Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Feb;25(2):107-113.
doi: 10.1007/s11912-022-01353-6. Epub 2022 Dec 31.

Management of Stage III Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Light of the New Staging System: a Critical Review

Affiliations
Review

Management of Stage III Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Light of the New Staging System: a Critical Review

Leandro Luongo Matos et al. Curr Oncol Rep. 2023 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients have a poor prognosis, especially in advanced stages. AJCC/UICC staging system 8th edition (TNM8) included depth of invasion (DOI) as part of T staging and stage III has become a heterogeneous group of lesions, composed of patients with larger DOI and/or width. Additionally, stage III includes N1, regardless of the primary tumor width or DOI. The real prognostic value of each of these characteristics and the need for adjuvant treatment for stage III patients is not well established.

Recent findings: TNM8 stratified OSCC into prognostic groups based on overall survival. Extranodal extension, positive or close margins, pT3 or pT4 tumors, pN2 or pN3 nodal disease, nodal disease in levels IV or V, perineural invasion, vascular invasion, and lymphatic invasion are the main adverse features for OSCC, and adjuvant treatment is largely recommended for these patients. Stage III patients should be addressed with caution. So far, there is no significant evidence for recommending or excluding adjuvant treatment for stage III OSCC without adverse features. The authors largely recommend adjuvant radiotherapy for these cases, especially because pT3 without adverse features is rare. Further studies on this topic are necessary.

Keywords: Lymph node metastasis; Neoplasm staging; Oral neoplasms; Prognosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(1):7–33.
    1. Pinto FR, Matos LL, Gumz Segundo W, Vanni CM, Rosa DS, Kanda JL. Tobacco and alcohol use after head and neck cancer treatment: influence of the type of oncological treatment employed. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2011;57(2):171–6.
    1. Leite AK, de Matos LL, Belli M, Kulcsar MA, Cernea CR, Garcia Brandão L, et al. Pectoralis major myocutaneous flap for head and neck reconstruction: risk factors for fistula formation. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2014;34(6):389–93.
    1. Amin MB, Edge SB, Greene FL, Byrd DR, Brookland RK, Washington MK, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual. 8th ed. Chicago: Springer; 2017.
    1. • Almangush A, Pirinen M, Youssef O, Mäkitie AA, Leivo I. Risk stratification in oral squamous cell carcinoma using staging of the eighth American Joint Committee on Cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Head Neck. 2020;42(10):3002–17. Systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrating the better risk stratification of AJCC8 for oral cancer in a robust aggregate data.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources