Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Dec 15:9:937825.
doi: 10.3389/frobt.2022.937825. eCollection 2022.

Socio-conversational systems: Three challenges at the crossroads of fields

Affiliations
Review

Socio-conversational systems: Three challenges at the crossroads of fields

Chloé Clavel et al. Front Robot AI. .

Abstract

Socio-conversational systems are dialogue systems, including what are sometimes referred to as chatbots, vocal assistants, social robots, and embodied conversational agents, that are capable of interacting with humans in a way that treats both the specifically social nature of the interaction and the content of a task. The aim of this paper is twofold: 1) to uncover some places where the compartmentalized nature of research conducted around socio-conversational systems creates problems for the field as a whole, and 2) to propose a way to overcome this compartmentalization and thus strengthen the capabilities of socio-conversational systems by defining common challenges. Specifically, we examine research carried out by the signal processing, natural language processing and dialogue, machine/deep learning, social/affective computing and social sciences communities. We focus on three major challenges for the development of effective socio-conversational systems, and describe ways to tackle them.

Keywords: Affective computing; Machine learning; Multimodality; Natural language processing; Social signal processing; Socio-conversational systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
The three challenges for gathering different research in conversational AI.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Two types of task-oriented systems architectures: modular (top) or end-to-end (below).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Machine learning approaches in socio-conversational systems. Orange boxes represent the different types of supervision of machine learning models, white boxes the different usages, green boxes the intervention of external knowledge, and blue and purple arrows represent the modular and end-to-end settings, respectively. Dotted arrows indicate when the information comes from labels derived from human knowledge.

References

    1. Baker A. L., Phillips E. K., Ullman D., Keebler J. R. (2018). Toward an understanding of trust repair in human-robot interaction: Current research and future directions. ACM Trans. Interact. Intelligent Syst. (TiiS) 8, 1–30.
    1. Baltrušaitis T., Robinson P., Morency L.-P. (2016). “Openface: An open source facial behavior analysis toolkit,” in 2016 IEEE winter conference on applications of computer vision (WACV) (IEEE; ), 1–10.
    1. Benotti L., Blackburn P. (2021). Grounding as a collaborative process. In Proceedings of the 16th conference of the European chapter of the association for computational linguistics: Main volume. Association for Computational Linguistics, 515–531. 10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.41 - DOI
    1. Bickmore T., Schulman D., Yin L. (2010). Maintaining engagement in long-term interventions with relational agents. Appl. Artif. Intell. 24, 648–666. 10.1080/08839514.2010.492259 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bickmore T. W., Vardoulakis L. M. P., Schulman D. (2013). Tinker: A relational agent museum guide. Auton. Agent. Multi. Agent. Syst. 27, 254–276. 10.1007/s10458-012-9216-7 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources