Eight-year trajectories of malalignment progression in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis
- PMID: 36583920
- PMCID: PMC9945354
- DOI: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002044
Eight-year trajectories of malalignment progression in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis
Abstract
Background: Although various therapies have been developed to treat malalignment in osteoarthritic knees, the pattern of malalignment progression is still unclear. This study aimed to identify homogeneous subgroups with distinct trajectories of malalignment progression in subjects with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and to determine corresponding risk factors.
Methods: Eight-year follow-up (from 2004 to 2012) data on 1252 participants with symptomatic KOA from the Osteoarthritis Initiative were included. Varus/valgus angle progression was characterized by group-based trajectory models. Time-varying covariates were introduced into the model to investigate how they affected trajectories. Multinomial logistic regression for trajectory group membership was applied to ascertain risk factors.
Results: Five subgroups were identified. Participants in the varus worsening trajectory (n = 166) or valgus worsening trajectory (n = 118) proceeded to worsen malalignment over time. The neutral trajectory (n = 378), varus stable trajectory (n = 328), and valgus stable trajectory (n = 262) maintained close to the initial varus/valgus angle over 8 years. Higher baseline Kellgren and Lawrence grade (odds ratio [OR] = 4.35, P < 0.001 for varus; OR = 3.85, P < 0.001 for valgus) and "severe" baseline malalignment (OR = 13.57, P < 0.001 for varus; OR = 23.04, P < 0.001 for valgus) were risk factors for worsening trajectories. The cutoff point of the baseline varus/valgus angle to discriminate between stable or worsening trajectory was -4.5° for varus and 3.6° for valgus.
Conclusions: This study identified the malalignment progression pattern - minor malalignment (-4.5° to +3.6°) tends to remain stable, while major baseline malalignment is likely to progress. This provides a reference for therapy to prevent malalignment from deteriorating and emphasizes the necessity of determining the trigger factors for malalignment onset.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00080171.
Copyright © 2022 The Chinese Medical Association, produced by Wolters Kluwer, Inc. under the CC-BY-NC-ND license.
Conflict of interest statement
None.
Figures
References
-
- Sharma L, Song J, Felson D, Cahue S, Shamiyeh E, Dunlop D. The role of knee alignment in disease progression and functional decline in knee osteoarthritis. JAMA 2001; 286:188–195. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.2.188. - PubMed
-
- Felson DT, Niu J, Gross KD, Englund M, Sharma L, Cooke TD, et al. . Valgus malalignment is a risk factor for lateral knee osteoarthritis incidence and progression: findings from the multicenter osteoarthritis study and the osteoarthritis initiative. Arthritis Rheum 2013; 65:355–362. doi: 10.1002/art.37726. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Felson DT, Goggins J, Niu J, Zhang Y, Hunter DJ. The effect of body weight on progression of knee osteoarthritis is dependent on alignment. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 50:3904–3909. doi: 10.1002/art.20726. - PubMed
-
- Sharma L, Dunlop DD, Cahue S, Song J, Hayes KW. Quadriceps strength and osteoarthritis progression in malaligned and lax knees. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138:613–619. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-1388-200304150-00006. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources