Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May;57(3):467-471.
doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00484-z. Epub 2023 Jan 3.

Sensitivity Analysis for Restricted Mean Survival Time When Survival Curves Have Divergent Tails

Affiliations

Sensitivity Analysis for Restricted Mean Survival Time When Survival Curves Have Divergent Tails

Kentaro Ueno et al. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023 May.

Abstract

New immunotherapy methods are being developed to provide cancer patients with survival benefit. The tail effect of immuno-oncology (IO) therapy resulting in diverse tails of survival curves between treatment arms may provide important information for physicians to guide treatment decisions in clinical practice. The hazard ratio (HR) and the log-rank test may not be suitable for quantifying and interpreting the between-group difference in IO clinical trials because the underlying assumption that the HR is constant over time is not valid. As an alternative summary measure, the restricted mean survival time (RMST) has been attracting more attention for comparing survival curves. The RMST is defined as the mean survival time to a specific threshold timepoint τ and is calculated as the area under the curve within a specific time window from 0 to τ. Although physicians may wish to compare the RMST up to the end timepoint of a longer curve to elucidate the tail effect of the IO treatment, with the currently available statistical methods, τ is required to be set at the end timepoint of a shorter curve or before. To address this issue, we propose a sensitivity analysis approach to evaluating the between-group difference in the RMST at any timepoint that clinical investigators consider clinically relevant, thus being free from such a statistical constraint. Notably, this analysis can only provide complementary results; thus, it cannot function as the primary analysis.

Keywords: Immunotherapy; Randomized clinical trial; Restricted mean survival time; Sensitivity analysis; Tail effect; Time-to-event outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Shields MD, Marin-Acevedo JA, Pellini B. Immunotherapy for advanced non–small cell lung cancer: a decade of progress. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2021;41:e105–27. - DOI
    1. George S, Rini BI, Hammers HJ. Emerging role of combination immunotherapy in the first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma: a review. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5:411–21. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chang E, Pelosof L, Lemery S, Gong Y, Goldberg KB, Farrell AT, et al. Systematic review of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in oncology: from personalized medicine to public health. Oncologist. 2021;26:e1786–99. - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Adams S, Diéras V, Barrios CH, Winer EP, Schneeweiss A, Iwata H, et al. Patient-reported outcomes from the phase III IMpassion130 trial of atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(5):582–9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. D’Angelo SP, Larkin J, Sosman JA, Lebbé C, Brady B, Neyns B, et al. Efficacy and safety of nivolumab alone or in combination with ipilimumab in patients with mucosal melanoma: a pooled analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:226–35. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources