Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Dec 16:9:1070385.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1070385. eCollection 2022.

Progress in kidney transplantation: The role for systems immunology

Affiliations
Review

Progress in kidney transplantation: The role for systems immunology

Aileen C Johnson et al. Front Med (Lausanne). .

Abstract

The development of systems biology represents an immense breakthrough in our ability to perform translational research and deliver personalized and precision medicine. A multidisciplinary approach in combination with use of novel techniques allows for the extraction and analysis of vast quantities of data even from the volume and source limited samples that can be obtained from human subjects. Continued advances in microfluidics, scalability and affordability of sequencing technologies, and development of data analysis tools have made the application of a multi-omics, or systems, approach more accessible for use outside of specialized centers. The study of alloimmune and protective immune responses after solid organ transplant offers innumerable opportunities for a multi-omics approach, however, transplant immunology labs are only just beginning to adopt the systems methodology. In this review, we focus on advances in biological techniques and how they are improving our understanding of the immune system and its interactions, highlighting potential applications in transplant immunology. First, we describe the techniques that are available, with emphasis on major advances that allow for increased scalability. Then, we review initial applications in the field of transplantation with a focus on topics that are nearing clinical integration. Finally, we examine major barriers to adapting these methods and discuss potential future developments.

Keywords: eplet; graft failure; immunopeptidome; kidney transplantation; multi-omics; rejection; systems biology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Complex factors play a role in kidney transplant recipient outcomes. Baseline factors at the time of transplantation for both donor and recipient determine the immune micro-environment in the transplant recipient. Modulating factors such as immunosuppression and antiviral prophylaxis moderate the recipient response to this disturbance. The interplay between the fixed baseline characteristics of donor and recipient and modifiable features (immunosuppression) determines the outcome for each transplant recipient.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Application of systems immunology to transplantation. In kidney transplantation, samples can be obtained from 3 primary sources: whole blood, urine, and allograft tissue. High dimensional measurement of each sample type provides a unique source of information, which can be integrated using bioinformatics to build a more complete understanding of the biologic system.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Machine learning–fundamental concepts. In supervised methods, input data is already classified, and machine learning is used to determine associations. In unsupervised methods, input features are used to determine classification.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Dimensionality reduction (144). An example of dimensionality reduction use to display the results of unsupervised clustering. Heatmaps (C) display the representation of input features in each cluster. While TSNE graphs allow visualization of the distribution of clusters or cell types (A), input feature (B), and detection of differences in cluster frequency between sample types (D).
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
T-cell receptor (TCR) similarity analysis (217). TCRs can be grouped in terms of sequence similarity (A). Connected components can be identified by network analysis (B). Known specificities can be overlaid on similarity networks (C), and motifs inferred (D).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Poggio ED, Augustine JJ, Arrigain S, Brennan DC, Schold JD. Long-term kidney transplant graft survival-Making progress when most needed. Am J Transplant. (2021) 21:2824–32. 10.1111/ajt.16463 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Langewisch E, Mannon RB. Chronic Allograft Injury. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol CJASN. (2021) 16:1723–9. 10.2215/CJN.15590920 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gaston RS, Fieberg A, Hunsicker L, Kasiske BL, Leduc R, Cosio FG, et al. Late graft failure after kidney transplantation as the consequence of late versus early events. Am J Transplant. (2018) 18:1158–67. 10.1111/ajt.14590 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van Loon E, Bernards J, Van Craenenbroeck AH, Naesens M. The causes of kidney allograft failure: More than alloimmunity. a viewpoint article. Transplantation. (2020) 104:e46–56. 10.1097/TP.0000000000003012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Taber DJ, Weimert NA, Henderson F, Lin A, Bratton CF, Chavin KD, et al. Long-term efficacy of induction therapy with anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies or thymoglobulin compared with no induction therapy in renal transplantation. Transplant Proc. (2008) 40:3401–7. 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.08.130 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources