Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Jan 3;23(1):3.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03992-6.

Researching the application of virtual reality in medical education: one-year follow-up of a randomized trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Researching the application of virtual reality in medical education: one-year follow-up of a randomized trial

Wenyi Gan et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: Compared with traditional tendon repair teaching methods, using a virtual reality (VR) simulator to teach tendon suturing can significantly improve medical students' exercise time, operation flow and operation knowledge. At present, the purpose of this study is to explore the long-term influence of VR simulator teaching on the practice performance of medical students.

Method: This is a one-year long-term follow-up study of a randomized controlled study. A total of 117 participants who completed the initial study were invited to participate in the follow-up study. Participants in the VR group and the control group were required to complete a questionnaire developed by the authors and the teachers in the teaching and research department and to provide their surgical internship scores and Objective Structure Clinical Examination(OSCE) graduation scores.

Results: Of the 117 invitees, 108 completed the follow-up. The answers to the questions about career choice and study habits were more positive in the VR group than in the control group (p < 0.05). The total score for clinical practice in the VR group was better than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). In the OSCE examination, the scores for physical examination, suturing and knotting and image reading were higher in the VR group than in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The results of the one-year long-term follow-up indicated that compared with medical students experiencing the traditional teaching mode, those experiencing the VR teaching mode had more determined career pursuit and active willingness to learn, better evaluations from teachers in the process of surgical clinical practice, and better scores in physical examination, suturing and knotting and image reading in the OSCE examination. In the study of nonlinear dynamics to cultivate a good learning model for medical students, the VR teaching model is expected to become an effective and stable initial sensitive element.

Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry(25/05/2021, ChiCTR2100046648); http://www.chictr.org.cn/hvshowproject.aspx?id=90180 .

Keywords: Internship and residency; Medical Education; Nonlinear Dynamics; Virtual reality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT 2010 flow diagram showing the study process. VR: virtual reality
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
A-C: Students in the experimental group used VR simulator for tendon suture operation practice and examination; (D) Students in the control group used PowerPoint presentation to learn tendon suture operation
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A-B: Surgical internship results; (C-D): Objective structure clinical examination scores. FPP: Four puncture procedures; MCA: Medical case analysis; CDE: Cardiopulmonary dummy examination; WSCG: Wearing surgical clothes and gloves; SPD: Skin preparation and draping; SK: Suturing and knotting; SHC: Surgical history collection; GHC: Gynecological history collection; PGDE: Pediatric growth and development evaluation; PHC: Pediatric history collection; ns: not significant

References

    1. Sattar MU, Palaniappan S, Lokman A, Hassan A, Shah N, Riaz Z. Effects of virtual reality training on medical students’ learning motivation and competency. Pak J Med Sci. 2019;35(3):852–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kyaw BM, Saxena N, Posadzki P, Vseteckova J, Nikolaou CK, George PP, Divakar U, Masiello I, Kononowicz AA, Zary N, et al. Virtual reality for health professions education: systematic review and meta-analysis by the digital health education collaboration. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(1):e12959. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lohre R, Bois AJ, Pollock JW, Lapner P, McIlquham K, Athwal GS, Goel DP. Effectiveness of immersive virtual reality on orthopedic surgical skills and knowledge acquisition among senior surgical residents: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(12):e2031217. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Strandbygaard J, Bjerrum F, Maagaard M, Winkel P, Larsen CR, Ringsted C, Gluud C, Grantcharov T, Ottesen B, Sorensen JL. Instructor feedback versus no instructor feedback on performance in a laparoscopic virtual reality simulator: a randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2013;257(5):839–44. - PubMed
    1. Ende J. Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA. 1983;250(6):777–81. - PubMed

Publication types