Voting and (im)moral behavior
- PMID: 36587028
- PMCID: PMC9805423
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-24360-w
Voting and (im)moral behavior
Abstract
Due to diffusion of responsibility, majority voting may induce immoral and selfish behavior because voters are rarely solely responsible for the outcome. Across three behavioral experiments (two preregistered; n = 1983), we test this hypothesis in situations where there is a conflict between morality and material self-interest. Participants were randomly assigned to make decisions about extracting money from a charity either in an experimental referendum or individually. We find no evidence that voting induces immoral behavior. Neither do we find that people self-servingly distort their beliefs about their responsibility for the outcome when they vote. If anything, the results suggest that voting makes people less immoral.
© 2022. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Falk A, Szech N. Diffusion of being pivotal and immoral outcomes. Rev. Econ. Stud. 2020;87:2205–2229. doi: 10.1093/restud/rdz064. - DOI
-
- Kirchler M, Huber J, Stefan M, Sutter M. Market design and moral behavior. Manag. Sci. 2016;62:2615–2625. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2015.2246. - DOI
-
- Behnk, S., Hao, L. & Reuben, E. Partners in crime: Diffusion of responsibility in antisocial behaviors. IZA Institute of Labor Economics DP No. 11031 (2017).
