Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 1:12:51-70.
doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2022.07.011. eCollection 2022 Dec.

PROSE: Prospective Randomized Trial of the On-X Mechanical Prosthesis and the St Jude Medical Mechanical Prosthesis Evaluation: Part 2: Study results-prostheses, positions, and economic development

Affiliations

PROSE: Prospective Randomized Trial of the On-X Mechanical Prosthesis and the St Jude Medical Mechanical Prosthesis Evaluation: Part 2: Study results-prostheses, positions, and economic development

W R Eric Jamieson et al. JTCVS Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: The Prospective Randomized On-X Mechanical Prosthesis Versus St Jude Medical Mechanical Prosthesis Evaluation (PROSE) trial purpose was to investigate whether a current-generation mechanical prosthesis (On-X; On-X Life Technologies/Artivion Inc) reduced the incidence of thromboembolic-related complications compared with a previous-generation mechanical prosthesis (St Jude Medical Mechanical Prosthesis; Abbott/St Jude Medical). This second report documents the valve-related complications by individual prostheses and by Western and Developing populations.

Methods: The PROSE trial study was conducted in 28 worldwide centers and incorporated 855 subjects randomized between 2003 and 2016. The study enrollment was discontinued on August 31, 2016. The study protocol, and analyses of 10 demographic variables and 24 risk factors were published in detail in 2021.

Results: The total patient population (N = 855) included patients receiving an On-X valve (n = 462) and a St Jude Medical valve (n = 393). The overall freedom evaluation showed no differences at 5 years between the prostheses for thromboembolism or for valve thrombosis. There were also no differences in mortality. There were several differences between Developing and Western populations. The freedom relations at 5 years for mortality favored Western over Developing populations. Valve thrombosis was differentiated by position and site: aortic < mitral (P = .007) and Western < Developing (P = .005). In the mitral position there were no cases in Western populations, whereas there were 8 in Developing populations (P = .217).

Conclusions: The On-X valve and St Jude Medical valve performed equally well in the study with no differences found. The only differentiation occurred with valve thrombosis in the mitral position more than the aortic position and occurring in Developing more than Western populations. The occurrence of valve thrombosis was also related to a younger population possibly due to anticoagulation compliance based on record review.

Keywords: BMI, body mass index; CHF, congestive heart failure; INR, international normalized ratio; NYHA, New York Heart Association; PROSE, Prospective Randomized On-X Mechanical Prosthesis Versus St Jude Medical Mechanical Prosthesis Evaluation; TE, thromboembolism; VT, valve thrombosis; economic development; position; prosthesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
On-X Prosthetic Heart Valve (On-X Life Technologies/Artivion Inc).
Figure 1
Figure 1
On-X Prosthetic Heart Valve (On-X Life Technologies/Artivion Inc).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Freedom from thromboembolism by valve type with 95% CIs. Five-year event-free rate in percent ± SE and log rank P value. On-X Prosthetic Heart Valve (On-X Life Technologies [On-X]/Artivion Inc); St Jude Medical Mechanical Prosthesis (Abbott/St Jude Medical [SJM]). CI, Confidence Interval; SE, standard error.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Freedom from Valve Thrombosis by Valve Type with 95% CIs. Five-year event-free rate in percent ± SE, and log rank P value. On-X Prosthetic Heart Valve (On-X Life Technologies [On-X]/Artivion Inc); St Jude Medical Mechanical Prosthesis (Abbott/St Jude Medical [SJM]). CI, Confidence interval; SE, standard error.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Freedom from valve thrombosis by valve position with 95% CIs. Five-year event-free rate in percent ± SE, and log rank P value. CI, Confidence interval; SE, standard error.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Freedom from thromboembolism by site with 95% CIs. Five-year event-free rate in percent ± SE, and log rank P-value. CI, Confidence interval; SE, standard error.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Freedom from valve thrombosis by site with 95% CI. Five-year event-free rate in percent ± SE, and log rank P value. CI, Confidence interval; SE, standard error.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Thromboembolism (TE) and valve thrombosis (VT) event rates by study cohort: Summary figure for TE and VT linearized rates in percent per patient-year for all cohorts analyzed with indicators for statistically significant differences at P < .05. Bold double-ended arrows indicate significant differences in VT. SJM, St Jude Medical; On-X, On-X Life Technologies.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Prostheses used: A, On-X aortic valve (On-X Life Technologies/Artivion Inc). B, St Jude Medical aortic valve (Abbott/St Jude Medical). C, On-X mitral valve. D, St Jude Medical mitral valve.
Figure E1
Figure E1
Consolidated standards of reporting trials flow diagram for randomized groups in the Prospective Randomized On-X Prosthesis Versus St Jude Medical Mechanical Prosthesis Evaluation trial.
Figure E2
Figure E2
Thromboembolism (TE) and valve thrombosis (VT) rates for mitral patients by cohort. Summary figure for TE and VT linearized rates among mitral valve patients in percent per patient-year for all cohorts analyzed with indicators for statistically significant differences at P < .05. On-X, On-X Life Technologies; SJM, St Jude Medical.
Figure E3
Figure E3
Thromboembolism (TE) and valve thrombosis (VT) rates for aortic patients by cohort. Summary figure for TE and VT linearized rates among aortic valve patients in percent per patient-year for all cohorts analyzed with indicators for statistically significant differences at P < .05. On-X, On-X Life Technologies; SJM, St Jude Medical.
None

References

    1. Jamieson W.R.E., Ely J.L., Brink J., Pennel T., Bannon P., Patel J., et al. PROSE: Prospective Randomized Trial of the On-X Mechanical Prosthesis and the St Jude Medical Mechanical Prosthesis Evaluation: part 1(patient dynamics): preoperative demographics and preoperative and operative risk factors. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021;16:323–334. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Akins C.W., Miller D.C., Turina M.I., Kouchoukos N.T., Blackstone E.H., Grunkemeier G.L., et al. Guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after cardiac valve interventions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135:732–738. - PubMed
    1. US Food and Drug Administration On-X valve summary of safety and effectiveness. PMA P000037, May 30, 2001, and PMA P000037 S002. March 6, 2002. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf/P000037S001b.pdf
    1. Palatianos G.M., Laczkovics A.M., Simon P., Pomar J.L., Birnbaum D.E., Greve H.H., et al. Multicentered European study on safety and effectiveness on the On-X prosthetic heart valve: intermediate follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:40–46. - PubMed
    1. McNicholas K.W., Ivey T.D., Metras J., Szentpetery S., Marra S.W., Masters R.G., et al. North American multicenter experience with the On-X prosthetic heart valve. J Heart Valve Dis. 2006;15:73–79. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources