Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 2;24(1):1.
doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-06059-1.

Patients' and clinicians' perspectives towards primary care consultations for shoulder pain: qualitative findings from the Prognostic and Diagnostic Assessment of the Shoulder (PANDA-S) programme

B Saunders  1 , C Burton  2 , D A van der Windt  2 , H Myers  2   3 , R Chester  4 , T Pincus  5 , G Wynne-Jones  2
Affiliations
Free PMC article

Patients' and clinicians' perspectives towards primary care consultations for shoulder pain: qualitative findings from the Prognostic and Diagnostic Assessment of the Shoulder (PANDA-S) programme

B Saunders et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: Clinical management of musculoskeletal shoulder pain can be challenging due to diagnostic uncertainty, variable prognosis and limited evidence for long-term treatment benefits. The UK-based PANDA-S programme (Prognostic And Diagnostic Assessment of the Shoulder) is investigating short and long-term shoulder pain outcomes. This paper reports linked qualitative research exploring patients' and clinicians' views towards primary care consultations for shoulder pain.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 patients and 15 primary care clinicians. Twenty-two interviews (11 patients, 11 clinicians) were conducted as matched patient-clinician 'dyads'. Data were analysed thematically.

Results: Clinicians reported attempts to involve patients in management decisions; however, there was variation in whether patients preferred treatment choice, or for decisions to be clinician-led. Some patients felt uncertain about the decisions made, due to a lack of discussion about available management options. Many General Practitioners expressed a lack of confidence in diagnosing the underlying cause of shoulder pain. Patients reported either not being given a diagnosis, or receiving different diagnoses from different professionals, resulting in confusion. Whilst clinicians reported routinely discussing prognosis of shoulder pain, patients reported that prognosis was not raised. Patients also expressed concern that their shoulder pain could be caused by serious pathology; however, clinicians felt that this was not a common concern for patients.

Conclusions: Findings showed disparities between patients' and clinicians' views towards shoulder pain consultations, indicating a need for improved patient-clinician communication. Findings will inform the design of an intervention to support treatment and referral decisions for shoulder pain that will be tested in a randomised controlled trial.

Keywords: Diagnosis; General practice; Primary care; Prognosis; Qualitative; Shoulder pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Phys Ther. 2021 Mar 3;101(3): - PubMed
    1. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jul;96(28):e7529 - PubMed
    1. BMJ Open. 2013 Sep 26;3(9):e003452 - PubMed
    1. BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 17;11(9):e052758 - PubMed
    1. J Rehabil Med. 2014 Oct;46(9):898-907 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources