Sonographic peripheral nerve cross-sectional area in adults, excluding median and ulnar nerves: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 36583383
- DOI: 10.1002/mus.27783
Sonographic peripheral nerve cross-sectional area in adults, excluding median and ulnar nerves: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Introduction/aims: Although electromyography remains the "gold standard" for assessing and diagnosing peripheral nerve disorders, ultrasound has emerged as a useful adjunct, providing valuable anatomic information. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the normative sonographic values for adult peripheral nerve cross-sectional area (CSA).
Methods: Medline and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for healthy adult peripheral nerve CSA, excluding the median and ulnar nerves. Data were meta-analyzed, using a random-effects model, to calculate the mean nerve CSA and its 95% confidence interval (CI) for each nerve at a specific anatomical location (= group).
Results: Thirty groups were identified and meta-analyzed, which comprised 16 from the upper extremity and 15 from the lower extremity. The tibial nerve (n = 2916 nerves) was reported most commonly, followed by the common fibular nerve (n = 2580 nerves) and the radial nerve (n = 2326 nerves). Means and 95% confidence interval (CIs) of nerve CSA for the largest number of combined nerves were: radial nerve assessed at the spiral groove (n = 1810; mean, 5.14 mm2 ; 95% CI, 4.33 to 5.96); common fibular nerve assessed at the fibular head (n = 1460; mean, 10.18 mm2 ; 95% CI, 8.91 to 11.45); and common fibular nerve assessed at the popliteal fossa (n = 1120; mean, 12.90 mm2 ; 95% CI, 9.12 to 16.68). Publication bias was suspected, but its influence on the results was minimal.
Discussion: Two hundred thirty mean CSAs from 15 857 adult nerves are included in the meta-analysis. These are further categorized into 30 groups, based on anatomical location, providing a comprehensive reference for the clinician and researcher investigating adult peripheral nerve anatomy.
Keywords: adult; anatomy; nerve cross-sectional area; normative values; ultrasound imaging.
© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Comment in
-
The use and misuse of sonographic reference values in neuromuscular disease.Muscle Nerve. 2023 Jul;68(1):1-3. doi: 10.1002/mus.27834. Epub 2023 Apr 27. Muscle Nerve. 2023. PMID: 37102440 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Gonzalez NL, Hobson-Webb LD. Neuromuscular ultrasound in clinical practice: a review. Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2019;4:148-163. doi:10.1016/j.cnp.2019.04.006
-
- Alemán L, Berná JD, Reus M, Martínez F, Doménech-Ratto G, Campos M. Reproducibility of sonographic measurements of the median nerve. J Ultrasound Med. 2008;27:193-197. doi:10.7863/jum.2008.27.2.193
-
- Alshami AM, Cairns CW, Wylie BK, Souvlis T, Coppieters MW. Reliability and size of the measurement error when determining the cross-sectional area of the tibial nerve at the tarsal tunnel with ultrasonography. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009;35:1098-1102. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2009.01.011
-
- Kluge S, Kreutziger J, Hennecke B, Vögelin E. Inter- and intraobserver reliability of predefined diagnostic levels in high-resolution sonography of the carpal tunnel syndrome---a validation study on healthy volunteers. Ultraschall Der Medizin Stuttgart Ger. 1980;2009(31):43-47. doi:10.1055/s-0028-1109570
-
- Haun DW, Cho JCS, Kettner NW. Normative cross-sectional area of the C5-C8 nerve roots using ultrasonography. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010;36:1422-1430. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.05.012
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources