Exercise volume load in women with breast cancer: Study protocol for the ABRACE randomized clinical trial
- PMID: 36589863
- PMCID: PMC9798137
- DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.101053
Exercise volume load in women with breast cancer: Study protocol for the ABRACE randomized clinical trial
Abstract
Background: An increased number of breast cancer patients are challenged by acute and persistent treatment side effects. Oncology guidelines have been establishing physical exercise to counteract several treatment-related toxicities throughout cancer care. However, evidence regarding the optimal dose-response, feasibility, and the minimal resistance exercise volume and/or intensity remains unclear. The ABRACE Study will assess the impact of different resistance training volumes (i.e., single or multiple sets) combined with aerobic exercise on physical and psychological outcomes of breast cancer patients undergoing primary treatment.
Methods: This study is a randomized, controlled, three-armed parallel trial. A total of 84 participants, aged ≥18 years, with breast cancer stages I-III, initiating adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (≤50% of sessions completed) will be randomized to multiple sets resistance training plus aerobic training group, single set resistance training plus aerobic training group or control group. Neuromuscular and cancer-related fatigue (primary outcomes), muscle strength, muscle thickness, muscle quality by echo intensity, body composition, cardiorespiratory capacity, functional performance, upper-body endurance and quality of life will be measured before and after the 12-week intervention. Our analysis will follow the intention-to-treat approach and per-protocol criteria, with additional sub-group analysis.
Discussion: Findings support prescribing exercise during chemotherapy for breast cancer and elucidate the potential role of different resistance training volumes as a management strategy for physical and psychological impairments in women with early-stage breast cancer. Our main hypothesis is for superiority in physical and psychological outcomes for both training groups compared to the control group, with no difference between single or multiple sets groups.
Trial registration: Clinical trials NCT03314168.
Keywords: 1-RM, one-repetition maximum; 3-RM, three-repetition maximum; ABRACE, Adaptations to Breast Cancer and Exercise; Breast neoplasms; CG, control group; Combined training; DXA, Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; EI, echo intensity; ES, effect size; Fatigue; ITT, intent-to-treat analysis; MQ, muscle quality; MT, muscle thickness; PP, per-protocol analysis; Physical exercise; QF, quadriceps; QoL, quality of life; RF, rectus femoris; SM + AT, multiple sets resistance training plus aerobic training; SS + AT, single set resistance training plus aerobic training; Strength training; VL, vastus lateralis; VM, vastus medialis; VT, vastus intermedius.
© 2022 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
-
- Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L., Laversanne M., Soerjomataram I., Jemal A., Bray F. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries, CA. Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71:209–249. - PubMed
-
- Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Jemal A. Cancer statistics. CA. Cancer J. Clin. 2019;69:7–34. 2019. - PubMed
-
- Schmitz K.H., Cappola A.R., Stricker C.T., Sweeney C., Norman S.A. The intersection of cancer and aging: establishing the need for breast cancer rehabilitation. Cancer Epidemiol. Prev. Biomarkers. 2007;16:866–872. - PubMed
-
- Berger A.M., Gerber L.H., Mayer D.K. Cancer-related fatigue: implications for breast cancer survivors. Cancer. 2012;118:2261–2269. - PubMed
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
