Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 16;3(6Part B):731-735.
doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2022.07.012. eCollection 2022 Dec.

Feasibility and safety of a transvenous lead extraction program implementation in South America: Challenges, early outcomes, and global collaboration-A single-center experience

Pablo Salazar  1 , Armando Pérez-Silva  1 , Alex Villablanca  1 , Francisco Bello  1 , Osvaldo Pérez  1 , Andrew Beaser  2 , Hemal Nayak  2
Affiliations

Feasibility and safety of a transvenous lead extraction program implementation in South America: Challenges, early outcomes, and global collaboration-A single-center experience

Pablo Salazar et al. Heart Rhythm O2. .

Abstract

Background: Transvenous lead extraction is the standard of care for cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) malfunction/infection-related removal. However, data on its performance and results in underdeveloped countries are limited.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to report the feasibility and efficacy of a lead extraction program in a tertiary hospital in Chile, South America.

Methods: Patients requiring CIED removal at the Electrophysiology Division of the Hospital las Higuera's were retrospectively analyzed. Outcomes including procedure-related mortality, procedural success and failure, and cardiac and vascular complications were reported.

Results: A total of 15 patients were analyzed (median age 68 [interquartile range 52-75] years; 80% male). Patients with lead extraction difficulty index >10 represented 33% of patients. Infection was the indication for removal in all patients, with pocket infection (80%). Mechanical rotational tools were used in 66% of cases, and a total of 29 leads were removed. Procedural success was accomplished in 93% of cases. There was 1 (7%) intraprocedural complication and no procedure-related mortality.

Conclusions: The development of a lead management program is feasible, safe, and effective in underdeveloped countries.

Keywords: Electrophysiology; Lead complications; Lead extraction; Lead management; South America.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of removed leads. A: Leads removed according to location. B: Leads removed according to fixation mechanism. C: Leads removed according to type. ICD = implantable cardioverter–defibrillator.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Sohail M.R., Henrikson C.A., Braid-Forbes M.J., Forbes K.F., Lerner D.J. Mortality and cost associated with cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:1821–1828. - PubMed
    1. Lee J.Z., Majmundar M., Kumar A., et al. Impact of timing of transvenous lead removal on outcomes in infected cardiac implantable electronic devices. Heart Rhythm. 2022;19:768–775. - PubMed
    1. Kusumoto F.M., Schoenfeld M.H., Wilkoff B.L., et al. 2017 HRS expert consensus statement on cardiovascular implantable electronic device lead management and extraction. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14:e503–e551. - PubMed
    1. Bontempi L., Vassanelli F., Cerini M., et al. Predicting the difficulty of a transvenous lead extraction procedure: validation of the LED index. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2017;28:811–818. - PubMed
    1. Krainski F., Pretorius V., Birgersdotter-Green U. A practical approach to lead removal: transvenous tools and techniques. Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2018;10:637–650. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources