Classification(s) of Cervical Deformity
- PMID: 36597621
- PMCID: PMC9816582
- DOI: 10.14245/ns.2245864.392
Classification(s) of Cervical Deformity
Abstract
Cervical spine deformities (CSD) are complex surgical issues with currently heterogenous management strategies. The classification of CSD is still an evolving field. Rudimentary classification schemas were initially proposed in the late 20th century but were largely informal and based on the underlying etiology (i.e. , postsurgical, traumatic, or inflammatory). The first formal classification schema was proposed by Ames et al. in 2015 who established a standard nomenclature for describing these deformities. This classification system established 5 deformity descriptors based on curve apex location (cervical, cervicothoracic, thoracic, craniovertebral junctional, and coronal deformities) and 5 deformity modifiers which helped surgeons utilize a standard language when discussing CSD patients. Koller et al. in 2019 subsequently established a classification system for patients with rigid cervical kyphosis based on regional and global sagittal alignment. Most recently, Kim et al. in 2020 proposed an updated classification system utilizing dynamic cervical spine imaging to guide surgical treatment of CSD patients. It identified 4 major groups of deformities - (1) those with "flat-neck" deformities caused by cervical lordosis T1 slope mismatch; (2) those with focal kyphotic deformities between 2 cervical vertebrae; (3) those with cervicothoracic deformities caused by large T1 slope; and (4) those with coronal deformities. Group 2 deformities most often required combined anterior-posterior approaches with short constructs, and group 3 deformities most often required posterior-only approaches with 3-column osteotomies.
Keywords: Cervical kyphosis; Cervical spine deformity; Spinal deformity.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have nothing to disclose.
Figures



Comment in
-
Commentary on "Classification(s) of Cervical Deformity".Neurospine. 2023 Mar;20(1):405-407. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346042.021. Epub 2023 Mar 31. Neurospine. 2023. PMID: 37016889 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Reply to Commentary on "Classification(s) of Cervical Deformity".Neurospine. 2023 Mar;20(1):408-409. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346112.056. Epub 2023 Mar 31. Neurospine. 2023. PMID: 37016890 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Lenke LG, Betz RR, Haher TR, et al. Multisurgeon assessment of surgical decision-making in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: curve classification, operative approach, and fusion levels. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26:2347–53. - PubMed
-
- Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:1169–81. - PubMed
-
- Schwab F, Ungar B, Blondel B, et al. Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: a validation study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37:1077–82. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous