Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Dec 30;101(52):e32207.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032207.

Efficacy and safety of endostar combined with cisplatin in treatment of non-small cell lung cancer with malignant pleural effusion: A meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Efficacy and safety of endostar combined with cisplatin in treatment of non-small cell lung cancer with malignant pleural effusion: A meta-analysis

Yongqi Hu et al. Medicine (Baltimore). .

Abstract

Background: Although there are new treatments for non-small cell lung cancer with malignant pleural effusion, these therapies are prone to recurrent pleural effusion and poor in efficacy. And recombinant human endostatin is a new type of anti-tumor angiogenesis drug independently developed in my country. It has the effect of inhibiting tumor angiogenesis, inhibiting tumor proliferation and differentiation, and effectively inhibiting the formation and recurrence of malignant pleural effusion. Therefore, this study is aim to systematically review the efficacy and safety of intrapleural injection of endostar combined with cisplatin in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with malignant pleural effusion.

Methods: Databases including Cochrane Library, PubMed, CBM, Embase, CNKI, and WanFang Data were searched to collect randomized controlled trials about endostar combined with cisplatin for NSCLC with malignant pleural effusion from inception to April 2022. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias in included studies. Finally, the meta-analysis was made by using RevMan 5.4.1 software.

Results: A total of 11 randomized controlled trials involving 814 patients were finally included. The results of the meta-analysis showed that: The overall response rate and the improvement rate of quality of life in the endostar combined with cisplatin group were higher than that of the cisplatin alone group (relative risk = 1.58, 95% confidence interval = 1.42-1.76, P < .00001; relative risk = 1.63, 95% confidence interval = 1.38-1.93, P < .00001, respectively). Meanwhile, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the incidence of gastrointestinal reaction, the incidence of leucopenia, the incidence of thrombocytopenia, and the incidence of hypodynamia (all P values > .05).

Conclusion: Compared with cisplatin, intrapleural injection of endostar combined with cisplatin could improve the overall response rate and the quality of life of NSCLC patients with malignant pleural effusion. Due to the limited quality and quantity of included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA flow chart of selection process to identify studies eligible for pooling.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Risk of bias of the included studies—risk of bias graph (A) and summary (B).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Forest plot of meta-analysis of the overall response rate. CI = confidence interval, M-H = mantel-haenszel.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Forest plot of meta-analysis of quality of life improvement rate. CI = confidence interval, M-H = mantel-haenszel.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Forest plot of meta-analysis of the incidence of gastrointestinal reactions. CI = confidence interval, M-H = mantel-haenszel.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Forest plot of meta-analysis of the incidence of leukopenia. CI = confidence interval, M-H = mantel-haenszel.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Forest plot of meta-analysis of the incidence of thrombocytopenia. CI = confidence interval, M-H = mantel-haenszel.
Figure 8.
Figure 8.
Forest plot of meta-analysis of the incidence of hypodynamia. CI = confidence interval, M-H = mantel-haenszel.
Figure 9.
Figure 9.
The funnel plot of overall response rate. RR = relative risk, SE = standard error.
Figure 10.
Figure 10.
The funnel plot of the rate of improvement in quality of life. RR = relative risk, SE = standard error.
Figure 11.
Figure 11.
The funnel plot of the incidence of gastrointestinal reactions. RR = relative risk, SE = standard error.
Figure 12.
Figure 12.
The funnel plot of the incidence of leukopenia. RR = relative risk, SE = standard error.
Figure 13.
Figure 13.
The funnel plot of the incidence of thrombocytopenia. RR = relative risk, SE = standard error.
Figure 14.
Figure 14.
The funnel plot of the incidence of hypodynamia. RR = relative risk, SE = standard error.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, et al. . Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64:9–29. - PubMed
    1. Shi SB, Ma TH, Li CH, et al. . Effect of maintenance therapy with dendritic cells: cytokine-induced killer cells in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Tumori. 2012;98:314–9. - PubMed
    1. Duan CX, Liang XG, Zhang ZQ. Efficacy analysis of endorphin combined with cisplatin in the treatment of malignant pleural effusion in non-small cell lung cancer. J Baotou Med College. 2015;31:45–6. (恩度联合顺铂治疗非小细胞肺癌恶性胸腔积液的疗效分析).
    1. Zheng QH, Hu W, Liao XF, et al. . A comparision between intrapleural injection of cisplatin combined with endostar and cisplatin alone in the treatment for malignant pleural effusion. J Chin Oncol. 2013;19:386–9. (顺铂序贯恩度与单纯顺铂胸腔内灌注治疗恶性胸腔积液的临床对照研究).
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S. (eds). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available at: www.cochrane-handbook.org.

Publication types

MeSH terms