Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul;41(7):993-1003.
doi: 10.1038/s41587-022-01587-6. Epub 2023 Jan 2.

Transcriptome-wide profiling and quantification of N6-methyladenosine by enzyme-assisted adenosine deamination

Affiliations

Transcriptome-wide profiling and quantification of N6-methyladenosine by enzyme-assisted adenosine deamination

Yu-Lan Xiao et al. Nat Biotechnol. 2023 Jul.

Abstract

N6-methyladenosine (m6A), the most abundant internal messenger RNA modification in higher eukaryotes, serves myriad roles in regulating cellular processes. Functional dissection of m6A is, however, hampered in part by the lack of high-resolution and quantitative detection methods. Here we present evolved TadA-assisted N6-methyladenosine sequencing (eTAM-seq), an enzyme-assisted sequencing technology that detects and quantifies m6A by global adenosine deamination. With eTAM-seq, we analyze the transcriptome-wide distribution of m6A in HeLa and mouse embryonic stem cells. The enzymatic deamination route employed by eTAM-seq preserves RNA integrity, facilitating m6A detection from limited input samples. In addition to transcriptome-wide m6A profiling, we demonstrate site-specific, deep-sequencing-free m6A quantification with as few as ten cells, an input demand orders of magnitude lower than existing quantitative profiling methods. We envision that eTAM-seq will enable researchers to not only survey the m6A landscape at unprecedented resolution, but also detect m6A at user-specified loci with a simple workflow.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1 |
Figure 1 |. Global A deamination by TadA8.20.
a. Proposed m6A detection scheme. TadA8.20 selectively converts A into I, without acting on m6A. I is recognized as G by reverse transcriptases. Persistent A post-TadA8.20 treatment corresponds to m6A. b, c. In vitro deamination of RNA probes hosting A or m6A in “CGAUC” (b) and “GGACU” (c) motifs by TadA8.20. Unmethylated and methylated RNA sequences were prepared through in vitro transcription using ATP and N6-methyl-ATP as starting materials, respectively. Treated RNA was reverse transcribed, amplified, and subjected to Sanger sequencing. d, e. TadA8.20-catalyzed A-to-I conversion rates in “CGAUC” (d) and “GGACU” (e) probes quantified by next-generation sequencing. f. Deamination of synthetic A/m6A RNA probes by TadA8.20. 53-nt RNA probes hosting NNANN and NNm6ANN motifs were treated by TadA-8.20. Deaminated RNA underwent RT and next-generation sequencing. g. Correlation of persistent A signals captured by eTAM-seq and m6A contents in RNA probes. h. Capillary gel electrophoresis analysis of fragmented HeLa mRNA treated with or without TadA8.20 at different temperatures for 3 h. RNA size distribution is plotted on the right. For eTAM-seq, RNA is incubated with TadA8.20 at 53°C for 1 h followed by 2 h treatment at 44°C. Experiments were repeated independently with similar results. i. Transcriptome-wide A-to-I conversion rates in two independent replicates. 10% of A sites with ≥100 counts were randomly sampled to make the scatter plot. Pearson’s r was calculated for all A sites with ≥100 counts. j. Two m6A sites in human rRNA. Positions 1829–1835 of 18S rRNA and positions 4217–4223 of 28S rRNA are plotted.
Figure 2 |
Figure 2 |. Transcriptome-wide m6A profiling in HeLa mRNA by eTAM-seq.
a. Overlap analysis of m6A sites identified in three biological replicates of eTAM-seq (HeLa/IVT). b. Methylation levels of common sites detected in eTAM-seq (HeLa/IVT-1) and eTAM-seq (HeLa/IVT-2). Correlative analyses on methylation levels reported by replicate 1 vs 3 and 2 vs 3 are provided in Supplementary Fig. 7. c. Hit distributions in DRACH and non-DRACH sequences at different methylation levels. d. Cumulative m6A signals from highly methylated sites to lowly methylated sites (right to left). m6A constitutes 0.41% of all A subject to evaluation in the HeLa transcriptome. e. Overlap analysis of m6A sites identified by eTAM-seq and peak clusters generated via MeRIP-seq. The overlap between eTAM-seq and MeRIP-seq increases with higher read depth and methylation levels. f. Metagene plot of transcriptome-wide distribution of m6A. m6A distributions across different RNA regions are provided in the inserted pie chart. IGR: intergenic region; ncRNA: non-coding RNA. g. Major sequence motifs hosting m6A. DRACH motifs are in black and non-DRACH motifs are colored in red. The consensus sequence hosting m6A is inserted. h. m6A sites co-discovered by eTAM-seq and m6A-SAC-seq. Hits in DGACU captured by both methods are subject to overlap analysis. m6A-SAC-seq dataset: GSE198246. i. m6A positions and fractions in MALAT1, TPT1, MYC, and ZBED5. eTAM-seq signals are plotted as methylation levels (%) alongside MeRIP-seq peaks in normalized read coverage. Note that eTAM-seq (HeLa/IVT) has slightly higher coverage than eTAM-seq (HeLa/FTO) and may therefore capture more m6A sites. MALAT1_2515, 2577, 2611 and TPT1_687, 703 are indicated by arrows. The coding sequence for TPT1 is on the minus strand of the genome.
Figure 3 |
Figure 3 |. m6A profiling in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) by eTAM-seq.
a. Hit distributions in DRACH and non-DRACH sequences across different methylation levels. m6A sites identified by eTAM-seq (mESC/IVT) are plotted. b. Metagene plot of transcriptome-wide distribution of m6A. m6A distributions across different RNA regions are inserted. IGR: intergenic region; ncRNA: non-coding RNA. c. Overlap analysis of m6A sites identified by eTAM-seq and peak clusters generated via MeRIP-seq. Hits detected by eTAM-seq (mESC/IVT) are overlapped with a published MeRIP-seq dataset (left). One MeRIP-seq peak covers multiple m6A sites (right). Similar analyses using the eTAM-seq (mESC/FTO) dataset are provided in Supplementary Fig. 18. d. Methylation levels reported by eTAM-seq (mESC/IVT) and eTAM-seq (mESC/FTO). e. m6A positions and fractions in selected regions of Nanog, Sox2, and Klf4. eTAM-seq hits are plotted in methylation levels (%) and are juxtaposed with MeRIP-seq peaks in normalized read coverage. For a zoomed-out view of m6A distribution in full-length Nanog, Sox2, and Klf4, see Supplementary Fig. 19.
Figure 4 |
Figure 4 |. m6A is strongly depleted in Mettl3 KO mESCs.
a. Venn diagram showing the overlap of eTAM-seq-detected m6A sites in ctrl and Mettl3 KO mESCs. b. Hit distributions in DRACH and non-DRACH sequences. c. Methylation levels of eTAM-seq-captured m6A sites in ctrl and Mettl3 KO mESCs. Lower and upper hinges in the box plot represent first and third quartiles with the center line and red dot representing the median and the mean, respectively. Whiskers cover ±1.5× of the interquartile range. d. Scatter plot of methylation levels for m6A sites jointly identified in ctrl and Mettl3 KO mESCs. e. Changes of methylation levels in ctrl and Mettl3 KO mESCs. Methylation difference for a given A site = methylation level in ctrl mESCs – methylation level in Mettl3 KO mESCs.
Figure 5 |
Figure 5 |. m6A impacts transcript stability.
Cumulative distributions for transcripts of different half-lives in HeLa cells treated with control and METTL3-targeting siRNA. Transcripts methylated to different levels are analyzed in separate bins (high m6A: n = 1,593; medium m6A: n = 1,594; low m6A: n = 1,593; no m6A: n = 1,758). Box violin plots of transcript half-lives are inserted. Lower and upper hinges represent first and third quartiles. The center line and the red dot denote the median and the mean, with whiskers covering ± 1.5× of the interquartile range. P-values were determined by one-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test using the unmethylated group as a reference. HeLa mRNA half-life dataset: GSE49339.
Figure 6 |
Figure 6 |. Site-specific, deep sequencing-free m6A detection and quantification.
a. Workflow for eTAM-seq-enabled site-specific quantification of m6A. mRNA is fragmented, ligated to a DNA adapter, treated by TadA8.20, and reverse transcribed into cDNA. Site-specific primers are designed to recognize post-deamination RNA sequences and amplify the loci of interest. m6A quantification can be achieved by both Sanger sequencing and amplicon deep sequencing. b. Quantification of methylation levels for 8 m6A sites in HeLa mRNA by Sanger sequencing, amplicon deep sequencing, and RNA-seq. Tad8.20-treated IVT samples are provided for reference only. c. Methylation quantification for ACTB_1427 and EIF2A_994 with 5 ng, 500 pg, 50 pg, and 5 pg mRNA. d. Methylation quantification for ACTB_1427 and EIF2A_994 with 25 ng, 2.5 ng, and 250 pg total RNA.

