economic & Social Research; 2020 2020.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources