High incidence of clinical fragility fractures in postmenopausal women with rheumatoid arthritis. A case-control study
- PMID: 36584785
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2022.116654
High incidence of clinical fragility fractures in postmenopausal women with rheumatoid arthritis. A case-control study
Abstract
Objectives: To estimate the incidence of clinical fragility fractures in postmenopausal women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and analyze risk factors for fracture.
Methods: Incidence of clinical fragility fractures in 330 postmenopausal women with RA was compared to that of a control population of 660 age-matched postmenopausal Spanish women. Clinical fractures during the previous five years were recorded. We analyzed associations with risk factors for fracture in both populations and with disease-related variables in RA patients.
Results: Median age of RA patients was 64 years; median RA duration was eight years. Sixty-nine percent were in remission or on low activity. Eighty-five percent had received glucocorticoids (GCs); 85 %, methotrexate; and 40 %, ≥1 biologic DMARD. Fifty-four patients and 47 controls had ≥1 major osteoporotic fracture (MOF). Incidence of MOFs was 3.55 per 100 patient-year in patients and 0.72 in controls (HR: 2.6). Risk factors for MOFs in RA patients were age, previous fracture, parental hip fracture, years since menopause, BMD, erosions, disease activity and disability, and cumulative dose of GCs. Previous fracture in RA patients was a strong risk for MOFs (HR: 10.37).
Conclusion: Of every 100 postmenopausal Spanish women with RA, 3-4 have a MOF per year. This is more than double that of the general population. A previous fracture poses a high risk for a new fracture. Other classic risk factors for fracture, RA disease activity and disability, and the cumulative dose of GCs are associated with fracture development.
Keywords: Fracture; Fracture incidence; Fracture risk; Osteoporosis; Rheumatoid arthritis.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest Dr. Gomez-Vaquero has received fees for lectures and/or advice from Amgen, BMS, Eli Lilly, Gedeon-Richter, Grünenthal, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Stada and UCB. Dr. Hernandez received grant funding and fees for lectures from Amgen and MSD. Dr. Olmos has received past fees for lectures from Amgen, Eli Lilly, Stada and Gedeon-Richter. Dr. Naranjo has received past fees for lectures and/or advice from Amgen and UCB. Dr. Castañeda has received fees for lectures and/or advice from Amgen, BMS, Eli- Lilly, Gedeon-Richter, Grünenthal, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Stada and UCB. Dr. Garcia-Vadillo has received past fees for lectures from Amgen, Eli Lilly, UCB, Stada and Gedeon-Richter. Dr. Aguado Acin has received fees for lectures and/or advice from Abbie, Alexion, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Eli Lilly, Faes, Gedeon-Richter, GP Pharm, Kyowa Kirin, MSD, Rubió and Theramex. Dr. Castellanos-Moreira has received past fees for lectures and/or advice from Pfizer, Lilly, UCB and BMS. Dr. Tebe has received fees for lectures from Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Gedeon Richter. Dr. Guañabens has received past fees for lectures and/or advice from Alexion, Amgen, Eli Lilly and UCB. The remaining authors have no competing interests to disclose.