References

    1. Frye M, Jaffrey SR, Pan T, Rechavi G & Suzuki T RNA modifications: what have we learned and where are we headed? Nat. Rev. Genet. 17, 365–372 (2016). - PubMed
    1. Peer E, Rechavi G & Dominissini D Epitranscriptomics: regulation of mRNA metabolism through modifications. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 41, 93–98 (2017). - PubMed
    1. Nachtergaele S & He C Chemical modifications in the life of an mRNA transcript. Annu. Rev. Genet. 52, 349–372 (2018). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jiang X et al. The role of m6A modification in the biological functions and diseases. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 6, 74 (2021). - PMC - PubMed
    1. He PC & He C m(6) A RNA methylation: from mechanisms to therapeutic potential. EMBO J. 40, e105977 (2021). - PMC - PubMed

References for Methods

    1. Liu J et al. N (6)-methyladenosine of chromosome-associated regulatory RNA regulates chromatin state and transcription. Science 367, 580–586 (2020). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hagemann-Jensen M et al. Single-cell RNA counting at allele and isoform resolution using Smart-seq3. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 708–714 (2020). - PubMed
    1. Martin M Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet.journal 17, 3 (2011).
    1. Smith T, Heger A & Sudbery I UMI-tools: modeling sequencing errors in Unique Molecular Identifiers to improve quantification accuracy. Genome Res. 27, 491–499 (2017). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhang Y, Park C, Bennett C, Thornton M & Kim D Rapid and accurate alignment of nucleotide conversion sequencing reads with HISAT-3N. Genome Res. (2021). - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources