Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar;32(3):408-417.
doi: 10.1002/pon.6087. Epub 2023 Jan 11.

Understanding social network support, composition, and structure among cancer caregivers

Affiliations

Understanding social network support, composition, and structure among cancer caregivers

Elizabeth G Bouchard et al. Psychooncology. 2023 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: We examined the social network support, composition, and structure of pediatric cancer caregivers.

Methods: We used a self-report survey to collect egocentric social network data from 107 caregivers of pediatric cancer patients and calculated descriptive statistics to examine cancer-related support network composition, function, and structure. We then ran logistic regressions to examine the relationships between network characteristics and overall satisfaction with social support.

Results: Family members were the most common source of emotional support and logistical support, and health care providers were the most common source of informational support. Participants perceived the "most helpful" forms of support as being: (1) emotional support from family and health care providers; (2) informational support from health care providers and other cancer caregivers; and (3) logistical support from family. Overall, caregivers wished that 9.8% of their network ties had provided more support, with family members being the most common alter type to disappoint caregivers and offer less support than needed/expected. Caregivers who reported higher network disappointment (having network members who offered less support than needed/expected) were significantly less satisfied with emotional support than those with lower network disappointment (Odds Ratio = 0.18, p = 0.02), and caregivers with higher network disappointment were significantly less satisfied with logistical support compared to those with lower network disappointment (Odds Ratio = 0.14, p = 0.01).

Conclusion: Our results show differences in the nature of social support provided by different types of network members. These findings have implications for tailoring social network interventions to improve caregiver and family outcomes.

Keywords: cancer; caregiving; oncology; social network; social support.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Fletcher PC My child has cancer: finding the silver lining in every mother’s worst nightmare. Issues in Comprehensive Paediatric Nursing 34, 40–55 (2011). - PubMed
    1. Trask PC, Paterson AG, Trask CL, Bares CB, Birt J, & Maan C. Parent and adolescent adjustment to paediatric cancer: associations with coping, social support, and family function. Journal of Paediatric Oncology Nursing 20, 36–47 (2003). - PubMed
    1. Long KA & Marsland AL Family adjustment to childhood cancer: a systematic review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review 14, 57–88 (2011). - PubMed
    1. Hoekstra-Weebers JE, Jaspers JP, Kamps WA & Klip EC Risk factors for psychological maladjustment of parents of children with cancer. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 38, 1526–1535, doi: 10.1097/00004583-199912000-00014 (1999). - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hoekstra-Weebers JE, Wijnberg-Williams BJ, Jaspers JP, Kamps WA & van de Wiel HB Coping and its effect on psychological distress of parents of pediatric cancer patients: a longitudinal prospective study. Psychooncology 21, 903–911, doi: 10.1002/pon.1987 (2012). - DOI - PubMed

Publication types