Metaphase-II oocyte competence is unlinked to the gonadotrophins used for ovarian stimulation: a matched case-control study in women of advanced maternal age
- PMID: 36586005
- PMCID: PMC9840736
- DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02684-w
Metaphase-II oocyte competence is unlinked to the gonadotrophins used for ovarian stimulation: a matched case-control study in women of advanced maternal age
Abstract
Purpose: An impact of different gonadotrophins selection for ovarian stimulation (OS) on oocyte competence has yet to be defined. In this study, we asked whether an association exists between OS protocol and euploid blastocyst rate (EBR) per metaphase-II (MII) oocytes.
Methods: Cycles of first preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies conducted by women ≥ 35 years old with their own metaphase-II oocytes inseminated in the absence of severe male factor (years 2014-2018) were clustered based on whether recombinant FSH (rec-FSH) or human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) was used for OS, then matched for the number of fresh inseminated eggs. Four groups were outlined: rec-FSH (N = 57), rec-FSH plus rec-LH (N = 55), rec-FSH plus HMG (N = 112), and HMG-only (N = 127). Intracytoplasmic sperm injection, continuous blastocyst culture, comprehensive chromosome testing to assess full-chromosome non-mosaic aneuploidies and vitrified-warmed euploid single embryo transfers (SETs) were performed. The primary outcome was the EBR per cohort of MII oocytes. The secondary outcome was the live birth rate (LBR) per first SETs.
Results: Rec-FSH protocol was shorter and characterized by lower total gonadotrophin (Gn) dose. The linear regression model adjusted for maternal age showed no association between the Gn adopted for OS and EBR per cohort of MII oocytes. Similarly, no association was reported with the LBR per first SETs, even when adjusting for blastocyst quality and day of full blastulation.
Conclusion: In view of enhanced personalization in OS, clinicians shall focus on different endpoints or quantitative effects related to Gn action towards follicle recruitment, development, and atresia. Here, LH and/or hCG was administered exclusively to women with expected sub/poor response; therefore, we cannot exclude that specific Gn formulations may impact patient prognosis in other populations.
Keywords: Euploid blastocyst; Gonadotrophin; Live birth; Oocyte competence; Ovarian stimulation.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Oocyte competence is independent of the ovulation trigger adopted: a large observational study in a setting that entails vitrified-warmed single euploid blastocyst transfer.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 Jun;38(6):1419-1427. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02124-1. Epub 2021 Mar 4. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021. PMID: 33661465 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of blastocyst euploidy rates following luteal versus follicular phase stimulation in a GnRH antagonist protocol: a prospective study with repeated ovarian stimulation cycles.Hum Reprod. 2022 Nov 24;37(12):2777-2786. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac222. Hum Reprod. 2022. PMID: 36269092
-
Luteal phase anovulatory follicles result in the production of competent oocytes: intra-patient paired case-control study comparing follicular versus luteal phase stimulations in the same ovarian cycle.Hum Reprod. 2018 Aug 1;33(8):1442-1448. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey217. Hum Reprod. 2018. PMID: 29912374 Free PMC article.
-
Opening the black box: why do euploid blastocysts fail to implant? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Hum Reprod Update. 2023 Sep 5;29(5):570-633. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmad010. Hum Reprod Update. 2023. PMID: 37192834
-
The influence of the pharmaceutical industry on the development of gonadotrophins and ovarian stimulation protocols in assisted reproductive technologies.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 4;16:1536844. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1536844. eCollection 2025. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025. PMID: 40255498 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Surfing follicular waves in ovarian stimulation: is there a role for LH in DuoStim protocols? A narrative review and SWOT analysis.Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025 Feb 25;23(Suppl 1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12958-025-01360-9. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025. PMID: 39994627 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The effect of male factors on embryo morphokinetics: a retrospective analysis of 2726 blastocysts.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 Dec;41(12):3467-3475. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03275-7. Epub 2024 Oct 7. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024. PMID: 39370476
-
Exploring the Impact of Controlled Ovarian Stimulation and Non-Invasive Oocyte Assessment in ART Treatments.Life (Basel). 2023 Sep 29;13(10):1989. doi: 10.3390/life13101989. Life (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37895371 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Drakopoulos P, Blockeel C, Stoop D, Camus M, de Vos M, Tournaye H, et al. Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos? Hum Reprod. 2016;31(2):370–6. 10.1093/humrep/dev316. - PubMed
-
- Magnusson A, Kallen K, Thurin-Kjellberg A, Bergh C. The number of oocytes retrieved during IVF: a balance between efficacy and safety. Hum Reprod. 2017:1–7. 10.1093/humrep/dex334. - PubMed
-
- Rienzi L, Cimadomo D, Vaiarelli A, Gennarelli G, Holte J, Livi C, et al. Measuring success in IVF is a complex multidisciplinary task: time for a consensus? Reprod Biomed Online. 2021;43(5):775–8. 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.08.012. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources