Psychosocial factors and hippocampal subfields: The Medea-7T study
- PMID: 36583397
- PMCID: PMC9980899
- DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26185
Psychosocial factors and hippocampal subfields: The Medea-7T study
Abstract
Specific subfields within the hippocampus have shown vulnerability to chronic stress, highlighting the importance of looking regionally within the hippocampus to understand the role of psychosocial factors in the development of neurodegenerative diseases. A systematic review on psychosocial factors and hippocampal subfield volumes was performed and showed inconsistent results, highlighting the need for future studies to explore this relationship. The current study aimed to explore the association of psychosocial factors with hippocampal (subfield) volumes, using high-field 7T MRI. Data were from the Memory Depression and Aging (Medea)-7T study, which included 333 participants without dementia. Hippocampal subfields were automatically segmented from T2-weighted images using ASHS software. Generalized linear models accounting for correlated outcomes were used to assess the association between subfields (i.e., entorhinal cortex, subiculum, Cornu Ammonis [CA]1, CA2, CA3, dentate gyrus, and tail) and each psychosocial factor (i.e., depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, childhood maltreatment, recent stressful life events, and social support), adjusted for age, sex, and intracranial volume. Neither depression nor anxiety was associated with specific hippocampal (subfield) volumes. A trend for lower total hippocampal volume was found in those reporting childhood maltreatment, and a trend for higher total hippocampal volume was found in those who experienced a recent stressful life event. Among subfields, low social support was associated with lower volume in the CA3 (B = -0.43, 95% CI: -0.72; -0.15). This study suggests possible differential effects among hippocampal (subfield) volumes and psychosocial factors.
Keywords: MRI; anxiety; depression; early life adversity; hippocampus; psychosocial.
© 2022 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures


References
-
- Acosta, H. , Jansen, A. , & Kircher, T. (2021). Larger bilateral amygdalar volumes are associated with affective loss experiences. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 99(7), 1763–1779. - PubMed
-
- Aghamohammadi‐Sereshki, A. , Coupland, N. J. , Silverstone, P. H. , Huang, Y. , Hegadoren, K. M. , Carter, R. , Seres, P. , & Malykhin, N. V. (2021). Effects of childhood adversity on the volumes of the amygdala subnuclei and hippocampal subfields in individuals with major depressive disorder. Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience, 46(1), E186–e195. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Ahmed‐Leitao, F. , Rosenstein, D. , Marx, M. , Young, S. , Korte, K. , & Seedat, S. (2019). Posttraumatic stress disorder, social anxiety disorder and childhood trauma: Differences in hippocampal subfield volume. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 284, 45–52. - PubMed
-
- Ahmed‐Leitao, F. , Spies, G. , van den Heuvel, L. , & Seedat, S. (2016). Hippocampal and amygdala volumes in adults with posttraumatic stress disorder secondary to childhood abuse or maltreatment: A systematic review. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 256, 33–43. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous