Subcutaneous C.E.R.A. for the Maintenance Treatment of Anemia in Pediatric Patients With CKD: A Phase 2, Open-Label, Single-Arm, Multicenter Study
- PMID: 36587890
- DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2022.11.006
Subcutaneous C.E.R.A. for the Maintenance Treatment of Anemia in Pediatric Patients With CKD: A Phase 2, Open-Label, Single-Arm, Multicenter Study
Abstract
Rationale & objective: The optimum starting dose of intravenous continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (C.E.R.A.) has been previously determined; this study ascertains the optimum starting dose of subcutaneous C.E.R.A. administration in pediatric patients.
Study design: Phase 2, open-label, single-arm, multicenter study.
Setting & participants: Patients aged 3 months to 17 years with renal anemia and chronic kidney disease (CKD; including those treated with maintenance dialysis and those not treated with dialysis) who were receiving maintenance treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs).
Intervention: Subcutaneous C.E.R.A. administration every 4 weeks (starting dose was based on defined conversion factors).
Outcome: The primary outcome was the change in hemoglobin concentration between the baseline and evaluation period for each patient. Secondary efficacy measures and safety were also evaluated.
Results: Forty patients aged 0.4-17.7 years were enrolled. The study achieved its primary outcome: the mean change in hemoglobin concentration was an increase of 0.48g/dL; the 95% confidence interval (0.15-0.82) and standard deviation (±1.03) were within the prespecified boundaries (-1 to 1g/dL and<1.5g/dL, respectively). Mean hemoglobin concentrations were maintained within the target 10-12g/dL range in 24 of 38 patients and within±1g/dL of the baseline in 19 of 38 patients, and the median C.E.R.A. subcutaneous dose decreased over time. Efficacy in key subgroups (age group, dialysis type, prior ESA treatment) was consistent with the primary outcome. Thirty-eight patients completed the core period; 25 chose to enter the safety extension period. Safety was consistent with prior studies, with no new signals.
Limitations: Single-arm and open-label study; small sample size.
Conclusions: Pediatric patients with anemia secondary to CKD who were on, or not on, dialysis could be safely and effectively switched from maintenance ESAs to subcutaneous C.E.R.A. administered every 4 weeks, using defined dose-conversion factors to determine the optimum starting dose.
Funding: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
Trial registration: The SKIPPER trial registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with study number NCT03552393.
Plain-language summary: Anemia, a complication of chronic kidney disease, is associated with poor quality of life and an increased risk of hospitalization and mortality. The current treatments for anemia include iron therapy and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs); however, the relatively short half-lives of the ESAs epoetin alfa/beta or darbepoetin alfa may require more frequent dosing and hospital visits compared with the ESA known as continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (C.E.R.A.). A previous study demonstrated that children aged 5 years or more with anemia associated with chronic kidney disease who were on hemodialysis could be switched to intravenous C.E.R.A. from their existing epoetin alfa/beta or darbepoetin alfa treatment. This study provides evidence that subcutaneous C.E.R.A. can safely and effectively treat anemia in children, including those aged<5 years and regardless of whether they were on dialysis or the type of dialysis they received (peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis).
Keywords: Anemia; Mircera; chronic kidney disease (CKD); continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (C.E.R.A.); dialysis; drug dosing; erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA); hemoglobin; injection pain; methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta; pediatric; subcutaneous.
Copyright © 2023 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Efficacy and Long-Term Safety of C.E.R.A. Maintenance in Pediatric Hemodialysis Patients with Anemia of CKD.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018 Jan 6;13(1):81-90. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03570417. Epub 2017 Nov 2. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018. PMID: 29097481 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Empirical methods to calculate an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent dose conversion ratio in nondialyzed patients with chronic kidney disease.J Manag Care Pharm. 2009 Nov-Dec;15(9):741-50. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2009.15.9.741. J Manag Care Pharm. 2009. PMID: 19954265 Free PMC article.
-
Anemia Treatment by Erythropoiesis-stimulating Agents during the 6 Months before the Initiation of Hemodialysis: Comparison of Darbepoetin Alfa and Continuous Erythropoietin Receptor Activator.Keio J Med. 2017 Sep 26;66(3):44-50. doi: 10.2302/kjm.2016-0009-OA. Epub 2016 Dec 19. Keio J Med. 2017. PMID: 27990008
-
Differentiating factors between erythropoiesis-stimulating agents: an update to selection for anaemia of chronic kidney disease.Drugs. 2013 Feb;73(2):117-30. doi: 10.1007/s40265-012-0002-2. Drugs. 2013. PMID: 23338536 Review.
-
Comparative efficacy and safety in ESA biosimilars vs. originators in adults with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Nephrol. 2018 Jun;31(3):321-332. doi: 10.1007/s40620-017-0419-5. Epub 2017 Jun 23. J Nephrol. 2018. PMID: 28646375
Cited by
-
Anemia Management in Pediatric Chronic Kidney Disease: Current Challenges and Treatment Strategies.Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2025 Apr;41(2):228-237. doi: 10.1007/s12288-024-01955-z. Epub 2025 Jan 8. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2025. PMID: 40224709 Review.
-
Real-world evidence on the dosing and safety of C.E.R.A. in pediatric dialysis patients: findings from the International Pediatric Dialysis Network registries.Pediatr Nephrol. 2024 Mar;39(3):807-818. doi: 10.1007/s00467-023-05977-z. Epub 2023 Aug 11. Pediatr Nephrol. 2024. PMID: 37566114 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical