Microbial adhesion and viability on novel CAD/CAM framework materials for implant-supported hybrid prostheses
- PMID: 36585796
- DOI: 10.1111/eos.12911
Microbial adhesion and viability on novel CAD/CAM framework materials for implant-supported hybrid prostheses
Abstract
The aim of the study was to investigate the adhesion and viability of Streptococcus oralis and Candida albicans under in vitro conditions on CAD/CAM framework materials for implant-supported hybrid prostheses. Twenty-nine specimens were prepared from each of three different materials: ZR (zirconia), PEEK (polyether ether ketone) and CoCr4 (CoCr4 alloy). The experimental part included surface roughness (SR) and contact angle of water (CAW) measurements, followed by colony forming unit (CFU), cell viability assay and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses of Strep. oralis and C. albicans biofilms on the materials' surfaces. Kruskal-Wallis and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests were used for differences between materials, and the correlation between measurements was estimated using Spearman's correlation coefficient. PEEK specimens revealed higher SR, CAW and CFU mean values, than ZR and CoCr4 specimens. Strong positive correlation was found between SR and CFU and between CAW and CFU for both microbial species. Cell viability assay revealed similar values for both species across materials. Higher numbers of Strep. oralis and C. albicans on PEEK specimens confirm the impact of the higher surface roughness and contact angle values on the microbial adhesion and describes PEEK as less desirable than ZR and CoCr4 from microbiological aspect.
Keywords: colony forming unit; contact angle; scanning electron microscopy; surface roughness.
© 2022 Scandinavian Division of the International Association for Dental Research. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Delucchi F, De GE, Pesce P, Bagnasco F, Pera F, Baldi D, et al. Framework Materials for Full-Arch Implant-Supported Rehabilitations: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies. Materials. 2021;14:3251. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14123251
-
- Menini M, Pesce P, Pera F, Barberis F, Lagazzo A, Bertola L, et al. Biological and mechanical characterization of carbon fiber frameworks for dental implant applications. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017;70:646-55.
-
- Malo P, Nobre MDA, Borges J, Almeida R. Retrievable metalceramic implant-supported fixed prostheses with milled titanium frameworks and all-ceramic crowns: Retrospective clinical study with up to 10 years of follow-up. J Prosthodont. 2012;21:256-64.
-
- Guess PC, Att W, Strub JR. Zirconia in fixed implant prosthodontics. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013;14:633-45.
-
- Zoidis P. The all-on-4 modified polyetheretherketone treatment approach: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119:516-21.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
