Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec;19(4):862-867.
doi: 10.14245/ns.2245864.392. Epub 2022 Dec 31.

Classification(s) of Cervical Deformity

Affiliations

Classification(s) of Cervical Deformity

Austin C Kaidi et al. Neurospine. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Cervical spine deformities (CSD) are complex surgical issues with currently heterogenous management strategies. The classification of CSD is still an evolving field. Rudimentary classification schemas were initially proposed in the late 20th century but were largely informal and based on the underlying etiology (i.e. , postsurgical, traumatic, or inflammatory). The first formal classification schema was proposed by Ames et al. in 2015 who established a standard nomenclature for describing these deformities. This classification system established 5 deformity descriptors based on curve apex location (cervical, cervicothoracic, thoracic, craniovertebral junctional, and coronal deformities) and 5 deformity modifiers which helped surgeons utilize a standard language when discussing CSD patients. Koller et al. in 2019 subsequently established a classification system for patients with rigid cervical kyphosis based on regional and global sagittal alignment. Most recently, Kim et al. in 2020 proposed an updated classification system utilizing dynamic cervical spine imaging to guide surgical treatment of CSD patients. It identified 4 major groups of deformities - (1) those with "flat-neck" deformities caused by cervical lordosis T1 slope mismatch; (2) those with focal kyphotic deformities between 2 cervical vertebrae; (3) those with cervicothoracic deformities caused by large T1 slope; and (4) those with coronal deformities. Group 2 deformities most often required combined anterior-posterior approaches with short constructs, and group 3 deformities most often required posterior-only approaches with 3-column osteotomies.

Keywords: Cervical kyphosis; Cervical spine deformity; Spinal deformity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Ames Classification for cervical spine deformity – deformities broken down into 5 deformity descriptors with 5 subsequent modifiers to account for sagittal vertical axis, horizontal gaze, cervical lordosis (CL), myelopathy, and overall SRS-Schwab classification (T, thoracic; L, thoracolumbar/lumbar; D, double curve; N, no coronal curve) [8]. CBVA, chin-brow vertical angle; TS, T1 slope; mJOA, modified Japanese Orthopedic Association; PI, pelvic incidence; LL, lumbar lordosis.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Figure demonstrating classifications of cervical sagittal balance types A-D (from left to right respectively) by Koller et al. and the European Cervical Spine Research Society [9]. SVA, sagittal vertical axis.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Three groups of sagittal deformities identified by Kim et al. [10] Dynamic images are utilized to identify the etiology of the deformity as well as plan surgical correction. “Ext” indicates extended neck lateral radiographs. Lat, lateral; Ext, extension; AP, anteroposterior.

Comment in

References

    1. Passias PG, Alas H, Bess S, et al. Patient-related and radiographic predictors of inferior health-related quality-of-life measures in adult patients with nonoperative spinal deformity. J Neurosurg Spine. 2021 Apr 2;:1–7. doi: 10.3171/2020.9.SPINE20519. . [Epub] - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Kim HJ, et al. Comparison of best versus worst clinical outcomes for adult cervical deformity surgery. Global Spine J. 2019;9:303–14. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Haher TR, et al. Multisurgeon assessment of surgical decision-making in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: curve classification, operative approach, and fusion levels. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26:2347–53. - PubMed
    1. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:1169–81. - PubMed
    1. Schwab F, Ungar B, Blondel B, et al. Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: a validation study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37:1077–82. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources