Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2023 Jul 1;116(3):544-550.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.12.032. Epub 2022 Dec 28.

A Multicenter Prospective Trial of Electronic Skin Surface Brachytherapy for Keratinocyte Carcinoma: Early Cosmesis, Quality of Life, and Adverse Events

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

A Multicenter Prospective Trial of Electronic Skin Surface Brachytherapy for Keratinocyte Carcinoma: Early Cosmesis, Quality of Life, and Adverse Events

Alyce M Kuo et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. .

Abstract

Purpose: Keratinocyte carcinomas are amenable to many treatments, including radiation therapy (RT). Electronic skin surface brachytherapy (ESSB) enables the precise delivery of radiation without radioisotopes. In this prospective multicenter clinical trial, we characterized early outcomes of ESSB prospectively through both patient- and clinician-reported measures. To corroborate the cosmesis observations, we also assessed patient-reported quality of life (QoL) and adverse events.

Methods and materials: Patients ≥60 years old with stage T1N0M0 keratinocyte carcinoma were treated with ESSB. At 2-, 6-, and 12-weeks post-treatment, cosmesis from ESSB was assessed by both the patient and a clinician study investigator as either "good," "fair," or "bad." The Skindex-16 and the Skin Cancer Index (SCI) were used to assess patient QoL before and after treatment. Adverse events were assessed using the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0.

Results: Cosmesis and QoL were collected at 97% (99/102) of possible patient follow-up times. By 12 weeks post-treatment, 93.9% (31/33) of patient-reported and 96.9% (31/32) of clinician-reported cosmesis outcomes were "good." Compared with baseline, total Skindex-16 score significantly deteriorated at 2 weeks post-treatment (10.5 vs 24.5, P <.001), but significantly improved at 6 weeks (10.5 vs 4.7, P = .014) and 12 weeks (10.5 vs 2.1, P = .001) post-treatment. The total SCI score significantly improved from baseline to 6 weeks (78.4 vs 89.0, P = .001) post-treatment. The most frequent adverse events were radiation dermatitis, skin pain, and pruritus. All adverse events resolved to Grade ≤1 by 12 weeks post-treatment.

Conclusions: This prospective, multicenter study demonstrated that ESSB is associated with a high rate of "good" early patient-reported cosmesis and increasing QoL and satisfaction with time. Validated assessments demonstrated a significant improvement in quality of life and resolution of moderate early adverse events by 6 to 12 weeks after treatment and corroborate the observation of favorable cosmesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Statement for All Authors

EHL has received grants from the American College of Mohs Surgery Foundation and royalties from UpToDate. AR is a consultant for Evolve CME, Almirall, Merz, Dynamed, Canfield Scientific, Evolus, Biofrontera, Quantia MD, Lam Therapeutics, Regeneron, and Cutera, has received travel support from Mavig and L’Oreal, is an advisor for Skinfix and Allergan Inc, is the founder of DAR companies, has received grants and research funding from ASLMS, Skin Cancer Foundation, Regen, LeoPharma, and Biofrontera, is on the editorial board of Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, CUTIS, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (JAAD), Dermatologic Surgery, and is a board member of ASDS and committee member and/or chair of AAD, ASDS, and ASLMS. GC has received MSKCC funding from Alpha Tau Medical in support of his post-doctoral research. MZ has received consulting fees from Alpha Tau Medical and serves as Editor in Chief for Brachytherapy. MEK discloses that his institution was loaned an early version of the ESTEYA machine for use during the trial, which was promptly returned and no patients were treated off trial. CAB has received honoraria from Regeneron.

AMK, KN, MC, AS, ML, and ZZ have no disclosures.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
A patient treated with ESSB at pre-treatment and 2, 6, and 12 weeks post-treatment.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Patient and clinician assessed cosmesis over time.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Plots of adverse events graded using CTCAE, version 4.0, over time. No skin atrophy was reported at any time point.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Patient satisfaction over time.

Similar articles

References

    1. Nehal KS, Bichakjian CK. Update on Keratinocyte Carcinomas. N Engl J Med 2018;379(4):363–374. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1708701. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thomson J, Hogan S, Leonardi-Bee J, Williams HC, Bath-Hextall FJ. Interventions for basal cell carcinoma of the skin. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020;11:CD003412. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003412.pub3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lansbury L, Bath-Hextall F, Perkins W, Stanton W, Leonardi-Bee J. Interventions for non-metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the skin: systematic review and pooled analysis of observational studies. BMJ 2013;347:f6153. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f6153. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shah C, Ouhib Z, Kamrava M, et al. The American Brachytherapy society consensus statement for skin brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 2020;19(4):415–426. DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.04.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Albert A, Knoll MA, Conti JA, Zbar RIS. Non-Melanoma Skin Cancers in the Older Patient. Curr Oncol Rep 2019;21(9):79. DOI: 10.1007/s11912-019-0828-9. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types