Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr;123(4):911-921.
doi: 10.1007/s00421-022-05121-z. Epub 2023 Jan 3.

Force-velocity profile in sprinting: sex effect

Affiliations
Free article

Force-velocity profile in sprinting: sex effect

Paul Galantine et al. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2023 Apr.
Free article

Abstract

The ability to produce muscle power during sprint acceleration is a major determinant of physical performance. The comparison of the force-velocity (F-v: theoretical maximal force, F0; velocity, v0 and maximal power output, Pmax) profile between men and women has attracted little attention. Most studies of sex differences have failed to apply a scaling ratio when reporting data. The present study investigated the sex effect on the F-v profile using an allometric model applied with body mass (BM), fat-free mass (FFM), fat-free mass of the lower limb (FFMLL), cross-sectional area (CSA) and leg length (LL) to mechanical parameters. Thirty students (15 men, 15 women) participated. Raw velocity-time data for three maximal 35 m sprints were measured with a radar. Mechanical parameters of the F-v relationship were calculated from the modelling of the velocity-time curve. When F0 and Pmax were allometrically scaled with BM (p = 0.538; ES = 0.23) and FFM (p = 0.176; ES = 0.51), there were no significant differences between men and women. However, when the allometric model was applied to Pmax with FFMLL (p = 0.015; ES = 0.52), F0 with CSA (p = 0.016; ES = 0.93) and v0 with LL (p ≤ 0.001; ES = 1.98) differences between men and women persisted. FFM explained 83% of the sex differences in the F-v profile (p ≤ 0.001). After applying an allometric model, sex differences in the F-v profile are explained by other factors than body dimensions (i.e., physiological qualitative differences).

Keywords: Allometric model; Force; Sex; Sprint; Velocity.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Åstrand P-O, Rodahl K (1986) Textbook of work physiology: physiological bases of exercise. McGraw Hill
    1. Beaulieu ML, Lamontagne M, Xu L (2008) Gender differences in time-frequency EMG analysis of unanticipated cutting maneuvers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 40:1795–1804. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817b8e9e - DOI - PubMed
    1. Behan FP, Moody R, Patel TS et al (2019) Biceps femoris long head muscle fascicle length does not differ between sexes. J Sports Sci 37:2452–2458. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2019.1641016 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bencke J, Zebis MK (2011) The influence of gender on neuromuscular pre-activity during side-cutting. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 21:371–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2010.10.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Besson T, Macchi R, Rossi J et al (2022) Sex differences in endurance running. Sports Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-022-01651-w - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources