In vitro comparison of the color degradation of two computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing provisional materials: A 12-month simulation
- PMID: 36588373
- PMCID: PMC10088442
- DOI: 10.4103/jips.jips_119_22
In vitro comparison of the color degradation of two computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing provisional materials: A 12-month simulation
Abstract
Aim: This study evaluated the color aging of two computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) provisional materials of different compositions (polymethyl methacrylate and composite resin) after exposure to thermal aging and immersion in coffee for 3, 6, and 12 intraoral months.
Setting and design: The current in vitro study was conducted from September to December 2021 at the Craniofacial laboratory at the Saint Joseph University in Beirut, Lebanon.
Materials and methods: The shades of 2.0 mm thick, 10.0 mm in diameter disk shaped specimens of VITA CAD Temp® and Ceramill® TEMP were measured using the VITA Linearguide 3D MASTER® and a conversion table to extract the CIE LFNx01aFNx01bFNx01 values on a white background (n = 30).
Statistical analysis used: The color differences ΔE at 3, 6, and 12 months were calculated and analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA followed by Bonferroni multiple comparisons, univariate analyses, and one sample t tests.
Results: The mean ΔET1/T0, ΔET2/T0, and ΔET3/T0 values were significantly higher than the cutoff values for acceptability and perceptibility for the VITA CAD Temp® and the Ceramill® TEMP groups. In addition, the increase in ΔE overtime was significantly greater in the Ceramill® TEMP group compared to the VITA CAD Temp® group.
Conclusions: The Ceramill® TEMP changed color more and faster than the VITA CAD Temp®. In addition, whether at 3, 6, or 12 months, the color variations of both materials are not only perceptible but also unacceptable compared to the initial shade.
Keywords: Color; composite resin; computer-aided manufacturing/computer-aided manufacturing; in vitro; materials; polymethyl methacrylate; stability; temporary.
Conflict of interest statement
None
Figures
References
-
- Gratton DG, Aquilino SA. Interim restorations. Dent Clin North Am. 2004;48:i487–97. - PubMed
-
- Perry RD, Magnuson B. Provisional materials: Key components of interim fixed restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2012;33:59–60. 62. - PubMed
-
- Comisi JC. Provisional materials: Advances lead to extensive options for clinicians. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2015;36:54. 56-9. - PubMed
-
- Rayyan MM, Aboushelib M, Sayed NM, Ibrahim A, Jimbo R. Comparison of interim restorations fabricated by CAD/CAM with those fabricated manually. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114:414–9. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
