Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022;41(2):74-95.
doi: 10.1080/14636778.2022.2063827. Epub 2022 May 13.

"Idealists and capitalists": ownership attitudes and preferences in genomic citizen science

Christi J Guerrini  1 , Jorge L Contreras  2 , Whitney Bash Brooks  1 , Isabel Canfield  1 , Meredith Trejo  1 , Amy L McGuire  1
Affiliations

"Idealists and capitalists": ownership attitudes and preferences in genomic citizen science

Christi J Guerrini et al. New Genet Soc. 2022.

Abstract

The perspectives of genomic citizen scientists on ownership of research outputs are not well understood, yet they are useful for identifying alignment of participant expectations and project practices and can help guide efforts to develop innovative tools and strategies for managing ownership claims. Here, we report findings from 52 interviews conducted in 2018 and 2019 to understand genomic citizen science stakeholders' conceptualizations of, experiences with, and preferences for ownership of research outputs. Interviewees identified four approaches for recognizing genomic citizen scientists' ownership and related credit interests in research outputs: shared governance via commons models; fractional ownership of benefits; full and creative attribution; and offensive and defensive patenting. Interviewees also agreed that the model selected by any project should at least maximize access to research outputs and, as appropriate and to the extent possible, broadly distribute rights of control and entitlements to research benefits.

Keywords: Citizen science; commons; intellectual property; participatory research; patent.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure of interests CG is a paid consultant to National Science Foundation Award Number 2032598 and received an honorarium for presenting at Bioethics, Citizen Science, and Human Subject Protection: Waiting for the World to Change. AM is a paid member of the SAB for Geisinger Research and Morgridge Institute for Research and is a paid member of the Board for the Greenwall Foundation.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Ownership and credit models for citizen science outputs.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. 35 U. S. Code § 101 et seq.
    1. Ahmed, E., and Shabani M.. 2019. “DNA Data Marketplace: An Analysis of the Ethical Concerns Regarding the Participation of the Individuals.” Frontiers in Genetics 10: 1107. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Asay, C. D. 2013. “A Case for the Public Domain.” Ohio State Law Journal 74: 753–806.
    1. Aungst, H., Fishman J. R., and McGowan M. L.. 2017. “Participatory Genomic Research: Ethical Issues from the Bottom Up to the Top Down.” Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 18: 357–367. - PubMed
    1. Benkler, Y. 2006. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

LinkOut - more resources