Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 14:13:1080416.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1080416. eCollection 2022.

Aboveground herbivory does not affect mycorrhiza-dependent nitrogen acquisition from soil but inhibits mycorrhizal network-mediated nitrogen interplant transfer in maize

Affiliations

Aboveground herbivory does not affect mycorrhiza-dependent nitrogen acquisition from soil but inhibits mycorrhizal network-mediated nitrogen interplant transfer in maize

Chenling He et al. Front Plant Sci. .

Abstract

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are considered biofertilizers for sustainable agriculture due to their ability to facilitate plant uptake of important mineral elements, such as nitrogen (N). However, plant mycorrhiza-dependent N uptake and interplant transfer may be highly context-dependent, and whether it is affected by aboveground herbivory remains largely unknown. Here, we used 15N labeling and tracking to examine the effect of aboveground insect herbivory by Spodoptera frugiperda on mycorrhiza-dependent N uptake in maize (Zea mays L.). To minimize consumption differences and 15N loss due to insect chewing, insect herbivory was simulated by mechanical wounding and oral secretion of S. frugiperda larvae. Inoculation with Rhizophagus irregularis (Rir) significantly improved maize growth, and N/P uptake. The 15N labeling experiment showed that maize plants absorbed N from soils via the extraradical mycelium of mycorrhizal fungi and from neighboring plants transferred by common mycorrhizal networks (CMNs). Simulated aboveground leaf herbivory did not affect mycorrhiza-mediated N acquisition from soil. However, CMN-mediated N transfer from neighboring plants was blocked by leaf simulated herbivory. Our findings suggest that aboveground herbivory inhibits CMN-mediated N transfer between plants but does not affect N acquisition from soil solutions via extraradical mycorrhizal mycelium.

Keywords: Zea mays; common mycorrhizal networks; insect herbivory; mycorrhiza; nitrogen.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mycorrhizal symbiosis promotes the growth and nutrient uptake of maize plants. Maize plants were inoculated with Rhizophagus irregularis (Rir) and cultivated in self-designed boxes (A). Five weeks post-Rir inoculation, maize plant roots were harvested for the measurement of mycorrhizal root colonization rate (B) and mycorrhizal observation by wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) fluorescence staining (C) (bar scale: 25 μm). Plant height (D), leaf area (E), and dry weight (F) were measured, followed by the analysis of phosphorus content (G), ZmPht1;6 (a mycorrhizal symbiosis marker gene in maize) expression (H), nitrogen content (I) and N transporter gene expressions (J–L). For analysis of root colonization, n = 6; plant height and leaf area, n = 20; dry weight, n = 10; nitrogen content, n = 5; phosphorus content, n = 8; expression of ZmPht1;6 and N transporter genes, n = 3. Data are means ± SE. Asterisks at the top of the bars indicate statistical significance (Student’s t-test, *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001; ns, no significance). NM, non-mycorrhizal maize plants; AM, arbuscular mycorrhizal maize plants.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mycorrhiza-mediated nitrogen uptake from soil by maize plants. Maize plants were inoculated with the mycorrhizal fungus Rhizophagus irregularis (Rir) and cultivated in the boxes with a PVC core in each box (A). Five weeks post Rir inoculation, the PVC core was injected with (15NH4)2SO4 solution, and was then either rotated daily (for the purpose of damaging the mycelium) or non-rotated (intact for maintaining mycelial contact to labeling 15N). Plants were harvested to measure the root colonization rate (B) and the accumulation of shoot 15N (C) and root 15N (D) ten days after labeling N injection. For the analysis of root colonization, n = 6; 15N accumulation, n = 4. Data are the means ± SE of biological replicates. Asterisks indicate significant differences (Student’s t-test, *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001; ns, no significance).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mycorrhiza-mediated nitrogen uptake from soil by maize plants is independent of aboveground herbivory. Maize plants were inoculated with Rir and were cultivated in self-designed boxes, with a PVC core in each box as illustrated in experiment III. Five weeks post Rir inoculation, the PVC core was injected with (15NH4)2SO4 solution, and was then either rotated daily (for the purpose of severing the mycelium) or nontreated (Intact) for 10 days, during which W+OS treatment was introduced (A). Plants were then harvested to measure the root colonization rate (B), shoot 15N (C), root 15N (D), and ZmAMT3;1 (a mycorrhizal inducible nitrogen transporter gene) expression (E). The 15N in Intact-’W+OS’ minus the 15N in Rotated-’W+OS’ (to counteract the effect of root acquisition of 15N) was present as a ‘Control’, and 15N in Intact+’W+OS’ minus the 15N in Rotated+’W+OS’ (to counteract the effect of herbivory on root acquisition of 15N) was present as ‘W+OS’ in (C) and (D). NM, non-mycorrhizal roots; AM, arbuscular mycorrhizal roots. For the analysis of root colonization, n = 6; 15N accumulation, n = 4; ZmAMT3;1 expression, n = 3. Data are the means ± SE of biological replicates. Asterisks indicate significant differences (Student’s t-test, *P < 0.05; ns, no significance).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Common mycorrhizal network-mediated N transfer between maize plants was affected by herbivory. Maize plants were inoculated with Rir and cultivated in self-designed mesocosms as demonstrated in experiment IV (A), RC, root compartment; CMNs, common mycorrhizal networks; ERM, extraradical mycorrhizal mycelia. The CMNs established between the two maize plants were either damaged daily or intact. Five weeks after Rir inoculation the mycorrhizal colonization rate in the roots was measured (B, E). Thereafter, 10 days after 15N labeling and W+OS treatment, 15N was detected in unlabeled plants (C, D) and 15N-labeled plants (F, G). Data are the means ± SE of the three (or six) biological replicates. Asterisks indicate significant differences (Student’s t-test, *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001; ns, no significance).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Diagram of pathways for N uptake in maize plants. (A) Pathway for maize plant N uptake under no stress. (B) Diagram of the pathway for maize plant N uptake under herbivory. Myc-N, N uptake by mycorrhizal pathway from soil; root-N, N uptake by root from soil; transfer-N, N obtained from the CMN-connected neighboring plant; formula image, N transferred from a CMN-connected neighboring plant was blocked.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Mycorrhizae in mine wasteland reclamation.
    Owiny AA, Dusengemungu L. Owiny AA, et al. Heliyon. 2024 Jun 17;10(13):e33141. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33141. eCollection 2024 Jul 15. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 39035525 Free PMC article. Review.

References

    1. Alaux P.-L., Naveau F., Declerck S., Cranenbrouck S. (2020). Common mycorrhizal network induced JA/ET genes expression in healthy potato plants connected to potato plants infected by phytophthora infestans. Front. Plant Sci. 11. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00602 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Almario J., Fabiańska I., Saridis G., Bucher M. (2022). Unearthing the plant–microbe quid pro quo in root associations with beneficial fungi. New Phytol. 234 (6), 1967–1976. doi: 10.1111/nph.18061 - DOI - PubMed
    1. An J., Zeng T., Ji C., de Graaf S., Zheng Z., Xiao T. T., et al. . (2019). A medicago truncatula SWEET transporter implicated in arbuscule maintenance during arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. New Phytol. 224 (1), 396–408. doi: 10.1111/nph.15975 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Babikova Z., Gilbert L., Bruce T. J., Birkett M., Caulfield J. C., Woodcock C., et al. . (2013). Underground signals carried through common mycelial networks warn neighbouring plants of aphid attack. Ecol. Lett. 16 (7), 835–843. doi: 10.1111/ele.12115 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Babikova Z., Johnson D., Bruce T., Pickett J., Gilbert L. (2013). How rapid is aphid-induced signal transfer between plants via common mycelial networks? Commun. Integr. Biol. 6 (6), 835–843. doi: 10.4161/cib.25904 - DOI - PMC - PubMed