Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep;23(6):1513-1521.
doi: 10.1037/emo0001203. Epub 2023 Jan 2.

Affective language spreads between anxious children and their mothers during a challenging puzzle task

Affiliations

Affective language spreads between anxious children and their mothers during a challenging puzzle task

Erik C Nook et al. Emotion. 2023 Sep.

Abstract

Humans influence each other's emotions. The spread of emotion is well documented across behavioral, psychophysiological, and neuroscientific levels of analysis, but might this influence also be evident in language (e.g., are people more likely to use emotion words after hearing someone else use them)? The current study tests whether mothers and children influence each other's use of affective language. From 2018 to 2020, children aged 6-12 who met diagnostic criteria for anxiety disorders and their mothers (N = 93 dyads) completed a challenging puzzle task while being video recorded. Analyses of transcriptions revealed that mothers and children indeed influenced each other's language. Bidirectional influence was observed for use of negative affect words: Mothers were more likely to use negative affect words if their child had just used negative affect words (over and above mothers' own language on their previous turn), and children were similarly influenced by mother affect word use. A similar bidirectional relation emerged for linguistic distance, a measure related to effective emotion regulation and mental health. However, the significance of the child-to-mother direction of influence for these two variables varied depending on correction threshold and should thus be verified in future research. Nonetheless, these findings extend understanding of emotional influence by showing turn-by-turn relations between the use of affective language. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Abend R, de Voogd L, Salemink E, Wiers RW, Pérez-Edgar K, Fitzgerald A, White LK, Salum GA, He J, Silverman WK, Pettit JW, Pine DS, & Bar-Haim Y (2018). Association between attention bias to threat and anxiety symptoms in children and adolescents. Depression and Anxiety, 35(3), 229–238. 10.1002/da.22706 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, & Walker S (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 - DOI
    1. Bauer PJ, Stark EN, Lukowski AF, Redamacher J, Van Abbema DL, & Ackil JK (2005). Working together to make sense of the past: Mothers’ and children’s use of internal states language in conversations about traumatic and nontraumatic events. Journal of Cognition and Development, 6(4), 463–488. 10.1207/s15327647jcd0604_2 - DOI
    1. Baumeister RF, Bratslavsky E, Finkenauer C, & Vohs KD (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370. 10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323 - DOI
    1. Benjamini Y, & Hochberg Y (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 57(1), 289–300. 10.2307/2346101 - DOI